-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2045-19 DZEMAL SEFEDINI, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and JO JOS ITALIAN GRILLE, LLC, Respondents. __________________________ Submitted November 15, 2021 – Decided December …
-
njcourts.gov
… element of the crime charged." The court's oral and written decisions did not expressly address the "secured from the …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2010-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CARLOS RAMON GUTIERREZ, a/k/a CARLOS WEZ, WEZ GUTIERREZ, and CURTIS GARY, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________ Submitted …
-
njcourts.gov
… the Spill Act. Id. at 301-03. In particular, we noted prior decisions that recognized the standing of parties "affected … recognized the right of third parties to challenge DEP's decisions, id. at 299-300, if they have "a sufficient … N.J. 163, 171 4 Rosengarten cites to one of our unpublished decisions in support of this proposition. Not only are …
-
njcourts.gov
… the Association contends PERC's decision "throws [previous] decisions and regulations into chaos," citing to statutes, …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5301-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. N.L.S., Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________ IN THE MATTER OF THE …
-
njcourts.gov
… Tasca was decided after the Board rendered its final agency decisions that are in question here, we see no value in … remanding these matters for the Board to reconsider their decisions, as they are consistent with Tasca. 3 The …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2061-16T4 IN THE MATTER OF ROBERTO LOPEZ, JR., CITY OF CAMDEN. _______________________ Argued November 9, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli, Whipple and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the New …
-
njcourts.gov
… Div. 2011). Similarly, we also accord factual findings and decisions of the Tax Court "a highly deferential standard of …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3523-22 JENNIFER FRISCO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. _________________________ Submitted March 17, 2025 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1806-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KEVIN M. COLVELL, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Submitted September 16, 2025 – Decided September 26, 2025 Before Judges Rose …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0665-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LEONARD K. JOHNSON, a/k/a LEONARD K. FLAGG, KEITH L. FLAGG, KEITH JOHNSON, MARCUS W. FLAGG, and LEONARD K. JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. …
-
njcourts.gov
… advised Barr that any further appeal of the agency's final decisions should be filed in the Appellate Division. We are …
-
njcourts.gov
… We use a deferential standard of review for governmental decisions in bidding cases. In re Protest of Award of …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2591-21 GREGORY BAILEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. __________________________ Argued October 17, 2023 – Decided …
-
A-66-24 Respondents Caroline Benson et al., Brief
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… and are thus not severable, and further argued that decisions of the Council are political determinations not … statute for the Council, which requires it to limit its decisions to the mandate at hand. Here, the Council went …
njcourts.gov
… dismissed defendants' counterclaims. The court based its decisions on the arbitrator's award and determined that …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1173-15T3 ANTHONY UDECHUKWU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ESTHER UDECHUKWU, Defendant-Respondent. ____________________________ Submitted January 31, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Ostrer and Vernoia. …
njcourts.gov
… dissatisfied with his lack of a golf cart. Our review of decisions by administrative agencies is limited, with …
njcourts.gov
… language states: Adverse benefit determinations [(ABD)] are decisions Aetna makes that result in denial, reduction, or …