njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … supporting the State's applications. Defense counsel also pointed out that, for years, the Hudson County Prosecutor's … about the purported difficulty of producing discovery, pointing out the availability of electronic communication …
-
njcourts.gov
… hereby incorporated herein by reference. The Court having considered the recommendations of common benefit liaison … such application, double spaced and with no smaller than 12 point type. Exhibits are not expected, and lengthy exhibits … of no more than 3 pages, double spaced, no less than 12-point type, to the Court, with a copy to common benefit …
-
njcourts.gov
… 2004 meeting revisited Standard 3.1 because of an apparent conflict between the commentary thereto and the application … the fact that the Judicial Council did not focus on this point in its earlier consideration of the standards, the Council was asked to revisit this particular point and determine whether Standard 3.1 and the …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … imposed the same fines. II. Defendant raises the following point on appeal: THE COURT'S FAILURE TO ADJOURN TRIAL IN … on the day of trial. He candidly conceded that he could not point to any prejudice but claimed he was not aware of . . . …
njcourts.gov
… September 17, 2025 Before Judges Rose and Torregrossa-O'Connor. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law … Paul "did not testify that he was a certified EMT at any point in his testimony." Viewing the evidence in the light … reprises the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I THE [PCR] COURT ERRED IN DENYING . . . DEFENDANT'S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … [defendant] was clearly at the 6 A-0539-23 party at some point in time, the witnesses were not able to credibly … Defendant now appeals, raising the following points for our consideration: POINT I DEFENDANT ESTABLISHED, …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … by competent counsel and arraigned . . . at which point she was advised of her constitutional rights and the … appeal followed. On appeal, defendant raises the following point for our consideration: POINT ONE THE HOLDING IN STATE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the arguments asserted before the judge, contending: POINT I DEFENDANT WAS DENIED THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF … Plea of Guilty was not Entered Knowingly and Intelligently. POINT II DEFENDANT'S PLEA SHOULD BE WITHDRAWN AS IT WAS NOT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … appeal followed in which defendant raises the following points: POINT I TRIAL COURT ERRED BY NOT CONSIDER[ING] THE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … money, and then defendant went into his house. At that point, Shaub alerted the other troopers who were nearby to … appeal followed.1 Defendant makes the following arguments. POINT I THE WARRANTLESS ENTRY INTO DEFENDANT'S HOME VIOLATED …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Defendant raises the following arguments on appeal. POINT I THE [COURT] ERRED WHEN IT DETERMINED THAT … THE SENTENCE WAS NOT ILLEGAL NOR RETROACTIVELY APPLICABLE. POINT II THE [COURT] ERRED WHEN IT FAILED TO ADDRESS AND …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … makes two arguments, which he articulates as follows: POINT ONE – THE PCR COURT ERRED IN CONCLUDING THAT … OF THE TIME BAR WOULD RESULT IN A FUNDAMENTAL INJUSTICE. POINT TWO – DEFENDANT WAS ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … followed. On appeal, defendants present the following points for our consideration: 4 A-3499-17T4 POINT I THE TRIAL COURT DECISION BELOW SHOULD BE REVERSED …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … an evidentiary hearing. II Defendant appeals, arguing: POINT I TRIAL DEFENSE COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO … DEFENDANT TO ABANDON HIS ORIGINAL DESIRE TO GO TO TRIAL. POINT II TRIAL COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO RAISE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … makes two arguments, which he articulates as follows: POINT I – THE PCR COURT ERRED IN RULING THAT [R.T.'S] … PETITION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF WAS TIME-BARRED. POINT II – THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING [R.T.'S] PETITION …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … for their maintenance and repair. Lateral access points are smaller than manhole covers and are only located on private property. There are no lateral access points on 4 A-4324-17T1 public roadways in the Township. …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … On appeal, defendant raises the following contentions: POINT I BOTH THE EVIDENCE AND THE STATEMENTS OBTAINED FROM … THEY ARE THE RESULT OF THE WARRANTLESS ENTRY OF HIS HOME. POINT II [DEFENDANT'S] SENTENCE IS EXCESSIVE, UNDULY …
njcourts.gov
… Bergen County 1 We use fictitious names to protect the confidentiality of the parties. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … minor child." Defendant now appeals, raising the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FINDING THAT DEFENDANT'S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … appeal followed. On appeal petitioner raises the following points for our consideration: POINT ONE THE DISCIPLINARY HEARING OFFICER'S GUILTY …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … this backdrop, defendant raises the following arguments. POINT ONE THE TRIAL COURT'S FAILURE TO ADVISE MR. AMABILE OF … GUILTY PLEA BE VACATED. (Not Raised Below) 8 A-0869-17T4 POINT TWO THE STATE V. SLATER FACTORS WEIGHED IN FAVOR OF …