njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … raises the following contentions for our consideration: POINT I THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED BELOW WAS NOT SUFFICIENT TO … A REASONABLE DOUBT THAT DEFENDANT OPERATED THE VEHICLE. POINT II THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED BELOW DID NOT ESTABLISH THAT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … third petition2 for post-conviction relief (PCR), claiming: POINT I THE PCR COURT'S ORDER SHOULD BE REVERSED AND THE … pertains to a second or subsequent petition. 3 A-1364-16T2 POINT II THE COURT MISAPPLIED ITS DISCRETION IN APPLYING R. …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … of his petition. On appeal, defendant raises the following point for our review: POINT I: THE POST-CONVICTION RELIEF COURT ERRED IN DENYING …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … wife to search the 4Runner. Defendant argues on appeal: POINT I: THE UNREASONABLE EXECUTION OF THE SEARCH WARRANT … APARTMENT. U.S. CONST. AMEND. IV; N.J. CONST. ART. I, ¶7. POINT II: THE DRUGS FOUND IN THE VEHICLE PURSUANT TO THE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … Defendant raises the following search issue on appeal: POINT I: THE WARRANTLESS ENTRY AND SEARCH WERE NOT … issue in connection with the violation of probation: POINT II: THE COURT FAILED TO [ELICIT] AN ADEQUATE FACTUAL …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … We affirm. For the first time on appeal, defendant argues: POINT I DEFENDANT'S [PCR] COUNSEL RENDERED INEFFECTIVE … claim raised by defendant, no argument need be made on that point. Stated differently, the brief must advance the …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … Defendant appeals, raising the following arguments: POINT ONE THE CONVICTION MUST BE REVERSED BECAUSE THE COURT … REQUIRED REASONABLE DOUBT STANDARD. (Not Raised Below) POINT TWO CUMULATIVE AND PREJUDICIAL FRESH COMPLAINT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … further apprehension over defendant's claim, the judge pointed out that the PCR petition included defendant's … 198 N.J. at 158, to support his request. The judge also pointed out that Johnson was charged as a co-defendant and …
njcourts.gov
… and B&M ESTATES LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, BRENDAN CONHEENEY, and MICHAEL CHERVENAK, Defendants-Respondents. … could be found or reasonably inferred.[2] In a single point brief, Kislak appeals arguing: 2 While we appreciate … Myra Properties and is not a party to the appeal – in its point heading, Kislak's brief focuses entirely on why B&M …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … amount of $21,028.41. She now appeals raising the following point for our consideration: THE MATTER SHOULD BE REMANDED … of restitution ordered and the terms of payment. To that point, although defendant acknowledged in her sentencing 7 …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … presents the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I FAILURE TO CALCULATE THE RE-SENTENCING TO DETERMINE … constituted the DOC's final agency decision. 7 A-1807-17T3 POINT II PRIOR SERVICE CREDIT AND JAIL CREDIT AFTER …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … written assurance with regard to a potential charge at some point in the future. Any such potential fee will undoubtedly … Judgments Act (the Act), N.J.S.A. 2A:16-50 to -62, empowers courts to declare rights, status and other legal …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … is necessary to prevent future violations. Plaintiff also points out that despite efforts to remove the revenge porn, … in the internet's public domain. Plaintiff correctly points out that the judge did not issue his factual findings …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … now raises the following arguments in this appeal. POINT I AS DEFENDANT RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF … assistance of counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. POINT II AS THERE ARE GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACTS IN …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … certain financial obligations. Defendant argues a single point on this appeal: POINT I THE ADMISSION OF DEFENDANT'S DELUSIONAL STATEMENTS …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … by an oncoming car, she elected to enter the roadway at a point not designated for crossing. The area where decedent … view of the road for both pedestrians and drivers. At the point of impact, the sidewalk on the eastern side of …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … appeal followed with defendant presenting the following point of argument: POINT I THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING THE PCR PETITION …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … judge. On appeal, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY DENYING THE SEVERANCE … THEREBY VIOLATING HIS CONFRONTATION CLAUSE RIGHTS. POINT II THE SENTENCING COURT ERRED BY FAILING TO CONSIDER …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … one. On appeal, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRONEOUSLY DETERMINED THAT … court gave excessive weight to aggravating factor [one]. POINT II. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN ITS APPLICATION OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … his PCR petition in May 2018. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I THE TIME BAR OF R[ULE] 3:22-12 SHOULD NOT BE APPLIED … 4) THE [FORTY-DAY] DEADLINE WAS ONLY MISSED BY ONE MONTH[.] POINT II DEFENDANT'S SENTENCE WAS ILLEGAL BECAUSE IT FAILED …