-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 13, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Gilson. On appeal from Superior … an alibi witness who claimed he and defendant were together on a porch during the robbery. The PCR judge found … at the time of this incident unless there was some communication with defense counsel." Accordingly, the PCR 9 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 27, 2018 – Decided Before Judges O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … and Port Authority of New York and New Jersey from the complaint with prejudice. The court granted summary judgment … answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if any, show that there is no …
-
njcourts.gov
… Judge Mount Holly, NJ 08060 (609) 288-9500 Ext 38303 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE TAX COURT COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS February 28, 2018 Bruce J. Stavitsky, … more fully below, the motion is GRANTED. I. Finding of Facts and Procedural History The court makes the following …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 25, 2022 – Decided December 5, 2022 Before Judges Messano and Gummer. On appeal from the Superior … defendant Hector S. Alvarez of second-degree conspiracy to commit robbery and fourth-degree attempted theft as a … appeal concluded the judge had erred in finding aggravating factor two – the age or vulnerability of the victim – see …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 6, 2022 – Decided October 13, 2022 Before Judges Haas and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the New … The Board conducted a multi-day hearing, and issued a comprehensive thirty-two page written decision. The history of this litigation and the facts relevant to this appeal are set forth at length in …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 10, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Accurso and Gilson. On appeal from the Superior … That initial order was entered on March 20, 2015, together with a written opinion. Defendant appealed and we … does not require a showing of serious bodily injury, as compared to proof of bodily injury; (2) the amount of drugs, …
-
njcourts.gov
… telephonically February 6, 2019 – Decided August 8, 2019 Before Judges Sabatino and Sumners. On appeal from the Board … from work to receive medical treatment until August. Still complaining of back pain a year later, Straub followed his … was transmitted to the Office of Administrative Law for a fact-finding hearing. Straub testified at the hearing and …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 28, 2020 - Decided Before Judges Geiger and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … the applicable law, we affirm. We discern the following facts from the record. Since 2010, defendant has rented a … is over." On April 27, 2019, plaintiff filed a new verified complaint in Middlesex County seeking unpaid rent, in the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 4, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Mawla and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … a non- jury trial. Defendants contend that the court's factual findings were improper as not supported by the competent and credible evidence. We affirm. We are able to …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 7, 2020 – Decided May 27, 2020 Before Judges Alvarez and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the … final restraining order (FRO). We affirm. I. The following facts are derived from the record. In 2011, K.M., … obtained an FRO prohibiting him from having any contact or communication with her. In June 2017, the court amended the …
-
njcourts.gov
… telephonically April 2, 2020 – Decided May 20, 2020 Before Judges Alvarez and Suter. On appeal from the Superior … entered on February 27, 2019, with supporting findings of fact, credibility determinations and conclusions of law … the parties to "seek the reunification therapist's recommendations regarding [d]efendant's access to, contact …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 14, 2018 – Decided May 13, 2019 Before Judges Ostrer and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … her daughter. We assume the reader's familiarity with the facts and legal discussion in our prior opinion. State v. … discretion or error of law in the trial court's cogent and comprehensive opinion. The trial judge reconsidered the four …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 26, 2018 – Decided June 19, 2019 Before Judges Fuentes, Accurso and Moynihan. On appeal from the New Jersey Civil Service Commission, Docket No. 2015-401. Joseph William Tartaglia … We reject this argument and affirm. We gather the following facts from the record developed before the ALJ. 3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 23, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Koblitz and Gooden Brown. On appeal from the … 06-05-0485. Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Steven M. Gilson, Designated Counsel, on the … the court determines "there are material issues of disputed fact that cannot be resolved by reference to the existing …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 10, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Firko. On appeal from the Superior … failing to pay court- imposed financial obligations; and 6) committing a new offense, obstructing the administration of … defendant, the 26.5 grams of cocaine seized from him was in fact not cocaine and was not tested by the lab. He claimed …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 19, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Suter and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the Superior … pro se. Esther Suarez, Hudson County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Stephanie Davis Elson, Assistant Prosecutor, … 129 N.J. at 459. "To sustain that burden, specific facts" that "provide the court with an adequate basis on …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 3, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Rose. On appeal from the Superior … plaintiff's application without prejudice pending the outcome of litigation filed by the Division of Child Protection … judge erroneously rejected plaintiff's application on that factor and there exist disputed factual issues concerning …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 14, 2020 – Decided June 17, 2020 Before Judges Alvarez and Suter. On appeal from the Superior … without obtaining a permit and for failing to perform community service in lieu of fines. He was ordered to … the Law Division may make independent findings of fact and conclusions of law de novo, based on the record …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY ATLANTIC … Decided: March 28, 2019 John L. Zaorski, attorney for plaintiff (Cappuccio & Zaorski). Raymond F. Danielewicz, … experts are expected to testify. State the substance of the facts and opinions to which your experts are expected to …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 15, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and O'Connor. On appeal from the Civil Service Commission, Docket No. 2014-52. Mark W. Catanzaro argued the … based upon Kenney's failure to report to his employer the fact the New Jersey State Police (NJSP) conducted a search …