njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … police officer identifying "the handgun that defendant pointed at his head. . . ." He further explained there was … charges. The motions were denied. Defendant's pro se brief point headings argued: (1) "[p]rosecutorial misconduct …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … raises the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I [DEFENDANT] IS ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON … AND SENTENCING ENHANCEMENT CONSEQUENCES OF HIS CASE. POINT II THE PCR COURT ERRONEOUSLY RULED THAT [DEFENDANT'S] …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … Taylor appealed the final decision, arguing several points, only two of which are cogent enough to be addressed … for threatening a fellow employee. This argument misses the point. Taylor admitted that he threatened the safety of his …
njcourts.gov
… Michael J. Cennimo, attorney for appellant. Yolanda Ciccone, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent … the welfare of a child, N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(a)(1). He argues: POINT I THE [TRIAL] COURT COMMITTED PLAIN ERROR BY DENYING … THE FACTUAL BASIS WAS INADEQUATE AS A MATTER OF LAW. POINT II IF THE SEXUAL CONDUCT ADMITTED TO HERE …
njcourts.gov
… Carrie S. Schultz, Joshua A. Freeman and Andrew J. Economos, on the brief). PER CURIAM NOT FOR PUBLICATION … the following arguments for this court's consideration: POINT I WHETHER THE MOTION JUDGE ERRED WHEN HIS ORDER … PAY ALL COLLEGE EXPENSES AND ALL ATTORNEY[']S FEES[.] POINT II WHETHER THE MOTION JUDGE ERRED BY FAILING TO AWARD …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … of the specific weapon. Defendant raises the following point on this appeal: POINT ONE – BECAUSE THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY DENYING …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the judge summarized what happened next: . . . At this point, [defendant] becomes adamant about leaving[.] . . . He … shocked, there was a[] yelp by [her]. And again, at that point, the [defendant's] car stops, it goes in reverse and …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … of the evidence. In light of our decision on this point, the other appeal issues are moot. A brief discussion … at her 6 A-1368-20 home for a previously scheduled appointment. Id. at 573. The workers, observing that J.C.'s …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … westbound lanes on Route 80 towards an "official use only" point to make an illegal U-turn so he could join eastbound … We affirm. On appeal, defendant raises the following point: THERE ARE MULTIPLE EXAMPLES OF THE TRIAL COURT'S …
njcourts.gov
… v. JUNE PROFITT, ANDREA VENUTO, CARNEYS POINT POLICE DEPARTMENT, and CARNEYS POINT TOWNSHIP, Defendants-Respondents. Submitted February … APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … We affirm. For the first time on appeal, defendant argues: POINT ONE THIS MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF NEW PCR COUNSEL AS SUPPORT WAS NOT PROVIDED FOR …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … award as a judgment pursuant to Rule 4:21A-6(b)(3). At that point, more than thirty days 4 A-4534-19 had passed since … presents the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I THE COURT ERRED IN UPHOLDING THE JUDGMENT AGAINST …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the court committed the following errors: 5 A-3366-20 POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FINDING SERVICE OF THE … DEMONSTRATE A DUE DILIGENT ATTEMPT TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE. POINT II EVEN IF THE APPROPRIATE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY DID …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION February 10, 2020 2 A-2011-18T4 In appealing his convictions for operating a vehicle while under the … TRIAL AND WARRANT REVERSAL. We find insufficient merit in Points II, III, and IV, to warrant further discussion in a … opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). We reject defendant's first point for the following reasons. The main issue concerns …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … On appeal, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT ONE THE POST-CONVICTION RELIEF COURT ERRED IN DENYING … AGGRAVATING AND MITIGATING FACTORS ON APPEAL. 6 A-0729-21 POINT TWO THE COURT MISAPPLIED ITS DISCRETION IN APPLYING R. …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … for [PCR]. II. On appeal, petitioner argues as follows: POINT I [PETITIONER] IS ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING … ABOUT HIS SENTENCE AND FAILING TO COMMUNICATE ADEQUATELY. POINT II THIS MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR FINDINGS OF FACT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … This appeal followed. Plaintiff raises the following points on appeal: I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRONEOUS[LY] HELD THAT … favor of a dismissal of plaintiff's claims. In his second point, plaintiff argues the derivative-immunity defense was …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … On appeal, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I STANDARDS FOR REVIEW OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT. 5 … the order as September 20, 2020 in their brief. 7 A-1272-21 POINT II THE SUPERIOR COURT WAS IN ERROR IN GRANTING …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … On appeal, respondents raise the following arguments: POINT I THE COMPENSATION COURT ERRED IN AWARDING PERMANENT … WITHOUT APPLICATION AND CONSIDERATION OF ANY EVIDENCE. POINT II THE PRIOR WORKER[S'] COMPENSATION AWARDS WERE …
njcourts.gov
… NO. A-1140-21 LUIS RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CONCETTA Y. RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. … set forth in the parties' judgment of divorce. Defendant pointed out that this obligation was temporarily reduced … was employed and was being paid on a weekly basis. At that point, the court should have considered defendant's request …