-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 18, 2023 — Decided December 26, 2023 Before Judges Mawla and Marczyk. On appeal from the Superior … filed a memorandum detailing defendant's background and accomplishments. In addition to attaching thirty character … Defense counsel argued the incident with Argueta was the latest in a series of abuse she suffered at the hands of …
njcourts.gov
… failed to object, Judge Marino should have, sua sponte, revisited her initial decision permitting the hearing to … in her oral and written decisions. We provide the following comments to amplify our decision solely as to defendant's …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 25, 2019 – Decided April 5, 2019 Before Judges Whipple and DeAlmeida. On appeal from Superior … April 2, 2018 judgment of the Law Division dismissing its complaint with prejudice. We affirm. JSM runs a mobile-home … you shall pay 3 A-4079-17T1 for all utilities servicing the Site. Owner is not contractually obligated to pay for any …
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 17, 2019 – Decided October 28, 2019 Before Judges Mayer and Enright. On appeal from the Superior … We affirm, substantially for the reasons set forth in the comprehensive written opinion of Judge Ernest M. Caposela. … good since plaintiffs would be maintaining parking on site and not "overhanging" the sidewalk with their cars. The …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 3, 2021 – Decided July 29, 2021 Before Judges Currier and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the … both orders and remand for entry of an order dismissing the complaint. I. The following facts are derived from the … 1985, the municipal planning board approved the parties' site plan application for a commercial development, subject …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 6, 2021 – Decided December 16, 2021 Before Judges Fasciale and Sumners. On appeal from the … deadline or counsel's inattention or administrative shortcomings do not constitute extraordinary circumstances." … plaintiff failed to explain why she could not inspect the site to determine the pipe's owner. Id. at 152-53. But here, …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 24, 2022 – Decided June 22, 2022 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … because of the unique topography at the Pileggis' site. Next, the Board denied the Pileggis’ application , … Board for a public hearing and a vote in order to ensure a complete record on appeal. At the March 9, 2020 Board …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted June 7, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli and Rothstadt. On appeal from Superior … from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found he committed one count of second-degree NOT FOR PUBLICATION … the construction company. When the officer arrived at the site, he parked his marked vehicle with its lights flashing …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted June 4, 2018 – Decided June 12, 2018 Before Judges Whipple and Rose. On appeal from Superior Court … Long Branch, when he observed a van travelling in the opposite direction "coming head- on at [him]." The two occupants were not …
njcourts.gov
… v. INTERTEK, Respondent. Submitted May 17, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Carroll and Farrington. On appeal from the New … of Labor and Workforce Development, Division of Workers' Compensation, Claim Petition Nos. 2011-32820 and 2013-26473. … 2011. He alleged that he took petroleum samples from a job site, Hess Port Reading Terminal (Hess), to Intertek's …
-
njcourts.gov
… into Judiciary Systems New Jersey Judiciary Online Tools for Judges 2021 1 First Time Signing onto Judiciary Systems … your ID, you must set up your account. This must be completed on a Judiciary PC or Laptop. • After turning on a … installment. P-Synch Procedures 3. Click the P-Synch Web site link to proceed to the website. New Jersey Judiciary …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 24, 2022 – Decided June 22, 2022 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … because of the unique topography at the Pileggis' site. Next, the Board denied the Pileggis’ application , … Board for a public hearing and a vote in order to ensure a complete record on appeal. At the March 9, 2020 Board …
-
9.14
Charges Document PDF
njcourts.gov
… Damage Although there are several ways of determining just compensation, the [insert name of party here] in this case has employed the so-called “before and after” method, in which just compensation is … (Compensation for limitation of access which creates on-site problems may be appropriate if a reasonable buyer or …
-
njcourts.gov
… failed to object, Judge Marino should have, sua sponte, revisited her initial decision permitting the hearing to … in her oral and written decisions. We provide the following comments to amplify our decision solely as to defendant's …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 25, 2019 – Decided April 5, 2019 Before Judges Whipple and DeAlmeida. On appeal from Superior … April 2, 2018 judgment of the Law Division dismissing its complaint with prejudice. We affirm. JSM runs a mobile-home … you shall pay 3 A-4079-17T1 for all utilities servicing the Site. Owner is not contractually obligated to pay for any …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 6, 2021 – Decided December 16, 2021 Before Judges Fasciale and Sumners. On appeal from the … deadline or counsel's inattention or administrative shortcomings do not constitute extraordinary circumstances." … plaintiff failed to explain why she could not inspect the site to determine the pipe's owner. Id. at 152-53. But here, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 3, 2021 – Decided July 29, 2021 Before Judges Currier and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the … both orders and remand for entry of an order dismissing the complaint. I. The following facts are derived from the … 1985, the municipal planning board approved the parties' site plan application for a commercial development, subject …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 17, 2019 – Decided October 28, 2019 Before Judges Mayer and Enright. On appeal from the Superior … We affirm, substantially for the reasons set forth in the comprehensive written opinion of Judge Ernest M. Caposela. … good since plaintiffs would be maintaining parking on site and not "overhanging" the sidewalk with their cars. The …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted June 7, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli and Rothstadt. On appeal from Superior … from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found he committed one count of second-degree NOT FOR PUBLICATION … the construction company. When the officer arrived at the site, he parked his marked vehicle with its lights flashing …
-
njcourts.gov
… v. INTERTEK, Respondent. Submitted May 17, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Carroll and Farrington. On appeal from the New … of Labor and Workforce Development, Division of Workers' Compensation, Claim Petition Nos. 2011-32820 and 2013-26473. … 2011. He alleged that he took petroleum samples from a job site, Hess Port Reading Terminal (Hess), to Intertek's …