default
… the Spill Act. Id. at 301-03. In particular, we noted prior decisions that recognized the standing of parties "affected … recognized the right of third parties to challenge DEP's decisions, id. at 299-300, if they have "a sufficient … N.J. 163, 171 4 Rosengarten cites to one of our unpublished decisions in support of this proposition. Not only are …
default
… the Association contends PERC's decision "throws [previous] decisions and regulations into chaos," citing to statutes, …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2061-16T4 IN THE MATTER OF ROBERTO LOPEZ, JR., CITY OF CAMDEN. _______________________ Argued November 9, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli, Whipple and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the New …
default
… broad powers to decide issues of fact and law, and their decisions "are given collateral estoppel effect by reviewing …
default
… element of the crime charged." The court's oral and written decisions did not expressly address the "secured from the …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-6014-17T1 L.M., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES, Respondent-Respondent. __________________________ Argued February 6, 2020 – Decided April 30, 2020 …
njcourts.gov
… Tasca was decided after the Board rendered its final agency decisions that are in question here, we see no value in … remanding these matters for the Board to reconsider their decisions, as they are consistent with Tasca. 3 The …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5301-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. N.L.S., Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________ IN THE MATTER OF THE …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2045-19 DZEMAL SEFEDINI, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and JO JOS ITALIAN GRILLE, LLC, Respondents. __________________________ Submitted November 15, 2021 – Decided December …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1806-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KEVIN M. COLVELL, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Submitted September 16, 2025 – Decided September 26, 2025 Before Judges Rose …
-
njcourts.gov
… broad powers to decide issues of fact and law, and their decisions "are given collateral estoppel effect by reviewing …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4702-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Z.J.C. and D.E.A., Defendants, and K.S., Defendant-Appellant. …
-
njcourts.gov
… attorney's fees. We quote more extensively from the judge's decisions in the relevant section of this opinion. There was …
-
njcourts.gov
… I. "[We] have 'a limited role' in the review of [agency] decisions." In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. 182, 194 (2011) … 5th ed. 1999). Although the reported New Jersey appellate decisions involving chain of custody issues have all been …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3355-15T4 DONNA ROBERTS and DAWN ABRAMS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CLIFFORD S. MINTZ, Defendant-Respondent. ___________________________________ Argued September 18, 2017 – Decided Before Judges …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-6014-17T1 L.M., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES, Respondent-Respondent. __________________________ Argued February 6, 2020 – Decided April 30, 2020 …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1953-15T3 KATHRYN ROBINSON, Petitioner-Respondent, v. FIRST ENERGY CORPORATION, Respondent-Appellant. __________________________ Argued February 7, 2018 - Decided Before Judges Alvarez, Nugent …
-
njcourts.gov
… 59:2-3(d).] Accordingly, "operational governmental decisions to devote existing resources to one activity at …
-
njcourts.gov
… argue that the Fieldstone Condominium Association’s Board decisions are authorized by statute, the master deed, and … of protection of the business judgment rule, so long as the decisions are made in good faith. The New Jersey Supreme … judgment rule is a means of “shielding internal business decisions from second-guessing by the courts. Under the …
-
njcourts.gov
… verified complaint and order to show cause; contending the decisions violated the laws governing PIP benefits. The …