-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … be seeing "may or may not" be the perpetrators. D'Ambrosio completed a "Show-Up Identification Procedures Worksheet" … further opined that D'Ambrosio's documentation sufficiently complied with the Attorney General Guidelines as well as …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … argument on the petition. In a written opinion that accompanied his order, the judge concluded "[t]he issues of … at 693). To satisfy prong one, [a defendant] ha[s] to "overcome a 'strong presumption' that counsel exercised …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … arbitrator. They interviewed several candidates, and after completing those interviews, the parties selected Mr. … retain him. In February 2009, defendant filed a motion to compel arbitration, appoint a new arbitrator plus an …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … you guys so if you could talk louder. He said you are all coming in very low. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Who is juror … have a due process right to an "impartial and mentally competent" tribunal. Jordan v. Massachusetts, 225 U.S. 167, …
-
njcourts.gov
… WAVES, LP, ET AL., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : ::: SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY ATLANTIC COUNTY – LAW DIVISION … DOCKET NO: ATL-L-2516-19 (CBLP) ORDER THIS MATTER having come before the court on motion by Thomas F. Quinn, Esq. on … of the Order and this Memorandum on e-courts shall serve as service of same on all counsel of record. SARAH BETH …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Judges Gilson and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, … of those three co- defendants would not have changed the outcome of the trial, given the 6 A-1283-23 "overwhelming" …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … his motion to vacate his alimony and child support arrears, compel plaintiff Frances J. Hoffman to provide an updated … in prior orders. In the August 4, 2023 order and accompanying written decision, Judge Adams granted the portion …
-
njcourts.gov
… IN RE STRA TTICE HERNIA MESH LITIGATION ---------------~ SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION - ATLANTIC COUNTY … Street Bel Air, MD 21014 850.805.7011 robert@kbaattorneys.com -and- Jonathan A. Knoll, Esq. COHEN & MALAD, LLP One … counsel not on Plaintiffs' Leadership; e. to coordinate services and filings; f. to maintain and distribute to …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … dismissed. As part of the agreement, the State agreed to recommend a sentence of a flat three years, subject to various … with the plea agreement. Defendant did not appeal. After completing his custodial sentence, defendant was detained by …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … the Law Division's February 10, 2023 order dismissing its complaint against defendants Mark Lake and Vincent Kenney. … had been tenants since 1998. In May 2021, plaintiff filed a complaint alleging defendants breached their lease …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … (PCR) after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm for the comprehensive and cogent reasons expressed by Judge Kevin T. … 566 U.S. 156, 162 (2012). "[A]n attorney's conduct is incompetent when a plea offer is never communicated by the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … also testified he was satisfied with his attorney's services. Notably, two months earlier, petitioner pled … the petition without an evidentiary hearing. In his accompanying fifteen-page opinion, the PCR judge rejected …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … trial court's order dated October 22, 2021, dismissing his complaint with prejudice pursuant to Rule 4:37-2(b). … legal principles, we affirm. I. Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking damages for personal injuries allegedly …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … eighty-five percent of his eleven-year prison term before becoming eligible for parole. His parole release date is March … for our consideration: THE INSTITUTIONAL CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE IMPROPERLY DETERMINED THAT 3 A-3488-20 THE …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … to ensure the excavation and installation was complete, a Jersey City Street Inspector was responsible for … permitted area to determine whether the job was properly completed. After reviewing the photographs, Lim testified if …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … negligence of defendant Max Marcano and plaintiff was not comparatively negligent. The jury awarded plaintiff $140,000 … a proposed final order of judgment and affidavit of services for counsel fees. Defendants moved for a new trial …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … ordered to keep his arms in the air. As the officer was completing the pat-down, he felt a rectangular object in the … from a traffic violation." Id. at 618; see also State v. Bacome, 228 N.J. 94, 96-97 (2017) ("We underscore that the …
-
njcourts.gov
… PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … N.J.S.A. 2C:20-11(c)(2), should not be interpreted to encompass sales tax. Based on our review of the record and the … GRADATION STATUTE, N.J.S.A. 2C:20-11(c), DOES NOT ENCOMPASS SALES TAX. THE TRIAL COURT MUST THEREFORE AMEND THE …
-
njcourts.gov
… & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., and McKesson Corp SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION – MIDDLESEX COUNTY … have moved before this Court to Reinstate Plaintiff’s Complaint, which is currently dismissed without prejudice … that the Motion to Reinstate is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby REINSTATED; and it is further ORDERED …
-
njcourts.gov
… & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., and McKesson Corp SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION – MIDDLESEX COUNTY … have moved before this Court to Reinstate Plaintiff’s Complaint, which is currently dismissed without prejudice … that the Motion to Reinstate is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby REINSTATED; and it is further ORDERED …