njcourts.gov
… Argued March 2, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … referral was unfounded, but a protection plan was put in place requiring defendant's care of Caleb be supervised by … satisfied prongs one, three, and four of the four-prong "best interests of the child" test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a), …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 2, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … referral was unfounded, but a protection plan was put in place requiring defendant's care of Caleb be supervised by … satisfied prongs one, three, and four of the four-prong "best interests of the child" test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a), …
njcourts.gov
… the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither … faith, it should resolve the relocation motion using the best interests standard instead of the more lenient “not . . … relocation determinations pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-2. In place of the Baures standard, courts should conduct a best …
-
njcourts.gov
… the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither … faith, it should resolve the relocation motion using the best interests standard instead of the more lenient “not . . … relocation determinations pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-2. In place of the Baures standard, courts should conduct a best …
njcourts.gov
… PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … contends that the trial judge erred in concluding that she placed the children at risk of serious harm by permitting … that (1) the Division had proven all four prongs of the best interests test by clear and convincing evidence, …
-
njcourts.gov
… PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … contends that the trial judge erred in concluding that she placed the children at risk of serious harm by permitting … that (1) the Division had proven all four prongs of the best interests test by clear and convincing evidence, …
default
… Submitted May 1, 2019 – Decided May 16, 2019 Before Judges Nugent, Reisner and Mawla. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … Disorder, and prescription drug abuse. The Division placed Jake with Sean, but he proved to be an unreliable … concluded the Division had proven the four prongs of the best interests test under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). He …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 1, 2019 – Decided May 16, 2019 Before Judges Nugent, Reisner and Mawla. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … Disorder, and prescription drug abuse. The Division placed Jake with Sean, but he proved to be an unreliable … concluded the Division had proven the four prongs of the best interests test under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). He …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … terminal step of fact-finding. A fact-finding hearing took place on May 14, 2021 pursuant to N.J.A.C. 19:12-4.3. The … the definition of SOE. The Authority presented its "last, best and final" proposal which limited SOE pay to …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … terminal step of fact-finding. A fact-finding hearing took place on May 14, 2021 pursuant to N.J.A.C. 19:12-4.3. The … the definition of SOE. The Authority presented its "last, best and final" proposal which limited SOE pay to …
default
… RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … in his analysis of the first two prongs of the four-prong best-interests-of-the-child test, the trial judge did not … implemented by the trial court . . . ." 6 The children were placed in different resource homes. According to our review …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … in his analysis of the first two prongs of the four-prong best-interests-of-the-child test, the trial judge did not … implemented by the trial court . . . ." 6 The children were placed in different resource homes. According to our review …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 that the sanction imposed is in the best interests of the children. We further hold the factors … is already a judgment or an agreement affecting custody in place, it is presumed A-1168-18T4 11 it "embodies a best …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 21, 2022 – Decided November 3, 2022 Before Judges DeAlmeida and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … VIOLATED APPELLANT'S DUE PROCESS BY ORDERING APPELLANT TO PLACE HER CASE IN CHIEF FIRST DESPITE RESPONDENT HAVING BEEN … to demonstrate the status quo is no longer in a child's best interest. See Bisbing v. Bisbing, 230 N.J. 309, 322 …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 21, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Koblitz, Rothstadt and Sumners. On appeal from … S.G.R. (Sarah). Ray contends that the Division of Child Placement and Permanency (the Division) failed to prove all four prongs of the best- interests-of-the-child standard, N.J.S.A. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 21, 2022 – Decided November 3, 2022 Before Judges DeAlmeida and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … VIOLATED APPELLANT'S DUE PROCESS BY ORDERING APPELLANT TO PLACE HER CASE IN CHIEF FIRST DESPITE RESPONDENT HAVING BEEN … to demonstrate the status quo is no longer in a child's best interest. See Bisbing v. Bisbing, 230 N.J. 309, 322 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 21, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Koblitz, Rothstadt and Sumners. On appeal from … S.G.R. (Sarah). Ray contends that the Division of Child Placement and Permanency (the Division) failed to prove all four prongs of the best- interests-of-the-child standard, N.J.S.A. …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 9, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Reisner, Rothstadt and Sumners. On appeal from … Title 9 abuse and neglect action,2 Max and Peter were placed in one non-relative resource home, while Valerie was … by clear and convincing evidence all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and that …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 9, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Reisner, Rothstadt and Sumners. On appeal from … Title 9 abuse and neglect action,2 Max and Peter were placed in one non-relative resource home, while Valerie was … by clear and convincing evidence all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and that …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 24, 2023 – Decided November 8, 2023 Before Judges Rose and Perez Friscia. On appeal from the … her factual findings and analyzing the fourteen enumerated best interests factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). The … was of school age. Our Supreme Court has made clear: In place of the Baures standard, courts should conduct a best …