-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … trial court's order dated October 22, 2021, dismissing his complaint with prejudice pursuant to Rule 4:37-2(b). … legal principles, we affirm. I. Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking damages for personal injuries allegedly …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … eighty-five percent of his eleven-year prison term before becoming eligible for parole. His parole release date is March … for our consideration: THE INSTITUTIONAL CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE IMPROPERLY DETERMINED THAT 3 A-3488-20 THE …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … to ensure the excavation and installation was complete, a Jersey City Street Inspector was responsible for … permitted area to determine whether the job was properly completed. After reviewing the photographs, Lim testified if …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … negligence of defendant Max Marcano and plaintiff was not comparatively negligent. The jury awarded plaintiff $140,000 … exhaustion of plaintiff’s medical benefits; the improper comments made by plaintiff’s counsel during his opening …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … ordered to keep his arms in the air. As the officer was completing the pat-down, he felt a rectangular object in the … from a traffic violation." Id. at 618; see also State v. Bacome, 228 N.J. 94, 96-97 (2017) ("We underscore that the …
-
njcourts.gov
… PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … N.J.S.A. 2C:20-11(c)(2), should not be interpreted to encompass sales tax. Based on our review of the record and the … GRADATION STATUTE, N.J.S.A. 2C:20-11(c), DOES NOT ENCOMPASS SALES TAX. THE TRIAL COURT MUST THEREFORE AMEND THE …
-
njcourts.gov
… & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., and McKesson Corp SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION – MIDDLESEX COUNTY … have moved before this Court to Reinstate Plaintiff’s Complaint, which is currently dismissed without prejudice … that the Motion to Reinstate is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby REINSTATED; and it is further ORDERED …
-
njcourts.gov
… & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., and McKesson Corp SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION – MIDDLESEX COUNTY … have moved before this Court to Reinstate Plaintiff’s Complaint, which is currently dismissed without prejudice … that the Motion to Reinstate is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby REINSTATED; and it is further ORDERED …
-
njcourts.gov
… & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., and McKesson Corp SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION – MIDDLESEX COUNTY … have moved before this Court to Reinstate Plaintiff’s Complaint, which is currently dismissed without prejudice … is further ORDERED that Defendant may move to dismiss the Complaint with prejudice as of June 23, 2021; and it is …
-
njcourts.gov
… & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., and McKesson Corp SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION – MIDDLESEX COUNTY … have moved before this Court to Reinstate Plaintiff’s Complaint, which is currently dismissed without prejudice … that the Motion to Reinstate is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby REINSTATED; and it is further ORDERED …
-
njcourts.gov
… & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., and McKesson Corp SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION – MIDDLESEX COUNTY … have moved before this Court to Reinstate Plaintiff’s Complaint, which is currently dismissed without prejudice … matthew.wells New Stamp Statement of Reasons This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Reinstate …
-
njcourts.gov
… & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., and McKesson Corp SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION – MIDDLESEX COUNTY … have moved before this Court to Reinstate Plaintiff’s Complaint, which is currently dismissed without prejudice … matthew.wells New Stamp Statement of Reasons This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Reinstate …
-
#16-06
Administrative Directives
njcourts.gov
… DIRECTOR OF THE COURTS RICHARD J. HUGHES JUSTICE COMPLEX P.O. BOX 037 TRENTON, NEW JERSEY 08625-0037 [Questions or comments may be directed to 609-633-2390 or 609-984-4853.] … Appellate Division’s decision in Pryce v. Scharff, 384 N.J.Super. 197 (App. Div. 2006), and the subsequent denial of a …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Berdote Byrne. On appeal from the New Jersey Civil Service Commission, Docket No. 2021-655. The Sampat Law Firm, LLC, … General, attorney for respondent New Jeresey Civil Service Commission (Pamela N. Ullman, Deputy Attorney General, on …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … PCR counsel. According to defendant, PCR counsel failed to comply with Rule 3:22-6(d) by advancing PCR arguments … your petition, the services of the Appellate Section have come to an end. On January 27, 2021, defendant sent a letter …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … N.J.S.A. 2C:15-1(a)(1), arguing the jury charge failed to comply with our Supreme Court's decision in State v. Lopez, … of October 2018, . . . defendant . . . , in the course of committing a theft, did knowingly inflict bodily injury upon …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Mayer, Enright and Paganelli. On appeal from the New Jersey Commissioner of Education, Docket No. 149-5/16. Y.Y., … Attorney General, attorney for respondent New Jersey Commissioner of Education (Sadia Ahsanuddin, Deputy Attorney …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … DAVID GOYCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. ____________________________ … (PIP) benefits by defendant, Progressive Insurance Company. We affirm, substantially for the reasons set forth …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … for unlawful purpose, and terroristic threats . Camilo committed these offenses in 1980. Initially, the judge … are subject to the 1979 Parole Act based on the date they committed their crimes. Id. at 497 ("To the extent that …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Judges Whipple, Mayer and Paganelli. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County, … has "a due process right to an 'impartial and mentally competent' tribunal." State v. Mohammed, 226 N.J. 71, 83 …