-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … for a final extreme risk protective order (FERPO) that compelled D.J. to surrender his firearms. We affirm. NOT FOR … replied affirmatively both times. Because the court fully complied with the requirements of the Directive, D.J.'s …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … January 17, 2020, plaintiff Varinder Kaur filed a verified complaint in support of an order to show cause against … Whitman Street in Carteret (the subject property) . In the complaint, plaintiff alleged she "bought [the subject …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … the plea agreement, defendant understood the State would recommend ten years in prison subject to the No Early Release … 2C:44-1(a)(3) (stating "[t]he risk that the defendant will commit another offense") and N.J.S.A. 2C:44- 1(a)(9) …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Party Plaintiff-Respondent, and XIN CAO, Defendant, v. DIEGO LOMBARDO, Third-Party Defendant/ Appellant. … as a tenant. Although Cao is named as a defendant in the complaint, the judgment was entered in favor of Shang only. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … and well-reasoned opinion. We add only the following brief comments. We discern the following facts from the record. … affirming the denial of petitioner's application. In his accompanying written 4 A-3319-19 opinion, Judge Oxley …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … 23, 2018 hearing addressing the married parties' cross-complaints of harassment under the Prevention of Domestic … A-3329-17T1 arose that formed the basis of the their cross-complaints. After James was released from county jail,2 he …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … in Judge Richmond's decision. We add the following comments. In June 2016, the Division obtained custody of … to return to West Virginia after his New Jersey sentence is completed. After defendant returned to the New Jersey …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … signed a retainer agreement, stipulating plaintiff would be compensated on a contingency basis and paid twenty percent … contingency fee. Following the settlement, plaintiff communicated with defendant requesting $9000, representing …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). We add the following comments. We are bound to accept the trial court's fact … court's legal determinations, Manalapan Realty, LP v. Twp. Comm. of Manalapan, 140 N.J. 366, 378 (1995). Here, the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … has exhibited bad faith in these proceedings by refusing to comply with previous orders of this [c]ourt and has taken … the father violated numerous court orders requiring him to comply with discovery or the payment of the parties' …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … CURATIVE INSTRUCTION DUE TO PROSECUTOR'S PREJUDICIAL COMMENTS DURING CLOSING ARGUMENT. C. FIRST PCR COUNSEL WAS … Curative Instruction Due to Prosecutor's Prejudicial Comments during Closing Argument. C. First PCR Counsel was …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … County issued an FRO against defendant after finding he committed an act of domestic violence against A.L., with … written, personal, electronic, or other form of contact or communication" with A.L., as well as her sister, N.D.L., …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … OF LABOR, EQUINOX MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC., and STARR COMPANY, Respondents. ________________________________ … Respondents Equinox Management Group, Inc. and Starr Company have not filed briefs. PER CURIAM NOT FOR …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … and Disability Insurance, who denied appellant unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm. We discern the following … her resignation, appellant was paid $10.50 per hour, plus commissions. Factoring in her commissions, she earned on …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … purpose of debauching or impairing her morals. The State recommended a suspended three-year term of imprisonment … subject to parole supervision for life (PSL). Defendant completed his plea form and supplemental plea forms …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … motion, the trial judge specifically determined she had not committed fraud and, as such, she should not be barred from … bars the ability to sue if a New Jersey resident is not in compliance with the statutory provisions mandating insurance …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … costs. We affirm. I On December 3, 2018, plaintiff filed a complaint against Ramirez alleging breach of contract. The … are so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant and reasonable credible evidence as to …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … and confirmed defendant was satisfied with plea counsel's services. The judge also cited the sentencing transcript … plea and sentence "long since disappeared," and the outcome would not change. Defendant raises the following points …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0481-19T4 EPCO SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BRIGHTSTAR … another ground for termination. In October 2018, seller commenced this action in the Chancery Division, seeking …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … to the judge's legal conclusions, Manalapan Realty v. Twp. Comm. of Manalapan, 140 N.J. 366, 378 (1995), we "should not … or section 1 of P.L.2013, c.7 (C.9:2-12.1) concerning a service member's absence due to a deployment or …