-
2C:41-2a
Charges Document PDF
njcourts.gov
… activities of which affect trade or commerce. In order to convict defendant of the charge, the State must prove the … 2C:41-1a(1) was amended in 1995, 1999, 2003, 2005 and 2007 to add various crimes to those eligible for … of any one class, or does not, either in law or in fact, empower the holders of the securities to elect one or more …
-
A-3/4/5-24 Petition For Certification Spraulding
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… App. Div. Docket No. A-5095-18 Your Honors: James Fair confessed to murdering Jonelle Melton not once, not twice, not three times, but four separate times. He confessed to committing the murder with multiple other … (emphasis added); State v. Loftin, 191 N.J. 172, 187 (2007) (“Our jurisprudence requires that a juror who has …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … followed. On appeal, defendant presents the following points for our consideration: POINT I BECAUSE DEFENDANT MET HIS BURDEN TO ESTABLISH A CASE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … appellant raises the following arguments in his brief: POINT I THE PAROLE [BOARD] DENYING PLAINTIFF PAROLE BECAUSE … VIOLATES HIS CONSTITUTIONAL DUE PROCESS RIGHTS. 4 A-0663-23 POINT II THE PAROLE BOARD ACTED ARBITRARILY AND CAPRICIOUSLY …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … SLC is not a party to this appeal. 2 Plaintiff's point headings fail to "include in parentheses at the end of the point heading the place in the record where the opinion or …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … also claimed counsel withheld discovery from him. Appointed PCR counsel filed a supplemental brief arguing the … reprises the same issues he raised before the PCR court: POINT ONE DEFENDANT DEMONSTRATED A PRIMA FACIE CLAIM FOR …
njcourts.gov
… E. Braun, Designated Counsel, on the brief). Yolanda Ciccone, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent … [the sexual assaults] with Detective Jones." Defendant pointed out that Detective Jones had denied interviewing … makes two arguments, which he articulates as follows: POINT I – DEFENDANT IS ENTITLED TO A NEW TRIAL BECAUSE OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … makes two arguments, which he articulates as follows: POINT I – THE CONVICTION AS TO COUNTS TWENTY-NINE AND THIRTY … TO THE PROSECUTION'S NOT COMPLYING WITH N.J.S.A. 2C:38-2e. POINT II – THIS MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR AN EVIDENTIARY …
njcourts.gov
… Burroughs, Designated Counsel, on the briefs). Yolanda Ciccone, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent … Defendant appeals the PCR denial, raising the following points: POINT I AS DEFENDANT HAD SHOWN THAT HE RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … N.J. 359 (2022). In his moving papers, defendant sought appointment of counsel to expound upon the issues raised. On … for counsel. On appeal, defendant raises the following point for our consideration: POINT I RESENTENCING SHOULD …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the following three arguments for our consideration: POINT I – THE COURT BELOW ERRED IN FINDING BEYOND A … WAS NOT SUPPORTED BY SUFFICIENT INDEPENDENT PROOF POINT II – THE COURT BELOW ERRED IN ACCEPTING THE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … construe the stipulation in context as plaintiffs "[a]t no point . . . contemplated [they] would voluntarily give up … grace period would be reasonable. 6 A-2561-22 end point, and from there the [sixty]-day period would begin to …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … raises the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT'S SECOND … AND THE MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. POINT II PETITIONER HAS ESTABLISHED A PRIMA FACIE SHOWING …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … in a later PCR proceeding. 3 A-0322-22 The trial court appointed defendant's former public defender as standby … On appeal, defendant raises the following contentions: POINT 1: STANDBY COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE FOR NOT TIMELY …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the trial," Spence "never approached" trial counsel "at any point before or during the trial." Further, the judge … II. On appeal, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I TRIAL COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE AND PURSUE AN …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Defendant was simply sitting in his car drinking to the point of passing out if they do not comport with common … raises the following issues for our consideration: POINT I THE STATE FAILED TO PROVE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … appeal followed. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT ONE THE PCR COURT ERRED WHEN IT FAILED TO GRANT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … August 11, 2022. On appeal, Hartford makes two arguments: POINT I THE JUDGE'S ORDERS ON MAY 7, 2019 VIOLATED … THE [HARTFORD] DUE PROCESS RIGHTS. (Not raised below) POINT II THE PETITIONER WAS NOT IN THE COURSE AND SCOPE OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … the court concluded that an evidentiary hearing on this point was not warranted. On August 17, 2017, the court … appeal followed. Defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN PROCEEDING WITH ORAL …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … remand to decide the matter on the merits. 6 A-2252-17T3 POINT I AS THE PCR COURT MISAPPREHENDED PETITIONER'S CLAIM, THAT MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR A NEW HEARING. POINT II AS THERE ARE GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACTS IN …