njcourts.gov
… from a March 2, 2017 order denying his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR) NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE … makes four arguments, which he articulates as follows: POINT I – THE DEFENDANT DID NOT WAIVE HIS RIGHTS KNOWINGLY; THEREFORE, THE GUILTY PLEA MUST BE VACATED POINT II – THE DEFENDANT WAS DENIED THE RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … physically assaulted her on July 19, 2012. At that point, J.M. was fourteen years old. J.M. testified that the … and defendant. On appeal, defendant raises the following points: 6 A-2938-15T2 POINT I THE DEFENDANT WAS DEPRIVED HIS …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … In her self-authored merits brief, appellant argues: POINT I THIS COURT SHOULD REMAND THIS MATTER FOR … AND ON IMMINENT DISCHARGE IN COTTMAN V. BOARD OF REVIEW POINT II THIS MATTER SHOULD BE REVERSED SINCE THE AGENCY DID …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … app led him to an apartment complex. When I.K. could not pinpoint the location of his missing phone in the complex, he … the police, using one of the other phones, were able to pinpoint I.K.'s missing phone in an area near building C. In …
njcourts.gov
… and ATLANTIC PAVING (& COATING), LLC; JOE ROSARIO & ROSARIO CONTRACTING CORP., d/b/a ROSARIO MAZZA DEMOLITION AND … appeal followed. Plaintiff raises the following arguments: Point I The trial court erred in precluding plaintiff from … warrants reversal and remand for a new trial. 6 A-4973-14T4 Point II The trial court erred in granting summary judgment …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … the following issues for our consideration in his appeal. POINT I DEFENDANT WAS DENIED THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF … wiretaps used to convict the defendant. 6 A-3999-15T3 POINT II DEFENDANT IS ENTITLED TO WITHDRAW HIS PLEA BECAUSE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … factors. On appeal, defendant raises the following points: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY FAILING TO INSTURCT THE …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 17, 2016 – Decided Before Judges O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from Superior Court of New … presents the following issues for our consideration: POINT I – THE DEFENDANT WAS DENIED THE RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE … AND ART. 1, PAR. 10 OF THE NEW JERSEY CONSTITUTION. POINT II – THE PLEA SHOULD BE VACATED BECAUSE THE FACTUAL …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … opportunity to participate. I. Sutton raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE HEARING OFFICER'S (DHO) GUILTY FINDINGS OF THE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … supplemental brief did not set forth any specific point headings or whether his arguments were raised before … appeal followed. On appeal defendant contends the following points: POINT I DEFENDANT'S PETITION FOR [PCR] SHOULD NOT BE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … (FET). This appeal followed. Bussinger raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE TERM "SERIOUS", AS USED IN N.J.S.A. 30:4- 123.60 …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … therefore affirm. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for this court's consideration: POINT I THE PROSECUTOR'S OBJECTION TO [DEFENDANT'S] PTI …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … brief, defendant forwards the following additional claims: POINT I THE PCR COURT ERRED BY FAILING TO ADDRESS THE … WITNESS INCONSIST[E]NT STATEMENTS SUPPORTED ON THE RECORD. POINT II THE PCR COURT ERRED BY NOT ADDRESSING DEFENDANT'S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … defendant raises the following arguments in this appeal. POINT I PETITIONER IS ENTITLED TO POST- CONVICTION RELIEF … DISPROPORTIONATE ILLEGAL SENTENCE HE RECEIVED IN HIS CASE. POINT IA Appellant's Sentence was Excessive. POINT IB …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … makes two arguments, which he articulates as follows: POINT I – DEFENDANT'S PCR PETITION SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN TIME BARRED. POINT II – THIS MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR AN EVIDENTIARY …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … now raises the following arguments for our consideration: POINT 1 IT IS A VIOLATION OF STANDARDS AND DISREGARD FOR … SHOULD BE REVERSED AND VACATED FOR SAID STATED REASONS. POINT 2 SAFETY WAS ABORTED, WHEN STAFF REMOVED [BROWN] FROM …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … an evidentiary hearing, raising the following issues: POINT ONE DEFENSE COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO ADEQUATELY … TO EFFECTUATE A NEW TRIAL STRATEGY DURING THE TRIAL. POINT TWO APPELLATE COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO RAISE ON DIRECT …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … 3 A-0806-19 On appeal defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I. BECAUSE DEFENDANT WAS A JUVENILE AT THE TIME OF THE …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … followed. Defendant raises the following issues on appeal: POINT I: THE PCR COURT SHOULD HAVE HELD THAT DEFENDANT'S … Address the Claims Raised by the Affidavit of Jose Lopez. POINT II: THE PCR COURT ERRED IN REJECTING DEFENDANT'S CLAIM …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … final agency decision. He raises the following arguments: POINT I. The Final Administrative Decision is a standard … unrealistic, and is utterly irrelevant to this matter. POINT II. The defendants in this matter failed to conduct a …