-
njcourts.gov
… and BERNICE HICKS individually, and MEMBERS OF THE PASTORIOUS BOARD OF DIRECTORS, Defendants. … Submitted November 28, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Reisner and Hoffman. On appeal from Superior … with this opinion.1 On April 14, 2015, plaintiff filed a complaint asserting that defendant and its board of …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 28, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Nugent and Currier. On appeal from Superior … Law Offices, attorneys for appellant (Robert H. Heck, on the brief). Respondent has not filed a brief. PER CURIAM … her home. The following day she went to the emergency room complaining of pain in her neck, left shoulder, and lower …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 7, 2018 — Decided Before Judges Nugent and Geiger. On appeal from the New Jersey State Parole Board. Ian Burton, appellant pro … days of gap time credit. In 2013, defendant appealed the computation of his sentence. The appeal came before us on …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 16, 2020 – Decided August 6, 2021 Before Judges Fuentes and Firko. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Atlantic … assistance of counsel: The petitioner asserts these shortcomings prejudiced his case; however, he has failed to …
-
njcourts.gov
… (AS) Civil Act ion CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER I This matter coming in for a Case Management Conference before Special Master Agatha N. Dzikiewicz and the following parties on July 23, 2014: FIRM ATTORNEY CLIENT …
-
njcourts.gov
… Defendant-Appellant. Submitted October 8, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti and Currier. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union … the particular chipped areas would be $500. Following the completion of testimony, the judge found that, although …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 3, 2019 – Decided October 24, 2019 Before Judges Koblitz and Whipple. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Atlantic … not establish extraordinary circumstances sufficient to overcome the ninety-day time bar of N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. This appeal …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 31, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fuentes and Moynihan. On appeal from Superior … (Henry F. Reichner, of counsel; Kristy L. Keiser, on the brief). PER CURIAM Defendant David Bennett appeals from … January 9, 2019 2 A-0136-17T3 foreclosure action that was commenced following defendant's failure to make payments on …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 24, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Messano and Fasciale. On appeal from Superior … for appellant (Lee March Grayson, Designated Counsel, on the brief). Scott A. Coffina, Burlington County Prosecutor, … a change of sentence pursuant to Rule 3:21-10(b)(1) after completing the period of parole ineligibility.1 Judge Haines …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 31, 2017 — Decided Before Judges Koblitz and Rothstadt. On appeal from Superior … L.L.C., attorneys for appellant (Jessica Ragno Spraque, on the briefs). John C. Feggeler, Jr., attorney for respondent. … Judy's sole allegation of harassment, involving threatening comments. Randy was provided five hours a week parenting …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 14, 2019 — Decided Before Judges Whipple and Mawla. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex … plea and sentence "long since disappeared," and the outcome would not change. Defendant raises the following points …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 30, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Fuentes and Gooden Brown. On appeal from … Municipal Appeal No. 25-15-C. Scott A. Gorman argued the cause for appellant. Alexander Mech, Special Deputy … him to pay a fine of $506 and perform thirty days of community service, directed him to install an interlock …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 12, 2018 – Decided June 11, 2018 Before Judges Accurso and Vernoia. On appeal from Superior … Docket No. F-001407-16. Richard O. Venino, Jr., argued the cause for appellant. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE … Clearview admits it received, Pro Cap filed a verified complaint in rem to foreclose its tax lien in January 2016. …
-
njcourts.gov
… filed electronically through eCourts Appellate. Contact Information For procedural assistance contact the Appellate Pretrial Detention unit at 609-815-2950 x … Appellate filing application. On the eCourts Appellate Welcome page, click File New Case. Revised 9/2022 Page 2 of 8 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 21, 2022 – Decided September 28, 2022 Before Judges Haas and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Hudson … for the reasons set forth in the trial judge's comprehensive written decision denying defendant's …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 18, 2024 – Decided October 2, 2024 Before Judges Rose and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Sussex … trial de novo in the Law Division. Defendant's notice was accompanied by a two-page "Reasons for Appeal." In the ensuing …
-
njcourts.gov
… Tuesday, December 03, 2024 Submission of an Application for Reinstatement or Payment of Non- Compliance Fees Topic: Submission of an application for … or Payment of Non- Compliance Fees Login Instructions Use the attorney registration portal to login. Select Attorney …
-
njcourts.gov
… OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0433-23 KYLE FORCINITO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOROUGH OF CLAYTON, … 25, 2024 Before Judges Sumners and Rose. Op appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Gloucester … eight years with no prior disciplinary charges and received commendations for his service. However, after testing …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 28, 2024 – Decided September 6, 2024 Before Judges Berdote Byrne and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Ocean … with Newark. In March 2023, plaintiff filed an eviction complaint, seeking payment for reimbursement of the …
-
njcourts.gov
… 7, 2024 Resubmitted June 3, 2024 – Decided June 17, 2024 Before Judges Sumners,2 Rose and Messano. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family … the TPO was pending." Ibid. We agreed "that defendant's compliance with the temporary restraints does not …