-
8.21
Charges Document PDF
njcourts.gov
… Revised 11/2022) As I told you earlier2, defendant’s contention that plaintiff was not wearing a seatbelt is not … about deciding if defendant has proven each of these three points to you. You may note that each of these points is set out on the jury verdict sheet as questions …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Patiounga raises the following arguments: 5 A-1137-24 POINT I THE DISCIPLINARY HEARING OFFICER ERRED IN THE … DDP (DRUG DIVSERSON PROGRAM) AT NORTHERN STATE PRISON. POINT II THE DISCIPLINARY HEARING OFFICER VIOLATED THE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … in the first grade in September 2006", because at that point she "no longer required work-related childcare." He … not need childcare when she commenced first grade. On this point, the court clearly credited plaintiff's testimony that …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … followed. On appeal, defendant presents the following points for our consideration: POINT I BECAUSE DEFENDANT MET HIS BURDEN TO ESTABLISH A CASE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … appellant raises the following arguments in his brief: POINT I THE PAROLE [BOARD] DENYING PLAINTIFF PAROLE BECAUSE … VIOLATES HIS CONSTITUTIONAL DUE PROCESS RIGHTS. 4 A-0663-23 POINT II THE PAROLE BOARD ACTED ARBITRARILY AND CAPRICIOUSLY …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … SLC is not a party to this appeal. 2 Plaintiff's point headings fail to "include in parentheses at the end of the point heading the place in the record where the opinion or …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … also claimed counsel withheld discovery from him. Appointed PCR counsel filed a supplemental brief arguing the … reprises the same issues he raised before the PCR court: POINT ONE DEFENDANT DEMONSTRATED A PRIMA FACIE CLAIM FOR …
njcourts.gov
… E. Braun, Designated Counsel, on the brief). Yolanda Ciccone, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent … [the sexual assaults] with Detective Jones." Defendant pointed out that Detective Jones had denied interviewing … makes two arguments, which he articulates as follows: POINT I – DEFENDANT IS ENTITLED TO A NEW TRIAL BECAUSE OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … makes two arguments, which he articulates as follows: POINT I – THE CONVICTION AS TO COUNTS TWENTY-NINE AND THIRTY … TO THE PROSECUTION'S NOT COMPLYING WITH N.J.S.A. 2C:38-2e. POINT II – THIS MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR AN EVIDENTIARY …
njcourts.gov
… Burroughs, Designated Counsel, on the briefs). Yolanda Ciccone, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent … Defendant appeals the PCR denial, raising the following points: POINT I AS DEFENDANT HAD SHOWN THAT HE RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … N.J. 359 (2022). In his moving papers, defendant sought appointment of counsel to expound upon the issues raised. On … for counsel. On appeal, defendant raises the following point for our consideration: POINT I RESENTENCING SHOULD …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the following three arguments for our consideration: POINT I – THE COURT BELOW ERRED IN FINDING BEYOND A … WAS NOT SUPPORTED BY SUFFICIENT INDEPENDENT PROOF POINT II – THE COURT BELOW ERRED IN ACCEPTING THE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … construe the stipulation in context as plaintiffs "[a]t no point . . . contemplated [they] would voluntarily give up … grace period would be reasonable. 6 A-2561-22 end point, and from there the [sixty]-day period would begin to …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … raises the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT'S SECOND … AND THE MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. POINT II PETITIONER HAS ESTABLISHED A PRIMA FACIE SHOWING …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … in a later PCR proceeding. 3 A-0322-22 The trial court appointed defendant's former public defender as standby … On appeal, defendant raises the following contentions: POINT 1: STANDBY COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE FOR NOT TIMELY …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the trial," Spence "never approached" trial counsel "at any point before or during the trial." Further, the judge … II. On appeal, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I TRIAL COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE AND PURSUE AN …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Defendant was simply sitting in his car drinking to the point of passing out if they do not comport with common … raises the following issues for our consideration: POINT I THE STATE FAILED TO PROVE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … appeal followed. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT ONE THE PCR COURT ERRED WHEN IT FAILED TO GRANT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … August 11, 2022. On appeal, Hartford makes two arguments: POINT I THE JUDGE'S ORDERS ON MAY 7, 2019 VIOLATED … THE [HARTFORD] DUE PROCESS RIGHTS. (Not raised below) POINT II THE PETITIONER WAS NOT IN THE COURSE AND SCOPE OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … the court concluded that an evidentiary hearing on this point was not warranted. On August 17, 2017, the court … appeal followed. Defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN PROCEEDING WITH ORAL …