njcourts.gov
… ARLENE PATIRE; ROBERT COCHRANE; DSJ FAMILY TRUST; DANIEL P. CONTE, III, STACEY A. CONTE and JAMIE G. KRESHPANE, Trustees … Trust. On this appeal, plaintiffs present the following points of argument: POINT I THE APPROVAL OF THIS SITE PLAN, TOGETHER WITH FOUR …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … eight arguments through his counsel and several more points in a pro se brief. He did not appeal his sentence. In … Jones, testified before the jury in handcuffs. This point was not raised on direct appeal. Defendant's …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … Defendant presents the following arguments on appeal: POINT I: THE COURT ERRED BY EITHER WILLFULLY OR NEGLIGENTLY … ALLEGATIONS OF FORGED TRANSCRIPTS TO FEDERAL AUTHORITIES. POINT II: THE COURT HAS INCORRECTLY INTERPRETED THE LAW OF …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … In her brief, the mother raises the following points: POINT I: THE SIBLING RIGHTS OF [EMILY] AS WELL AS HER THREE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … in preparing for trial. He supported his argument by pointing out minor inconsistencies in the testimony of … trial counsel had cross- examined the witnesses thoroughly, pointing out such inconsistencies. The judge also noted that …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … defendant raises, through counsel, the following arguments: POINT I MCKOY WAS PREJUDICED AT HIS TRIAL ON THE … TO SANITIZE HIS PREDICATE OFFENSE. (Not raised below) POINT II WHEN MCKOY ASKED THE COURT WHY HE COULD NOT FIRE …
default
… appeals, which have been calendared together, appellants contend the Department of Health made numerous errors in its … to proceed with the ATC permitting process, several disappointed applicants appealed. Id. at 1. We concluded that the … Part B would be evaluated by a review committee on a 1000-point scale; the request listed the maximum points that …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … presents the following arguments for our consideration: POINT 1 COLLATERAL V. PROMISSORY DUE PROCESS [THE ALJ] MADE … BEFORE AN [ALJ] AND DENYING [ETHERIDGE] DUE PROCESS. POINT 2 [THE ALJ] MADE AN ERROR WHEN SHE FAILED TO ADDRESS …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … In his petition, defendant raised the following issues: POINT I TRIAL COUNSEL WAS CONSTITUTIONALLY DEFICIENT FOR … AND SEIZURES. U.S. CONST. AMEND IV; N.J. CONST. ART. 1, 7. POINT II 4 A-0754-18T2 TRIAL COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE DURING …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … written decision. We affirm. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I [DEFENDANT] IS ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON … AT SENTENCING, AND FOR FAILING TO INVESTIGATE PRETRIAL. POINT II [DEFENDANT'S] GUILTY [PLEA] MUST BE VACATED AS IT …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … entered the order under review. On appeal, Acevedo argues: POINT I THE [JUDGE'S] . . . DECISION REGARDING FORFEITURE OF … IS ULTRA VIRES AND NOT AUTHORIZED UNDER NEW JERSEY LAW. POINT II THE [JUDGE] . . . ERRED BECAUSE APPELLANT IS NOT …
njcourts.gov
… State has no objection to this request, which is made in point six of K.J.'s appellate brief. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … [K.J.] for a[n FPIC] is [denied]." K.J raises the following points on this appeal: POINT 1. THE COURT BELOW SHOULD BE …
default
… A. Adubato, Designated Counsel, on the brief). Yolanda Ciccone, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent … the insurer. Now on appeal, defendant raises the following points: POINT I THE DEFENDANT WAS DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … 14, 2019, plaintiff was hiking with a friend on the Rock Point Trail of Hartshorn Woods Park, which is owned and … presents the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I 7 A-1452-20 THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRE[TION] …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … On appeal, defendant raises the following arguments2: POINT I DOES N.J.S.A. 2C:43-6 (SENTENCE OF IMPRISONMENT FOR … ILLEGAL IMPOSED LIFE SENTENCE AS PRESENTLY STANDS. POINT II DOES NJ.S.A. 2C:43-7.2[](B) APPL[Y] AS WELL TO …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … brief, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I PRIOR TO TRIAL, AN ATTORNEY HAS AN ESPECIALLY … INVESTIGATE AVAILABLE DEFENSES THOROUGHLY AND COMPETENTLY. POINT II DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW. POINT III …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … 20, 2016. On appeal, plaintiffs raise the following issues: POINT I THE APPROVAL OF ESCO'S USE VARIANCE WAS TOTALLY … TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN, ZONE PLAN, AND ZONING ORDINANCE. POINT II ESCO DID NOT MEET THE REQUIRED STATUTORY AND CASE …
njcourts.gov
… court's October 21, 2016 denial of his petition for post-conviction relief ("PCR"). We affirm that denial in all but … brief on the present appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I DEFENDANT RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF PLEA …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … application. Now on appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I: The PTI Director Employed Per Se Policy to Reject …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … summary judgment, plaintiff asserts the following errors: POINT I THE [TRIAL] COURT ERRED IN GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO THE DEFENDANTS. POINT II FAMILY RELATIONSHIP DISCRIMINATION[,] COUNT IV OF …