njcourts.gov
… SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON WDICIAL CONDUCT DOCKET NO. ACJC 2017-059 … Admitted. 3. Denied as stated, except to admit that at some point in time late in the evening of November 11, 2016, or … proofs. 7. Admitted. 8. Admitted. 9. Admits that at some point after the field sobriety tests were performed and …
njcourts.gov
… Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief). 1 Consistent with our opinion on defendant's direct appeal, we … two arguments, which he articulates as follows: 5 A-2129-23 Point I – TRIAL COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO … PROVIDED A RATIONAL BASIS TO SUPPORT AN INSTRUCTION. Point II – THE PETITIONER RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the guilty plea on April 14.1 On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I DEFENSE COUNSEL'S CONDUCT DURING AN OFF-THE-RECORD … PCR counsel's filing of the motion. 4 A-3707-22 POINT II GIVEN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … and other anti-social behavior. Defendant appeals arguing: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION … Raise The Brady Violation Claim On The First PCR Petition. POINT II NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE REVEAL[S] THE STATE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … 287. This section of Route 287 has three lanes. At some point, either Villarejo's truck hit the rear left corner of … in the 3 A-3361-21 center lane on Route 287 South. At this point, the judge interrupted Villarejo's testimony and began …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … In June of 2018, these interactions reached a breaking point when Okogun was informed he had again defied the … was timely based on the continuing violation doctrine. He points to Wilson v. Wal-Mart Stores, 158 N.J. 263, 272 …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … evidentiary hearing. Defendant appeals, arguing in a single point that: THE PCR COURT ERRED IN SUMMARILY DENYING … communication with counsel prejudiced him. The judge also pointed out that counsel met with defendant "multiple" times …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … On appeal, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT ONE The Exhibits Offered by Defendant at Trial and … Were Summaries Properly Admissible under [N.J.R.E.] 1006. POINT TWO The Trial Court’s Factual Finding as to the Amount …
njcourts.gov
… January 10, 2019 – Decided July 26, 2019 Before Judges O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … On appeal, defendant argues the following: 6 A-0198-17T2 POINT I: THE DENIAL OF A POST-TRIAL GRAVES ACT WAIVER … AND IS ENTITLED TO A HEARING BEFORE THE ASSIGNMENT JUDGE. POINT II: ROBERT BILLARD WAS DENIED DUE PROCESS AND …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … a guilty plea. Because we agree with the State's first point, we need not reach the second. Deciding to admit a … number and was not only loaded but loaded with hollow point bullets. The prosecutor was fully justified in …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … On appeal, defendant raises the following contentions: POINT I CONTRARY TO THE TRIAL COURT'S ORDER DATED APRIL 11, … ELIGIBLE FOR THE TERMINATION OF MEGAN'S LAW REQUIREMENTS. POINT II CONTRARY TO THE TRIAL COURT'S ORDER DATED APRIL 11, …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … omission. On appeal, defendant raises two issues, arguing: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN CONCLUDING THAT THE POLICE … THE WARRANT APPLICATION WAS NOT DELIBERATE OR RECKLESS. POINT II 6 A-5871-17T4 THE WARRANT JUDGE WOULD NOT HAVE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … We already addressed the issue raised in D.A.'s first point in the companion appeal. Therefore, we now address the argument raised in D.A.s second point. N.J.A.C. 10:71-3.6 addresses change of county of …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … or vacate the judgment. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I THE JUDGE'S DECISION WAS ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS … ABSENCE AFTER SHE WAS INSTRUCTED NOT TO COME TO COURT. POINT II THE [JUDGE] NEVER TOOK THE TIME TO HEAR FROM THE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … We affirm. Defendant raises the following issues on appeal: POINT I: THE [PCR] COURT ERRED IN DENYING THE DEFENDANT'S … C. FAILURE OF PCR COURT TO CONDUCT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING. POINT II: THIS MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR FINDINGS OF FACT …
njcourts.gov
… has not filed a brief. PER CURIAM In this breach of contract case, plaintiff appeals from a July 16, 2019 … plaintiff raises the following arguments: 5 A-5295-18T1 [POINT I] THE [JUDGE] ERRED IN DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST … A JUDGMENT BASED ON LIES IS NOT A FAIR AND JUST ONE. [POINT II] THE JUDGMENT IS BASED ON THE FALSE ASSUMPTION THAT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … Defendant argued he was dissatisfied with his court appointed trial counsel. He also claimed no gun was recovered … is to ignore the truth of life, which is that anybody who points a gun or uses a gun toward another person is …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … challenges the denial of his PCR petition on two grounds: POINT I – THE COURT ERRED IN DENYING AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING … AGREEMENT THAT HE CHOSE TO ACCEPT ON ADVICE OF COUNSEL. POINT II – THE COURT SHOULD HAVE GRANTED AN EVIDENTIARY …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … FET. Hohsfield argues the following on appeal: POINT I THE PAROLE BOARD'S DECISION WAS ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS AND SHOULD BE OVERTURNED POINT II 5 A-1019-19 MR. HOHSFIELD'S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS WERE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … presents the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I THE SECOND FACTOR UNDER SILVER V. SILVER WAS NOT MET … to [S]eparate the [P]arties without [E]ntering a [FRO]. POINT II 4 A-2209-20 THE PREDICATE ACT OF SIMPLE ASSAULT WAS …