-
njcourts.gov
… New Jersey 07101-0652 (973) 622-4444 Attorneys for Defendants Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Astrazeneca … AB; ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S ASTRAZENECA,PLC;and COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR ASTRAZENECA, UK LIMITED; … A SHORT FORM DOE(S) 1 through 20; and JANE DOE(S) PLAINTIFF FACT SHEET PURSUANT TO 1 through 20, CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER …
-
njcourts.gov
… 07962-1917 (973) 267-0058 jUdge Jamie D. Happas . Attorneysfor Defendants AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Astra'Zeneca … (collectively "AstraZeneca") to dismiss plaintiff's Amended Complaint with prejudice for failure to serve a Short Form Plaintiff Fact Sheet pursuant to Case Management Order No.4 ("CMO 4"). …
-
njcourts.gov
… 652 Newark, New Jersey 07101-0652 (973) 622-4444 Attorneys for Defendants AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and … 1 through 20, ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S Defendants. COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO SERVE A COMPLETED LONG FORM PLAINTIFF FACT SHEET PURSUANT TO CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NOS. 4, 4A, 22, …
-
njcourts.gov
… 652 Newark, New Jersey 07101-0652 (973) 622-4444 Attorneys for Defendants Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Astrazeneca … AB; ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S ASTRAZENECA,PLC;and COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR ASTRAZENECA, UK LIMITED; … A SHORT FORM DOE(S) 1 through 20; and JANE DOE(S) PLAINTIFF FACT SHEET PURSUANT TO 1 through 20, CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER …
njcourts.gov
… Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, and BTL INDUSTRIES INC., Respondents. … We discern the following procedural history and pertinent facts from the record. Petitioner worked as a marketing … in order to qualify for benefits under the Unemployment Compensation Law. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4; N.J.S.A. 43:21-19; …
njcourts.gov
… NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY … Stephen M. Orlofsky, (Blank Rome, LLP, attorneys) for defendants AutoDrop, Inc., Hayes Miller and Bryce … This is not a request to maintain the status quo, but is in fact a dispositive request for complete relief under the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 21, 2022 – Decided September 28, 2022 Before Judges Haas and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the Superior … for the reasons set forth in the trial judge's comprehensive written decision denying defendant's … based upon specific and articulable facts that, taken together with 5 A-2294-20 rational inferences from those …
njcourts.gov
… OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0433-23 KYLE FORCINITO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOROUGH OF CLAYTON, … eight years with no prior disciplinary charges and received commendations for his service. However, after testing … and the judge failed to conduct independent findings of fact. He 4 A-0433-23 claims the judge erroneously relied on …
njcourts.gov
… Agued May 29, 2024 – Decided August 27, 2024 Before Judges Sumners and Rose. On appeal from the Superior … plaintiff appeals the summary judgment dismissal of her complaint. The court ruled that as a matter of law, … answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 25, 2024 – Decided October 18, 2024 Before Judges Marczyk and Paganelli. On appeal from the New … coverage for three years under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA). However, after the COBRA … 2 Under N.J.A.C. 1:1-3.1(a), "[a] contested case shall be commenced in the State agency with appropriate subject …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 13, 2024 – Decided November 25, 2024 Before Judges Chase and Vanek. On appeal from the Superior … to plaintiff, with the parties' proportional net income indicated at 76% and 24%, respectively. Defendant filed … Cesare, 154 N.J. 394, 412 (1998)). "We do 'not disturb the factual findings and legal conclusions of the trial judge …
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 18, 2024 – Decided October 31, 2024 Before Judges Rose and Puglisi. On appeal from the Superior … David E. Konigsberg, M.D. and dismissing plaintiff's complaint. We affirm. In November 2010, plaintiff leased … On appeal, plaintiff argues there were issues of material fact that should have precluded summary judgment and …
default
… Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, and AAH MANAGEMENT CO., INC., … administrative assistant at the Barrington Mews apartment complex. His regular hours were 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., five … cause to quit "the unsteadiness of the job and the fact that [the welder] was working, on an average, only one …
default
… Submitted November 5, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Messano and Fasciale. On appeal from Superior … owe substantial deference to the Family Part's findings of fact because of that court's special expertise in family … to the judge's legal conclusions, Manalapan Realty v. Twp. Comm. of Manalapan, 140 N.J. 366, 378 (1995), we "should not …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 28, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Reisner and Hoffman. On appeal from Superior … with this opinion.1 On April 14, 2015, plaintiff filed a complaint asserting that defendant and its board of … alleged, without asserting any additional relevant facts, that defendants violated the Consumer Fraud Act by …
njcourts.gov
… Third-Party Defendants, and TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant- Appellant. … referred to in the record as Pedro Moran- Alvarado. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … We concluded there "were genuine issues of material fact" that precluded granting summary judgment to EZ Donuts: …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 21, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Nugent. On appeal from Superior … Because a landlord is not liable for injuries suffered by a commercial tenant's employee due to lack of maintenance of … cross-motion. The motion record contains these undisputed facts. When plaintiff fell, he worked for a company that …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 1, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Moynihan. On appeal from Superior … FAILING TO HOLD A PLENARY HEARING, OR TO RENDER FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AS TO THE STATUTORY CUSTODY … opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). We add only the following few comments. 4 A-1300-17T2 We reject the argument in Point I …
default
… Submitted May 1, 2019 – Decided May 15, 2019 Before Judges Currier and Mayer. On appeal from the Board of … Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Jeffrey D. Padgett, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief). NOT FOR … with the Township of Brick (Township) for conduct unbecoming a public employee and other reasons. We affirm. After …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 30, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Lihotz and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … possession within 500 feet of a public housing complex, N.J.S.A. 2C:2C:35-7.1. Defendant was sentenced to … His conviction was affirmed on appeal. The underlying facts supporting his convictions are outlined in our per …