njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … was needed based on a "single photo show up." The judge pointed out "the affidavit of probable cause attached to the … defendant to plead guilty." Defendant appeals, contending: POINT ONE THE PCR COURT ERRED WHEN IT FAILED TO GRANT …
njcourts.gov
… Division order denying his motion to amend his judgment of conviction by altering the NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE … appeal followed. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: 1 We affirmed his convictions … his original sentencing on the 2016 indictment. 4 A-3165-22 POINT I DEFENDANT ARGUES HE SHOULD HAVE HAD A HEARING …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … her] stand" and, if the party "fails to present all of the points on which he [or she] rests [their] case[,] [the … at some later stage in the same proceeding . . . argue points which [the party] has in effect abandoned." Ibid. …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … here. On this appeal, defendant presents the following points of argument: POINT I THE LAW DIVISION ERRED IN FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … this record, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I THE COURT ERRED BY DENYING THE PTI APPEAL MOTION WITHOUT A HEARING AND SOLELY ON PROCEDURAL GROUNDS. POINT II THE PROSECUTOR'S REJECTION OF NURSE'S PTI …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … arguments. 5 A-2644-18T3 On appeal, appellant raises two points: POINT I ALL THE ELEMENTS NECESSARY FOR A CLAIM OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … to deter fighting. II. Petitioner raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I REQUEST TO VACATE ADJUDICATION MUST BE GRANTED, …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … raise the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO VACATE DEFAULT JUDGMENT. POINT II DEFENDANT[S'] MOTION TO VACATE WAS FILED IN A …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … fifteen-page written opinion. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I THE PCR [JUDGE] ERRED IN FAILING TO FIND THAT THE … HEARING VIOLATED DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS. POINT II THE PCR [JUDGE] ERRONEOUSLY APPLIED PROCEDURAL BARS …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … presents the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I TRIAL COURT ERRED IN GRANTING SUMMARY JUDG[]MENT TO … 5 A-1171-20 AUGUST 9, 2009[,] AND WAS ONE TRANSACTION. POINT II TRIAL COURT ERRED IN APPLYING THE LAW ACCORDING TO …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … This appeal followed. Defendant now raises the following points for our consideration: 6 A-3626-19 POINT I []DEFENDANT DID NOT ADMIT TO ALL OF THE NECESSARY …
njcourts.gov
… V. Molitor, Designated Counsel, on the brief). Yolanda Ciccone, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent … II. On appeal, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I DEFENDANT IS ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON … INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF PCR COUNSEL. (NOT RAISED BELOW). POINT II THIS COURT SHOULD REVERSE THE TRIAL COURT'S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … 3 A-3250-20 POINT I THE ACRIMONY IN THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE USED BY THE PLAINTIFF TO GET A LEG UP IN THE DIVORCE MATTER. POINT II THE COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR ON THE LAW …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … presented to the PCR judge. Defendant contends: POINT ONE THE IMPOSITION OF [CSL] MUST BE ELIMINATED FROM [DEFENDANT'S] SENTENCE. POINT TWO IN THE ALTERNATIVE, [DEFENDANT] IS ENTITLED TO AN …
njcourts.gov
… the above referenced property (Subject). Plaintiff’s owner contends that the signature on the return receipt (commonly … of the assessment. Ibid., Ocean Pines, Ltd. v. Borough of Point Pleasant, 112 N.J. 1 (1988). Since the loss of appeal … mail. The P.O. Box has restricted access, as the Borough points out. To claim certified mail, additional steps are …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Act, N.J.S.A. 52:4C-1 to -7. Defendants raise the following points on appeal: 3 A-4475-17T4 POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN HOLDING THAT THE STATE'S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … misconduct; (4) malicious prosecution; and (5) any other points assigned counsel deems relevant. The court assigned … Defendant now appeals, raising the following arguments: POINT ONE THIS MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR AN EVIDENTIARY …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … 2003, January 2005, June 2009 and October 2009,2 arguing: POINT I THE FIVE-YEAR PROCEDURAL BAR FOR THE FILING OF A … PROCEDURAL BAR SHOULD NOT APPLY DUE TO EXCUSABLE NEGLECT. POINT II THE DEFENDANT WAS DENIED EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF …
njcourts.gov
… without an evidentiary hearing, his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR). In his petition, NOT FOR … robbery convictions. He raises two arguments on appeal: POINT ONE MR. BROWN IS ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON … TO ARGUE ADEQUATELY FOR MITIGATING FACTORS AT SENTENCING. POINT TWO THE PCR COURT ERRONEOUSLY RULED THAT MR. BROWN'S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … petitioner filed a notice of appeal, raising the following points: POINT I PETITIONER HAS OVERCOME THE PRESUMPTIION OF VALIDITY …