njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … judge denied. On appeal, plaintiff argues the following: POINT I THE LOWER COURT ERRED WHEN IT FAILED TO FULLY APPLY … PROTECTION OF CONSUMERS OF A VARIETY OF GOODS AND SERVICES. POINT II THE LOWER COURT ERRED WHEN IT FAILED TO ACKNOWLEDGE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … denial of his suppression motion. Specifically, he argues: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION … car and drew their weapons, but kept them at their sides, pointed downward. Upon identifying themselves as police …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … balance, the State moved to dismiss the DWI charge. At that point, defendant withdrew his not guilty plea to the refusal … they are plainly interrelated." The judge went on to point out that the Court found "the statutes not only cross- …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … of foreclosure. On appeal, defendants raise the following points for our review: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY ENTERING SUMMARY JUDGMENT …
njcourts.gov
… pro se. PER CURIAM 1 We use initials in this opinion to be consistent with our prior appellate decision in order to … followed. Defendant raises the following issues on appeal. POINT I. THE REVERSAL OF THE ATTORNEY AND EXPERT FEES WAS … 2 280 N.J. Super. 272 (Ch. Div. 1994). 7 A-4755-17T3 POINT II. THE REVERSAL OF THE ATTORNEY AND EXPERT FEES IS …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … hearing. On appeal, defendant raises the following single point for our consideration: IT WAS AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION … chance of staying in the United States." However, the judge pointed out that during the plea colloquy, "[t]he [c]ourt …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … it be a real line or an imaginary line. That's the focal point for a suspect. The officer did not tell [defendant] to … if he understood the starting instructions to that point. The [o]fficer failed to instruct [defendant] to keep …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … at his second murder trial.1 On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN TREATING . . . DEFENDANT'S … TRIAL AS A SUCCESSIVE PETITION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF. POINT II THE TRIAL COURT FAILED TO CONSIDER THE STATE'S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … raises the following issues for our consideration: POINT ONE THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT AN … OF THE ADVICE PROVIDED TO DEFENDANT REGARDING DEPORTATION. POINT TWO THE PCR COURT ERRED IN FAILING TO FIND EXCUSABLE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … its validity. On appeal, defendant raises the following points: POINT I: THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED ERROR WHEN IT CONCLUDED …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … 15, 2015) (slip op. at 1). On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I THE PCR [JUDGE] ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT AN … [DEFENDANT] REQUESTED THE MOTION BE FILED. (Raised Below). POINT II THE PCR [JUDGE] ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT AN …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … nineteen-year-old female occupants. He forced them at gunpoint to drive to a secluded location where he proceeded to … now raises the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I [DEFENDANT'S] FIRST PCR PETITION SHOULD NOT BE …
njcourts.gov
… Chancery Division, Family Part, Docket No. FO-04- 0223-19. Conrad O'Brien, PC, attorneys for appellant (Christopher A. … her husband, I.G. saw defendant standing across the street, pointing at her house. Defendant fled when he saw I.G., who … 34, 45 (App. Div. 1999). As noted, in defendant's first point, he maintains that the court's factual findings were …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … followed, with defendant raising the following arguments: POINT ONE THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING MR. SINGLETARY'S … IN STIPULATING TO THE TESTIMONY OF STATE'S WITNESS ROMAN. POINT TWO THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING MR. SINGLETARY'S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … WANTED PRESENTED IN HIS FIRST PCR. Defendant specifically pointed to PCR counsel's failure to investigate and subpoena … This appeal followed. Defendant argues: 8 A-0241-20 POINT I DEFENDANT'S SECOND PCR PETITION SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … each complaining about life's difficulties. At some point during this exchange, C.H. texted to C.A., "at least … raising the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I SENTENCING COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO OBJECT TO A MAVERICK …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … 26, 2019). Defendant filed a pro se petition for PCR. His appointed counsel subsequently filed an amended petition, … quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. The judge again pointed out defendant had not shown how "any testimony …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … appeal followed. On appeal, defendant argues the following points: POINT I BECAUSE DEFENDANT RECEIVED [IAC], HE WAS PREJUDICED …
njcourts.gov
… 8, 2018 APPELLATE DIVISION A-2495-16T1 2 prohibits such non-consensual partition. The statute supersedes and nullifies … (emphasis added). However, the Court qualified that point by stating that "the remedy of partition is not … 209 N.J. 558, 572 (2012). There would have been little point for the Legislature to have enacted Section 17.4 if it …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … We affirm. Defendant raises the following issue on appeal: POINT I: THE COURT ERRONEOUSLY DENIED THE PCR WITHOUT … evidentiary hearing. Ibid. State v. Maldon illustrates the point. 422 N.J. Super. 475 (App. Div. 2011). In Maldon, the …