njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 8, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino, Haas and Geiger. On appeal from … N.J. 420, 448 (2012). We generally give deference to the factual findings of the family court because it has the … Memorandum of Decision in which he meticulously and comprehensively reviewed the testimony and documentary …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 1, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli and Carroll. On appeal from the … the following reasons, we affirm. We derive the following facts from evidence submitted by the parties in support of, … Mortgage Network, Inc. (Intercounty), and was assisted in completing an application to refinance her mortgage. On …
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 30, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Leone and Mawla. On appeal from the New Jersey … of Labor and Workforce Development, Division of Workers' Compensation, Claim Petition No. 2012-7875. Randolph Brause … and temporary disability benefits. We affirm. The following facts are taken from the record. In 2009, Staikos injured …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 11, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Messano and Accurso. On appeal from Superior … limited discovery in the case, was fully familiar with the facts and was adequately prepared for trial. The judge found … that the denial of a reasonable adjournment request compelled reversal. On this point, defendant urges us to …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 13, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Gilson. On appeal from Superior … an alibi witness who claimed he and defendant were together on a porch during the robbery. The PCR judge found … at the time of this incident unless there was some communication with defense counsel." Accordingly, the PCR 9 …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 6, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Koblitz and Manahan. On appeal from Superior … Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. did not have standing to file the complaint and that NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL … answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no …
default
… and LEO H. WAGNER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOB MARTIN, COMMISSIONER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL … Submitted September 12, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Gooden Brown. On appeal from … referred to interchangeably in our prior opinion – worked together to develop the property; the two entities shared the …
default
… Argued May 23, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Koblitz and Suter. On appeal from Superior Court … Plaintiffs filed an order to show cause and verified complaint to compel arbitration of this dispute. The trial … in good faith or without a reasonable basis in law and fact." Plaintiffs asked the arbitrator to modify the award …
default
… Argued May 1, 2018 – Decided September 5, 2018 Before Judges Mawla and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the New Jersey Civil Service Commission, Docket No. 2015-2332. Adam S. Abramson-Schneider … and costs against the Township. We affirm. I. The following facts are taken from the record. In 2014, Hance had been a …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 27, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Nugent and Currier. On appeal from Superior … March 16, 2017 2 A-1330-15T2 We derive the following facts from the sparse appellate record. Plaintiff and … and separated in 2010. In 2014, plaintiff filed a divorce complaint. Defendant failed to answer the complaint. …
default
… Submitted May 14, 2018 – Decided May 13, 2019 Before Judges Ostrer and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … her daughter. We assume the reader's familiarity with the facts and legal discussion in our prior opinion. State v. … discretion or error of law in the trial court's cogent and comprehensive opinion. The trial judge reconsidered the four …
default
… Argued May 19, 2022 – Decided June 15, 2022 Before Judges Haas and Alvarez. On appeal from the New Jersey … because it drew different conclusions from the ALJ's factual findings. For example, the Division identified M.Q.L.'s failure to provide income tax returns declaring the rental income, or documents …
default
… GUITERREZ-GANAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. ____________________________ … Submitted October 6, 2021 – Decided April 1, 2022 Before Judges Fuentes, Gilson, and Gooden Brown. On appeal … expense benefits. Accordingly, we affirm. I. The material facts are not in dispute. On April 29, 2016, plaintiff's car …
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 4, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Mawla and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … a non- jury trial. Defendants contend that the court's factual findings were improper as not supported by the competent and credible evidence. We affirm. We are able to …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 28, 2020 - Decided Before Judges Geiger and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … the applicable law, we affirm. We discern the following facts from the record. Since 2010, defendant has rented a … is over." On April 27, 2019, plaintiff filed a new verified complaint in Middlesex County seeking unpaid rent, in the …
njcourts.gov
… DIGIOIA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION, Respondent-Respondent. … Submitted March 16, 2021 – Decided March 30, 2021 Before Judges Haas and Natali. On appeal from the New Jersey … appellant's request for a hearing as there were no disputed facts regarding his New York conviction. Instead, the Chief …
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 13, 2021 – Decided March 25, 2021 Before Judges Whipple, Rose, and Firko. On appeal from the … Ortiz-Ponce and Randy's were insured by a Progressive Commercial $100,000 Combined Single Limit (CSL), or … answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 28, 2020 – Decided June 12, 2020 Before Judges Fuentes, Haas and Enright. On appeal from the New Jersey Civil Service Commission, Docket No. 2015-2646. Alterman & Associates LLC, … control over and interact with them will not make them targets of inappropriate, derogatory, and racist chats. To …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 7, 2020 – Decided May 27, 2020 Before Judges Alvarez and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the … final restraining order (FRO). We affirm. I. The following facts are derived from the record. In 2011, K.M., … obtained an FRO prohibiting him from having any contact or communication with her. In June 2017, the court amended the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 24, 2021 – Decided May 21, 2021 Before Judges Sumners and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … the litigation privilege and affirm. We glean the relevant facts from the allegations in plaintiff's complaint, treating them as true and extending to him all …