njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … driving, N.J.S.A. 39:4-96. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I: DEFENDANT WAS DENIED DUE PROCESS AND A FAIR TRIAL … AMENDS. V AND XIV; N.J. CONST., ART. I, PARS. 1, 9, & 10. POINT II: PROSECUTORIAL ERROR IN SUMMATION FURTHER …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … appeal followed. On appeal, defendant raises the following point headings for our consideration: POINT I: THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FINDING THAT DEFENDANT'S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the following arguments for this court's consideration: POINT I THE [PCR JUDGE] ERRED IN DENYING THE DEFENDANT'S … to His Case and Thereby Render Him Ineligible for [ISP]. POINT II THE MATTER SHOULD BE REMANDED FOR AN AMENDED …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … was three months and ten days late. The judge further pointed out that defendant failed to provide an affidavit or … petition . . . . Before us, defendant argues: 7 A-4150-18 POINT I TRIAL DEFENSE COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE BY FAILING TO …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … and criminal history. Defendant raises the following points on appeal: POINT I. APPELLANT IS NOT BARRED FROM RELIEF UNDER RULE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … 2019. This appeal followed. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED, AND ABUSED ITS DISCRETION … DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR DISMISSAL 5 A-5265-18 POINT II THE TRIAL COURT ERRED, AND ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … not reiterate them again here, except for the following points that are relevant to the issues presented in the … he unsuccessfully pursued in the Law Division. He argues: POINT I THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT'S SECOND …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … to support his allegations and his arguments on these three points were belied by the record. Specifically, the judge … to Judge Ironson and Judge Amirata. Defendant contends: POINT I BECAUSE [DEFENDANT] RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … presents the following issues for our consideration . POINT ONE THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING [DEFENDANT'S] … FOR TRIAL AND PRESSURED [DEFENDANT] TO PLEAD GUILTY. POINT TWO THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING [DEFENDANT'S] …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … October 31, 2019. He raises the following issues on appeal. POINT I ALL OF DEFENDANT'S STATEMENTS AT THE SCENE OF HIS … OF CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION WITHOUT A VALID MIRANDA1 WAIVER. POINT II THE COURT IMPROPERLY PUNISHED DEFENDANT FOR HIS …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … on two children. Defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I THE PCR COURT ERRED IN RULING THAT J.C. RECEIVED … TRIAL COUNSEL. A. The Strickland-Cronic-Fritz Standard. POINT II TRIAL COUNSEL'S CUMULATIVE ERRORS MANDATE THAT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … appeal followed. On appeal, the State raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I APPLYING N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2(G) TO REGISTRANTS WHO, LIKE …
njcourts.gov
… October 18, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli and O'Connor. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law … On appeal, defendant raises the following contentions: POINT I - THIS MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR AN EVIDENTIARY … COURT TO ADDRESS THESE CLAIMS. (Partially Raised Below). POINT II - THIS MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR A NEW PCR …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … vehicle and recovered some large-capacity magazines, hollow-point ammunition, and a revolver from inside a black bag … PCR. On appeal, defendant raises the following contentions: POINT I THE COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT'S PETITION FOR …
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 27, 2018 – Decided Before Judges O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from Superior Court of New … raises the following contentions for our consideration: POINT I: THERE REMAINS A FACTUAL QUESTION OF WHETHER CFM HAD ACCESS TO THE AREA WHERE PLAINTIFF FELL. POINT II: BY BREACHING ITS CONTRACT TO PERFORM REGULAR …
njcourts.gov
… Saldutti Law Group, attorneys for respondent (Thomas B. O'Connell, of counsel and on the brief). PER CURIAM A party … the Bank commenced the foreclosure action, the court appointed a receiver, the receiver entered into a lease with … and quantum meruit. In contrast, the brief's sole point heading stated: "PURSUANT TO R. 4:9-1, THIS COURT …
njcourts.gov
… with the State, defendant Azmar Carter pled guilty to second degree unlawful NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE … . . [from his person and] threw it to the ground."2 At this point, Johnson testified that they picked up the bag of … case. Defendant now appeals raising the following argument. POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FINDING THAT POLICE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … did not apply, and plaintiff conceded his age at that point would not provide a basis for changed circumstances … did not represent any changed circumstances. She further pointed to the several concessions plaintiff made to the …
njcourts.gov
… brief). PER CURIAM Defendant Elex Hyman appeals from his conviction by guilty plea following the Law Division's … raises the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I DEFENDANT WAS ENTITLED TO A TESTIMONIAL HEARING ON … DENIED HIM HIS RIGHTS TO DUE PROCESS AND A FAIR TRIAL. POINT II THE WARRANTLESS ENTRY OF [CO- DEFENDANT] GANTT['S] …
njcourts.gov
… brief). PER CURIAM Defendant Ronald Horton appeals from his conviction by the Law Division for driving while intoxicated … 39:4-50.4a. His appellate brief presents the following points for our consideration: I. MOTION TO SUPPRESS THE … find no merit in any of the arguments raised in those three points. Except as addressed below, they do not warrant …