-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 16, 2021 – Decided March 30, 2021 Before Judges Haas, Mawla and Natali. On appeal from the State Health Benefits Commission. Lauren Sandy, attorney for appellant. Gurbir S. … worked for ten months at the Somerset County Prosecutor's Office. During this period, he was enrolled in the Public …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0638-24 EARLE ASPHALT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER, … issued a notice that sealed bids would be received on July 30, 2024, for a County project. As relevant here, the bid … of reasons and the County's retention of Earle's bid bond offered no solace. We add that the analysis does not require …
-
njcourts.gov
… period in which a party must demand a trial de novo commences only when the court provides a copy of the award … Gillespie, Inc., 194 N.J. 596, 606 (2008) and Robertelli v. Office of Attorney Ethics, 224 N.J. 470, 483 (2016). This … for Dispute Resolution Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-1 through -30, was enacted "'to provide a speedier and less expensive …
njcourts.gov
… this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. 2 … the Township of Pemberton, County of Burlington, filed a complaint against defendant for damages incurred because of … (App. Div. Dec. 14, 2023), cert. denied, 256 N.J. 530 (2024). 4 A-1553-23 asserts he requested a postponement …
njcourts.gov
… Ronald Coscia appeals from an order dismissing his complaint against defendant CHW Group, Inc., doing business … "Common Questions" section advised that "[c]overage begins 30 days after enrollment and receipt of applicable contract … L.P., 219 N.J. 430, 446 (2014), our review is de novo. Goffe v. Foulke Mgmt. Corp., 238 N.J. 191, 207 (2019). On …
default
… March 12, 2019 – Decided April 11, 2019 Before Judges Hoffman and Suter. On appeal from Superior Court of New … tuition owed, $21,400, and a May 9, 2016 due date.2 On May 30, 2017, plaintiff received defendants' check paying the … is denied "only where the party opposing the motion has come forward with evidence that creates a genuine issue as …
njcourts.gov
… ________________________________ Submitted August 30, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Rothstadt and Vernoia. On … Family Part, Monmouth County, Docket No. FV-13-1301-16. Law Offices of Jef Henninger, attorneys for appellant (Mr. … their respective jobs at approximately 4:00 p.m. Prior to coming home, defendant had been drinking at a local bar. …
njcourts.gov
… entering a judgment of no cause of action, dismissing their complaint after a jury trial. We find no merit in … injury to her neck and back from a motor vehicle accident, offering medical expert testimony that she suffered … Sanchez's claims were dismissed by an order entered June 30, 2015, which is not the subject of this appeal; only the …
njcourts.gov
… 150 counts of the indictment, which related to sexual acts committed against one child victim, were severed by request … counsel for defendant obtained permission from the Office of the Public Defender (OPD) to allow defendant to be … counts presented. Defendant appeared for sentencing on May 30, 2008. The judge heard from the victim's father, both …
default
… 12, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the New Jersey Department of … finding him guilty of prohibited act *.259, failure to comply with an order to submit a specimen for prohibited … cups of water, but stated he was unable to void at both 10:30 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. At approximately 11:15 a.m., …
default
… this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. 2 … 29, 2020 Law Division orders dismissing their class action complaints as barred by the entire controversy doctrine. … of funds collected by defendants. 2 As codified in Rule 4:30A, with exceptions not applicable here, "[n]on-joinder of …
njcourts.gov
… Law Division order denying their motion to reinstate their complaint against defendants Brian Opatosky and Deanne … and Gene Reagan; the Opatoskys' answer is dated August 30, 2013.1 The dispute centered on the Munleys' discovery, … the law firm, which later reformulated into two separate offices, on November 28, 2017, plaintiffs' counsel wrote …
njcourts.gov
… ________________________ Submitted October 30, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Koblitz and Mawla. On … to testify at the suppression hearing were Elizabeth police officer Edward Benenati, Jr. and defendant. Benenati … to a call of a domestic dispute. The defendant is seen coming from the direction of an apartment occupied by a …
njcourts.gov
… Mark S. Hochman argued the cause for respondent (Law Offices of Stephen E. Gertler, attorneys; Mark S. Hochman, … order de novo. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Boylan, 307 N.J. Super. 162, 167 (App. Div. 1998). Under Rule … was water. But an employee admitted that the Salon offered complimentary bottled water to its customers. Indeed, before …
-
njcourts.gov
… this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. 2 … 29, 2020 Law Division orders dismissing their class action complaints as barred by the entire controversy doctrine. … of funds collected by defendants. 2 As codified in Rule 4:30A, with exceptions not applicable here, "[n]on-joinder of …
-
2C:14-2c(3)
Charges Document PDF
njcourts.gov
… pertinent part: An actor is guilty of sexual assault if he commits an act of sexual penetration with another person … only the age of the (name of victim) at the time of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. It does not have to prove … or disciplinary power over the victim. 8 N.J.S.A. 30:4C-26.4. 9 These factors are suggested by Hardwicke v. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Law Division order denying their motion to reinstate their complaint against defendants Brian Opatosky and Deanne … and Gene Reagan; the Opatoskys' answer is dated August 30, 2013.1 The dispute centered on the Munleys' discovery, … the law firm, which later reformulated into two separate offices, on November 28, 2017, plaintiffs' counsel wrote …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 8, 2020 – Decided January 30, 2020 Before Judges Fuentes, Haas and Enright. On appeal … substantially for the reasons set forth in the Agency's comprehensive and well-reasoned written decision, which is … the Agency's decision. The matter was transferred to the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) for a hearing as a …
-
njcourts.gov
… March 12, 2019 – Decided April 11, 2019 Before Judges Hoffman and Suter. On appeal from Superior Court of New … tuition owed, $21,400, and a May 9, 2016 due date.2 On May 30, 2017, plaintiff received defendants' check paying the … is denied "only where the party opposing the motion has come forward with evidence that creates a genuine issue as …
-
njcourts.gov
… Mark S. Hochman argued the cause for respondent (Law Offices of Stephen E. Gertler, attorneys; Mark S. Hochman, … order de novo. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Boylan, 307 N.J. Super. 162, 167 (App. Div. 1998). Under Rule … was water. But an employee admitted that the Salon offered complimentary bottled water to its customers. Indeed, before …