njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213, along the nineteen access points. In December 2012, the Borough Council presented its … rather, the beach can only be accessed at select access points that have stairs and ramps for patrons to use to walk …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … his convictions and sentence. He presents the following points of argument: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT SHOULD HAVE GRANTED MR. PEREZ’S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … On appeal, appellant raises the following issues: POINT 1: THE DECISION TO CHARACTERIZE NGOMBE WAJAGGA'S … N.J. Court Rules, cmt. 5 on R. 2:6-2 (2019). 5 A-5738-17T4 POINT 2: THE ADMINISTRATOR'S FAILURE TO ADDRESS THE MERITS …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … the denial of both motions, raising the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE GRAND JURY PRESENTATION FOR THIS ONE[-]COUNT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … makes the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I APPELLANT SHOULD NOT BE PROCEDURALLY BARRED FROM … AGAINST PCR COUNSEL: [SIC] NOT AGAINST TRIAL COUNSEL. POINT II PETITIONER RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF PCR …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … defendant presents three arguments for our consideration: POINT I – DEFENDANT'S PCR PETITION SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN TIME-BARRED. POINT II – THIS MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR AN EVIDENTIARY …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … of the evidence.2 On appeal, appellant raises two points: POINT I: APPELLANT WAS DENIED RIGHTS TO DUE PROCESS AND …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … This appeal followed, with defendant raising the following points of argument: POINT I IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, [DEFENDANT'S] PCR CLAIM …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … raises the following issues for our consideration: POINT I THE STATE FAILED TO PROVE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT … DEFENDANT WAS GUILTY OF A VIOLATION OF N.J.S.A. 39:4- 97.3. POINT II THE POLICE OFFICER LACKED PROBABLE CAUSE TO STOP [] …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … judgment of conviction, raising the following single point for our consideration: BECAUSE THE COURT ERRED IN … 157 N.J. 463, 470 (1999))). In support, Judge Rodriguez pointed to the fact that defendant was "traveling at a high …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … driving, N.J.S.A. 39:4-96. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I: DEFENDANT WAS DENIED DUE PROCESS AND A FAIR TRIAL … AMENDS. V AND XIV; N.J. CONST., ART. I, PARS. 1, 9, & 10. POINT II: PROSECUTORIAL ERROR IN SUMMATION FURTHER …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … appeal followed. On appeal, defendant raises the following point headings for our consideration: POINT I: THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FINDING THAT DEFENDANT'S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the following arguments for this court's consideration: POINT I THE [PCR JUDGE] ERRED IN DENYING THE DEFENDANT'S … to His Case and Thereby Render Him Ineligible for [ISP]. POINT II THE MATTER SHOULD BE REMANDED FOR AN AMENDED …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … was three months and ten days late. The judge further pointed out that defendant failed to provide an affidavit or … petition . . . . Before us, defendant argues: 7 A-4150-18 POINT I TRIAL DEFENSE COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE BY FAILING TO …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … and criminal history. Defendant raises the following points on appeal: POINT I. APPELLANT IS NOT BARRED FROM RELIEF UNDER RULE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … 2019. This appeal followed. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED, AND ABUSED ITS DISCRETION … DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR DISMISSAL 5 A-5265-18 POINT II THE TRIAL COURT ERRED, AND ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … not reiterate them again here, except for the following points that are relevant to the issues presented in the … he unsuccessfully pursued in the Law Division. He argues: POINT I THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT'S SECOND …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … to support his allegations and his arguments on these three points were belied by the record. Specifically, the judge … to Judge Ironson and Judge Amirata. Defendant contends: POINT I BECAUSE [DEFENDANT] RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … presents the following issues for our consideration . POINT ONE THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING [DEFENDANT'S] … FOR TRIAL AND PRESSURED [DEFENDANT] TO PLEAD GUILTY. POINT TWO THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING [DEFENDANT'S] …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … October 31, 2019. He raises the following issues on appeal. POINT I ALL OF DEFENDANT'S STATEMENTS AT THE SCENE OF HIS … OF CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION WITHOUT A VALID MIRANDA1 WAIVER. POINT II THE COURT IMPROPERLY PUNISHED DEFENDANT FOR HIS …