njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. State …
njcourts.gov
… v. Macon, 57 N.J. 325, 338 (1971). Confrontation Clause violations are not immune from a harmless error analysis. …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3278-22 ALONZO HILL, currently incarcerated at New Jersey State Prison in Trenton, New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, public agency formed under the …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0981-17T2 IN THE MATTER OF STEVEN HOTZ, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. ______________________________ Argued January 28, 2020 – Decided February 13, 2020 Before Judges Yannotti, Currier …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1604-18T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DAMARY DIAZ, a/k/a DAMARIS DIAZ and DAMARY DIAZ-TELEDO, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Submitted December 1, 2020 – …
njcourts.gov
… and dismissed defendants' counterclaims sounding in violations of the Dodd Frank Act (DFA), Truth in Lending Act … and noted that defendants' arguments were based on alleged violations of Regulation Z, and particularly 12 C.F.R. § … that Judge Weaver failed to consider plaintiff's purported violations of federal law and regulations. Defendants appear …
njcourts.gov
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE COMMITTEE ON OPINONS JOSEPH SILVESTRI, Plaintiff(s) vs. BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, Defendant(s). SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: BERGEN COUNTY DOCKET NO. BER-L-848-19 CIVIL ACTION OPINION Argued: …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1875-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DASEAN K. HARPER, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted October 26, 2022 – Decided November 10, 2022 Before Judges Accurso, …
njcourts.gov
… the court did not consider these acts as constitutional violations that would pose a "serious risk to the health and … a class action lawsuit, asserting various claims including, violations of the TCA. Those plaintiffs also sought …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0623-15T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GREGORY TANASHIAN, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ Argued October 24, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and …
njcourts.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5570-09T2 CAROL VALENTINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. THE BOROUGH OF WOODCLIFF LAKE, Defendant-Respondent. …
-
njcourts.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5570-09T2 CAROL VALENTINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. THE BOROUGH OF WOODCLIFF LAKE, Defendant-Respondent. …
-
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. State …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1875-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DASEAN K. HARPER, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted October 26, 2022 – Decided November 10, 2022 Before Judges Accurso, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0623-15T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GREGORY TANASHIAN, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ Argued October 24, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and …
-
njcourts.gov
… the court did not consider these acts as constitutional violations that would pose a "serious risk to the health and … a class action lawsuit, asserting various claims including, violations of the TCA. Those plaintiffs also sought …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0981-17T2 IN THE MATTER OF STEVEN HOTZ, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. ______________________________ Argued January 28, 2020 – Decided February 13, 2020 Before Judges Yannotti, Currier …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1604-18T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DAMARY DIAZ, a/k/a DAMARIS DIAZ and DAMARY DIAZ-TELEDO, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Submitted December 1, 2020 – …
-
njcourts.gov
… and dismissed defendants' counterclaims sounding in violations of the Dodd Frank Act (DFA), Truth in Lending Act … and noted that defendants' arguments were based on alleged violations of Regulation Z, and particularly 12 C.F.R. § … that Judge Weaver failed to consider plaintiff's purported violations of federal law and regulations. Defendants appear …
-
njcourts.gov
… v. Macon, 57 N.J. 325, 338 (1971). Confrontation Clause violations are not immune from a harmless error analysis. …