njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … can occur. Critically, however, the experts did not point to a specific design defect in the Cranbury Circle. … of traffic through the Cranbury Circle and the multiple points where 12 A-1293-22 accidents could occur were what …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … to pass through the family room to exit the home. At no point during the evening or night did she see defendant pass … for the decision to not call alibi witnesses. On this point, Judge Kramer found defendant to be more credible than …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the DEP raises the following issues for our consideration: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT’S ORDER SHOULD BE REVERSED BECAUSE … THE SITE’S GROUNDWATER IS AN "ADJACENT WATER." 7 A-1189-22 POINT II THE TRIAL COURT INCORRECTLY INTERPRETED AND APPLIED …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … I just think I can certainly understand [defense counsel's] point. It is different but I certainly understand [defense counsel's] point. [PROSECUTION]: Are you okay with the fact that the …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … trial. 8 A-0113-22 II. Before us, defendant contends: POINT I THE CREDIBLITY DETERMINATIONS AND ERRONEOUS RULINGS … AND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. POINT II THE RECORD BELOW LAC[K]S SUFFICIENT CREDIBLE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … (2003). 11 A-0320-22 II. Defendant now raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I THIS COURT SHOULD GRANT [DEFENDANT] [PCR] BECAUSE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … A-2298-21 On appeal, A.N.H. raises the following arguments: POINT I THE COURT BELOW ERRED BY FINDING THAT N.J.S.A. … SINCE APPELLANT HAS NOT RECENTLY PURCHASED A FIREARM. POINT II THE COURT BELOW ERRED BY APPLYING FACTOR 12, WHICH …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … raised the following contentions for our consideration: POINT I DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL WAS VIOLATED BY … raised the following contentions in his reply brief: POINT I DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL WAS VIOLATED BY …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … II. On appeal, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I THE MOTION COURT'S SUA SPONTE DECISION TO REOPEN THE … ALREADY CONCEDED WAS NOT APPLICABLE – WAS INAPPROPRIATE. POINT II M.G.'S CONSENT TO SEARCH M.M’S BEDROOM WAS INVALID …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … asserts the following arguments for our consideration. POINT I THE LOWER COURT ERRED WHEN IT GRANTED FULL RES … 8 A-1027-22 PERSONAL NOT SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION. POINT II THE LOWER COURT ERRED WHEN IT GRANTED FULL RES …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … facts from the underlying trial. At Kunak's first appointment with plaintiff in July 2009, she told him "she … defendants raise the following issues: 8 A-2405-16T1 POINT I WHERE A DOCTOR TAKES, THROUGH AN ASSIGNMENT OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … On appeal, defendant raises the following contentions: POINT I THE PCR COURT SHOULD HAVE HELD THAT DEFENDANT'S … of Witnesses Who Could Have Provided Exculpatory Evidence. POINT II THE PCR COURT FAILED TO ADDRESS OR ACKNOWLEDGE MANY …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … On appeal, defendant raises the following contentions: POINT-I THE PCR COURT ERRED IN ITS DETERMINATION THAT THE … DID NOT SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF [RULE] 3:22-12(B). POINT-II PCR COURT ERRED WHEN IT SUMMARILY DENIED …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … CJL raises the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I THE DIVISION'S DECISION TO REJECT [APPELLANT'S] BID … AND THEREFORE, THE DIVISION'S REJECTION SHOULD BE REVERSED. POINT II THE DIVISION'S PROCUREMENT METHOD AND AUTOMATIC …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … II. In his present appeal, defendant makes the following points in his brief: POINT I: BECAUSE DEFENDANT ESTABLISHED A PRIMA FACIE CASE OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … 2C:39-7(b)(1), under Indictment 14-12-0794. He argues: POINT I IN TWO SIGNIFICANT RESPECTS, THE JURY INSTRUCTION ON … TO A JURY 3 A-0402-17T4 VERDICT ON ALL ELEMENTS OF A CRIME. POINT II AT THE TRIAL FOR POSSESSION OF A DEFACED GUN, THE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … offers the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I DEFENDANT'S GUILTY PLEA WAS NOT KNOWINGLY AND … V, VI, XIV; N.J. CONST. (1947), ART. I, PARAS. 1, 9 & 10. POINT II DEFENDANT SHOULD BE ORDERED ADMITTED INTO THE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … followed. On appeal, R.G. raises the following arguments: [POINT I:] AS THE TRIAL COURT ERRONEOUSLY RELIED UPON … AND NEGLECT, THE TRIAL COURT'S ORDER MUST BE VACATED. [POINT II:] AS L.G.'S HEARSAY STATEMENT WAS NOT CORROBORATED …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … (PCR) petition without an evidentiary hearing. He argues: POINT I THE POST-CONVICTION RELIEF COURT ERRED IN DENYING … COURT]: If you need to speak to your attorney . . . at any point during this proceeding, let me know and I will give …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … term. This appeal followed. Defendant raises the following points: POINT I THE NO SHOW PROVISION WAS NEVER INCORPORATED INTO …