njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … now appeals raising the following arguments: 6 A-1716-14T1 POINT ONE THE ORDER DENYING POST-CONVICTION RELIEF SHOULD BE … ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE. POINT TWO DEFENDANT MADE A PRIMA FACIE SHOWING OF …
njcourts.gov
… the brief). PER CURIAM Defendant, Mark Tilson, appeals his conviction of disorderly persons simple assault and his … On appeal, defendant makes the following arguments: POINT I THE DELAY OF MORE THAN FIFTEEN MONTHS IN THE … DEFENDANT OF HIS FEDERAL AND STATE SPEEDY TRIAL RIGHTS. POINT II DEFENDANT TILSON WAS DEPRIVED OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … motion to represent himself at trial on these counts, and appointed standby counsel to advise defendant on legal issues. … brief in support of the petition. Defendant raised six points: (1) that he was denied effective assistance of trial …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … On appeal, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I THE COURT ERRED BY DENYING [DEFENDANT'S] MOTIONS TO … of a drug transaction having just occurred. At that point, an investigative detention is authorized. There is …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … hearing. Defendant now appeals, arguing: 3 A-0957-15T3 POINT I THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN DENYING MR. SESSOMS' … RELIEF WITHOUT AFFORDING HIM AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING. POINT II THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING MR. SESSOMS'S CLAIM …
njcourts.gov
… STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TIMOTHY M. CONNELL, Defendant-Appellant. … On appeal, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I – DEFENDANT RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL. POINT II – DEFENDANT'S PETITION FOR POST- CONVICTION RELIEF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … his convictions and sentence raising the following single point for our consideration: DEFENDANT DID NOT ENTER THE … do it . . . . There's nothing else for us to talk about, point blank, period." As defendant continued to utter a …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … drugs and began walking back to their car. Ibid. At that point, defendant and two of his companions stopped the … [also] note[d] that defendant may, 5 A-4073-15T4 at some point when the combined terms[2] of parole ineligibility are …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … been different. On appeal, defendant presents the following point headings for our consideration: POINT I THE COURT COMMITTED HARMFUL ERROR IN RULING THAT THE …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … and a friend were sitting. D.S. knocked on the window and pointed a gun at L.O. and the friend. D.S. instructed L.O. … raises the following contentions for our consideration: POINT I THE LAW DIVISION ERRED AS A MATTER OF LAW IN …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … a certification, all of which were incorporated into his appointed PCR counsel's brief. Defendant claimed trial counsel … This appeal followed. Defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT ONE THE DEFENDANT'S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … ensuing order. Plaintiff presents the following argument points for our consideration: POINT I MOTION JUDGE COMMITTED PLAIN ERROR BY AFFIRMING …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … walked straight to his room without saying a word. At this point, plaintiff testified defendant "started a verbal … had been drinking before she arrived. 5 A-1943-17T2 At this point, plaintiff testified defendant became verbally …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … On appeal, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I 5 A-0647-18T4 DEFENDANT IS ENTITLED TO RELAXATION OF THE PROCEDURAL TIME BAR. POINT II AS DEFENDANT RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … iteration of the applicable rules, the Law Division is powerless to review a fee arbitration award). Pursuant to … Auth. v. Artaki, LLC, 392 N.J. Super. 141, 149 (App. Div. 2007))). Based on defendant's testimony at the March 7 and …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … an effective retirement date of December 1, 2021. His second ADRB application alleged: "As a result of this … Police & Firemen's Retirement System, 192 N.J. 189, 212 (2007). He concluded appellant's application for ADRB should …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … October 28, 2024 decision denying her motion for reconsideration. Applying the deferential standard of review … N.J. 465, 475 (2019); In re Herrmann, 192 N.J. 19, 27-28 (2007); see also Melnyk v. Bd. of Educ. of the Delsea Reg'l …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … opposed the motion, contending defendant was not a court-appointed expert but instead a joint expert retained by the … v. AHL Servs., Inc., 396 N.J. Super. 486, 494 (App. Div. 2007)). On de novo review, "[a] trial court's interpretation …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … following a multi-day evidentiary hearing on five non-consecutive days between December 13, 2019 2 Plaintiff's … Hand v. Hand, 391 N.J. Super. 102, 105 (App. Div. 2007). The focus is on the "safety, happiness, physical, …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … 42 U.S.C. § 1437f. In October 2022, plaintiff's third-party contractor, Monitor Data Corporation ("Monitor") installed a … at 202 (quoting Hodges v. Sasil Corp., 189 N.J. 210, 221 (2007)). Under our State's Anti-Eviction Act, "[a] judgment …