Filters
- MOHAMMED JALOUDI VS. NJHR1, LLC, ET AL. (L-3020-18, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the parties discussed their positions on the case. At one point the judge stated: I certainly have enough [issues of … certainly genuine issues of material fact at least at this point. The court entered two orders denying both motions, …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … of plaintiff's recovery. In fact, as plaintiff's brief points out, the jury's $80,000 lost wages award is roughly … discovery-related matters). Moreover, as plaintiff's brief points out, the collateral source rule codified at N.J.S.A. …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … without an evidentiary hearing. Defendant appeals, arguing: POINT I THIS MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR AN EVIDENTIARY … CASE OF TRIAL COUNSEL'S INEFFECTIVENESS. 3 A-0979-22 SUBPOINT A Trial Counsel Elicited Unduly Prejudicial Testimony …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JAMEEL ROLLINS (09-01-0262, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … arrived home during the incident and one of the defendants pointed a gun at her while the other struck Mann in the head … raises the following arguments for our consideration. POINT I: THE JUDGE ERRED BY FAILING TO CORRECT DEFENDANT'S …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JOHN A. DENOFA (01-05-0600, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … articulates his arguments on this appeal as follows: POINT I: THE PCR COURT'S FINDINGS THAT THERE WERE NO … Petition and 2021 Petition Were Inconsistent. 7 A-0281-22 POINT II: THIS COURT SHOULD REMAND FOR RESENTENCING BECAUSE …
- MANIDIPA KAPAS VS. ABHIJIT NEOGY (FM-12-1546-11, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … 140 N.J. 366, 378 (1995)). 2 Because each of plaintiff's point headings listed in her table of contents cite to her … citation to the trial record should have followed each point heading in plaintiff's brief. Nonetheless, we consider …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CARLA S. CARABALLO (17-05-0411, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … wheelchair and scrolled through her cell phone. At one point, defendant stated to E.P., "I told you if you fell I … had been warned. In defendant's favor, the State pointed to the following N.J.S.A. 2C:43- 12(e) factors for …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … had not served an affidavit of merit (AOM) at that point, so the judge extended the deadline until October 27, … It suffices to say that plaintiff never raised the point in the trial court. Nieder v. Royal Indem. Ins. Co., …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … May 25, 2018 order. The Case Information Statement (CIS) points to orders on May 25, 2018, March 29, 2018, February … the door open while Negron effectuated service, at which point Yu threw the documents out of her home. When service …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MARTI WOODWARD (16-11-1138, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … of parole ineligibility. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I FAILURE TO PROVIDE AN INSTRUCTION TO THE JURY … DUE PROCESS AND A FAIR TRIAL. (Partially Raised Below). POINT II RESENTENCING IS REQUIRED BECAUSE THE COURT …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … makes two arguments, which he articulates as follows: POINT ONE – MR. WOODS IS ENTITLED TO RELIEF ON HIS CLAIM THAT COUNSEL FAILED TO FILE A NOTICE OF APPEAL. POINT TWO – MR. WOODS I[S] ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY …
- JOSE CAMILO VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD (NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the same reasons. Before us, Camilo argues the following point: POINT I THE DECISION OF THE PAROLE BOARD TO DENY PAROLE MUST …
- D.S. VS. G.S. (FV-14-0271-19, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … immediate harm. On appeal, defendant raises the following point for this court's consideration: POINT I AS A MATTER OF LAW, THE [JUDGE] ERRONEOUSLY GRANTED …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. SHARDAI L. SANTOS (16-12-3331, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … makes the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I THE PTI APPLICATION SHOULD BE RECONSIDERED BECAUSE … ALONE VALID ONES – FOR WITHHOLDING CONSENT TO ENTER PTI. POINT II THE FIVE-YEAR PROBATIONARY SENTENCE WAS MANIFESTLY …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … The home is occupied by Rabbi Menachen M. Lewis, the appointed rabbi and president of Chabad. Chabad's congregation … raises the following arguments for our consideration: POINT ONE THE ACTIONS OF THE BOROUGH ASSESSOR IN DENYING THE …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … raises the following contentions for our consideration: POINT I BECAUSE DEFENSE COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE BY NOT … RELIEF WITHOUT CONDUCTING AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING. POINT II BECAUSE THE PETITIONER MADE A PRIMA FACIE SHOWING …
- TEOFILO GUZMAN VS. EAST COAST TOYOTA (DC-009113-19, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … a written amplification. In the amplification, the court pointed out that defendant did not support its motion with a … defendant's procedural argument. The trial court correctly points out that defendant failed to support its motion by …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. RAHEIM M. SUMMERS (17-09-0685, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … for first- degree murder, N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3(a),1 arguing: POINT I THE [MOTION JUDGE] ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT'S RULE … was having a deleterious impact on his health. The judge pointed to the voluminous medical and dental records …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CARLOS ROJAS (12-09-1046, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … comprehensive written opinion. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I THE TRIAL [JUDGE] ABUSED [HIS] DISCRETION IN DENYING … to his other clients than to defendant; counsel cancelled appointments with her; counsel failed to deliver the notice of …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … with the appellant raising the following arguments: POINT I APPELLANT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN FOUND GUILTY POINT II THE HEARING OFFICER RELIED ON CUSTODY STAFF'S WORD …