-
njcourts.gov
… OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0433-23 KYLE FORCINITO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOROUGH OF CLAYTON, … Gloucester County, Docket No. L-0512-23. Hegge & Confusione, LLC, attorneys for appellant (Michael Confusione, of … eight years with no prior disciplinary charges and received commendations for his service. However, after testing …
-
njcourts.gov
… Agued May 29, 2024 – Decided August 27, 2024 Before Judges Sumners and Rose. On appeal from the Superior … plaintiff appeals the summary judgment dismissal of her complaint. The court ruled that as a matter of law, … no evidence of salt or sand where she parked to prevent someone from slipping and falling. Plowed snow was pushed up …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 15, 2024 – Decided August 29, 2024 Before Judges Gilson and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from the … 5, 2023 order denying their motion to amend an unverified complaint. We conclude an unverified complaint found to be a … constituted an abuse of discretion. Relying on Kernan v. One Wash. Park Urban Renewal Assocs., 154 N.J. 437, 456 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted June 18, 2024 – Decided June 27, 2024 Before Judges Currier and Mawla. On appeal from the Board of … the following notice: IMPORTANT: This decision will become final, unless, within twenty . . . days of the date of … 31, 2023, to expand the time for appeal to "within [twenty-one] days after the notification was mailed to the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 9, 2024 – Decided December 19, 2024 Before Judges Sabatino and Jacobs. On appeal from the Superior … had observed defendant's car traveling 64 mph in a 45-mph zone. Defendant was driving the car, which had three other … the parties. We intimate no views on the appropriate outcome of the remand. The remand shall be completed within …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 30, 2024 – Decided December 19, 2024 Before Judges Marczyk and Torregrossa-O'Connor. On appeal from … on appeal. On March 4, 2024, plaintiff filed a verified complaint for ejectment and an order to show cause, claiming … 2:5-4(a). 4 A-2352-23 The "appellate function is a limited one: we do not disturb the factual findings and legal …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 12, 2023 – Decided December 18, 2023 Before Judges Haas and Puglisi. On appeal from the Superior … limited. R. 1:36-3. 2 A-3376-21 dismissing the defamation complaint plaintiff filed against defendants David Wildstein … plaintiff's motion for reconsideration was approximately one year out of time under Rule 4:49-2. Accordingly, the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued May 15, 2024 – Decided June 7, 2024 Before Judges Vernoia and Walcott-Henderson. On appeal from an … and Dominique Kilmartin, on the briefs). Francine R. Foner argued the cause for respondent (Hyderally & … on plaintiff Raymond Manzo's claims defendants failed to accommodate his disability, terminated his employment with …
-
njcourts.gov
… NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2002-23 S.K.,1 Complainant-Appellant, v. NEWPORT GARDENS CONDOMINIUM … Argued February 25, 2025 – Decided May 1, 2025 Before Judges Sumners and Perez Friscia. On appeal from the … from Newport Garden's policy allowing renters to have just one pet. The order also directed Newport Gardens to "take …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 28, 2023 – Decided March 24, 2023 Before Judges Gilson and Gummer. On appeal from the Superior … we affirm. In 2016, a jury found defendant guilty of committing second-degree certain persons not to have a … We affirmed the denial of the PCR in all respects except one. Because the judge had not commented on defendant's …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 12, 2022 – Decided December 27, 2022 Before Judges DeAlmeida and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. 2 A-3004-20 Petitioner Hugo Aguilar appeals the Law Division's March 16, 2021 … J. Taylor's written opinion. We add the following brief comments. On April 26, 2016, petitioner was charged with …
-
njcourts.gov
… Form C(1). Uniform Interrogatories to be Answered by … to the vehicle involved in the incident referred to in the complaint: Underline Answer (a)Do you admit ownership? Yes … do not admit control: (a) state the name and address of the one in control; and (b) if control was in another by …
-
njcourts.gov
… Kelly S. Crawford - NJ Attorney ID #029141993 RIKER DANZIG SCHERER HYLAND … Plaza FILED JAN 13 2022 RACHELLE L. HARZ J,S.C. One Speedwell Avenue Morristown, New Jersey 07962-1981 (973) … Case No. 292 ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE THIS MOTION having been brought …
-
njcourts.gov
/::" l,l ~ ti~c . ,,, "'~ b SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW J~SE\O …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 11, 2023 – Decided October 20, 2023 Before Judges Sumners and Rose. On appeal from the Superior … W.P., Jr., appellant pro se. Ronan, Tuzzio & Giannone, attorneys for respondent (John M. Hockin, Jr., of … se from the summary judgment dismissal of his Law Division complaint against defendant C.C., a psychiatrist who …
-
njcourts.gov
… NO. A-1390-22 WELLS FARGO NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF BEAR STEARNS ASSET BACKED … borrowed $550,000 from plaintiff's predecessor, United Community Mortgage Corp., in 2007, secured by a mortgage on … and the like, making confirmation inequitable and unjust to one or more of the parties.'" Crane v. Bielski, 15 N.J. 342, …
-
njcourts.gov
… JANUARY 16, 2024 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER THIS MATTER, having come before the Court at a case management conference on January … prior Order, counsel will alert the Court prior to filing one of the aforementioned motions by sending an email to the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Defendant-Appellant, and JERSEY CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY and FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION, Defendants. … Argued January 24, 2024 – Decided February 8, 2024 Before Judges Susswein and Vanek. On appeal from an … Joseph Morgan argued cause for the respondents (Kirsch, Stone & Morgan, PA, attorneys; Gregg A. Stone, on the brief). …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 10, 2023 — Decided October 24, 2023 Before Judges Sabatino and Chase. On appeal from the Superior … Code, N.J.A.C. 5:70-1.1 to -4.20, claiming the judge erroneously concluded the State's witness at trial did not commit perjury. Having reviewed the record, in light of the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Respondent. Submitted May 13, 2024 – Decided May 20, 2024 Before Judges Sabatino and Chase. On appeal from the New … that upheld a hearing officer's determination that she committed prohibited act *.803/*.002 (aiding another person … a hearing. At appellant's request, the hearing was postponed several days to enable her to obtain the report of …