-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0888-18T4 B.D., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. L.N., Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Argued October 16, 2019 – Decided December 5, 2019 Before Judges Yannotti, Hoffman …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1978-23 IN THE MATTER OF PROTEST OF SISBARRO TOWING & RECOVERY, LLC REGARDING DENIAL OF PREQUALIFICATION FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF ROUTINE TOWING SERVICES IN ZONE 10 OF THE GARDEN STATE PARKWAY. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Plaintiff's liability theories included common law fraud, violations of the Consumer Fraud Act (CFA), N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… of the proceeding, Hearing Officer Secare sustained all the violations against Cincotta. Secare determined that …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2747-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JAQUAN A. SUBER, a/k/a AQUIL JAQUAN SUBER, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted March 12, 2025 – Decided June 3, 2025 …
-
njcourts.gov
… to prove his innocence. As a result, we conclude no Miranda violations occurred despite defendant being in custody at …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0752-21 FERNANDO ZAPATA, Plaintiff-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant, v. MONICA ZAPATA, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent. _______________________ Argued December 12, 2022 – Decided April 12, 2023 …
-
njcourts.gov
… UNDER THE NJLAD AND THE NEW JERSEY CIVIL RIGHTS ACT VIOLATIONS. THEREFORE, THE [LANDLORD TENANT] CASE SHOULD BE …
-
njcourts.gov
… her law clerk, and Judge Lynch Ford alleging civil rights violations. On March 4, 2022, Judge Venable issued an order …
njcourts.gov
… in Clarksburg Inn, and maintain there is no way to measure violations objectively, as admitted during the public …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0047-21 POLINA ROITBURG, executor of the estate of DAVID ROITBURG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LEONID ROITBURG, a/k/a LEON ROITBURG, DESIGN OF TOMORROW, INC., a/k/a EDUCATIONAL & LABORATORY SYSTEMS, …
njcourts.gov
… does not define or affect the number of defendant's prior violations of the DWI statute. See State v. Revie, 220 N.J. … does not criminalize or punish a defendant for prior violations of N.J.S.A. 39:4-50 and does not enhance or affect the sentences for those prior violations. State v. Carrigan, 428 N.J. Super. 609, 624 …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2504-18 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. VANCLEVE ASHLEY, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Argued March 1, 2021 – Decided May 7, 2021 Before Judges Fasciale and …
njcourts.gov
… seek summary judgment under Rule 4:23-2 based on perceived violations of discovery orders by Guyden's attorney. On … Guyden's failure to produce documents, and Guyden's violations of discovery orders entered since August 2009. … be disposed of on their merits and dismissal for discovery violations should be "ordered only when no lesser 28 …
njcourts.gov
… negligence and gross negligence. Count three alleged violations of the RBHA and a related regulation, N.J.A.C. … and (l), -3.1. Plaintiffs contend that "[d]efendants' violations of statutory and regulatory duties are evidential … damages."8 They assert that defendants committed two violations of the RBHA and its regulations by not having a …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3675-13T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ADRIAN C. HICKEN, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Submitted September 13, 2016 – …
-
njcourts.gov
… seek summary judgment under Rule 4:23-2 based on perceived violations of discovery orders by Guyden's attorney. On … Guyden's failure to produce documents, and Guyden's violations of discovery orders entered since August 2009. … be disposed of on their merits and dismissal for discovery violations should be "ordered only when no lesser 28 …
-
njcourts.gov
… negligence and gross negligence. Count three alleged violations of the RBHA and a related regulation, N.J.A.C. … and (l), -3.1. Plaintiffs contend that "[d]efendants' violations of statutory and regulatory duties are evidential … damages."8 They assert that defendants committed two violations of the RBHA and its regulations by not having a …
-
njcourts.gov
… does not define or affect the number of defendant's prior violations of the DWI statute. See State v. Revie, 220 N.J. … does not criminalize or punish a defendant for prior violations of N.J.S.A. 39:4-50 and does not enhance or affect the sentences for those prior violations. State v. Carrigan, 428 N.J. Super. 609, 624 …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3675-13T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ADRIAN C. HICKEN, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Submitted September 13, 2016 – …