-
njcourts.gov
… PRODUCT LITIGATJON SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: ATLANTIC COUNTY ATLNLN2648N 15 CASE NO,: 300 CIVIL …
njcourts.gov
… and Factual Findings The City of Newark/City of Newark-Division of Sewer and Water (“Newark”) is the owner of one … the same.” In response, Newark’s counsel stated that “we have been working under the assumption that the restrictions … Therefore, in my opinion, the subject property does not have a market value.” However, because he was asked to …
-
A-0274-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… COURT OF NEW JERSEY STATE OF NEW JERSEY, : APPELLATE DIVISION : : Docket No. A-000274-23 Team 02 Plaintiff, : : On … observations.” 5T43-5/44-5. Defense counsel proffered to have Baverov “testify not substantively [to] pursue a line … a few beers, one beer, no beer. It’s an abnormality that I have no control over.” 5T49-10/14. Rather than develop or …
-
A-20-24 Appellate Division Brief
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Superior Court of New Jersey APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3359-21T4 _____________________________ … case. Defendant’s suggestion that the court should instead have applied “ordinary abuse of discretion” review is in … that, based on that mutual familiarity, they “would have the confidence to kind of stay there with [her].” …
-
A-0509-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… and LANCE SCHONER SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION Docket A-509-23 CIVIL ACTION On appeal from the … a $13,500.00 project and been paid $6,800.00, he’d have been owed $6,700.00, not $7,800.00 as he testified. 106 … there been competing testimony, the trial court judge would have been obligated to make findings of fact and set forth …
-
015734-2014, 006894-2015, 005070-2016, 007402-2018, 005841-2018, 006935-2019, 008282-2019, 008756-2020, 011966-2020, 003283-2021, and 003338-2021
Opinion
njcourts.gov
… and Factual Findings The City of Newark/City of Newark-Division of Sewer and Water (“Newark”) is the owner of one … the same.” In response, Newark’s counsel stated that “we have been working under the assumption that the restrictions … Therefore, in my opinion, the subject property does not have a market value.” However, because he was asked to …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1638-23 G.S., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … The parties lived together, co-owned their dwelling, and have a child in common. Defendant moved out of the residence … 4 A-1638-23 which she took items and may very well have exchanged words with [plaintiff]. The trial court …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3468-23 CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE … trial or initiate or participate in a class action if you have a dispute with us. Instead, this provision tells you … will not make a better contract for parties than they have voluntarily made for themselves, nor alter their …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2699-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … under State v. Yarbrough, 100 N.J. 627 (1985). Because we have previously held defendant's sentence is valid, and the … principles amplified by the Torres Court. Because we have previously determined defendant's sentence is valid, …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3326-23 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, … Motel Corp., 296 N.J. Super. 402, 411 (App. Div. 1997)). To have standing in a foreclosure action, "'a party seeking to … Super. 323, 327-28 (Ch. Div. 2010)). If a party does not have ownership or control of the underlying debt, the …
njcourts.gov
… ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION MONMOUTH COUNTY DOCKET NO. MON-C-41-22 TIMOTHY J. … or the Brill standard, plaintiffs would be entitled to have the court either assume what they allege or rely on is … law.” Id., Exhibit B (emphasis added). Plaintiffs don’t have to prove their claims at this stage. See Sickles v. …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1853-23 ANN MINZNER-CONLEY, … third party would supervise the process. Defendant would have an opportunity to see what plaintiff intended to take … to tell you that I'm glad, because I think you . . . should have a look of concern. I probably have a look of concern on …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0638-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … to resentencing and 5 A-0638-21 relies on cases that have prescribed rules for sentencing juveniles. In that … held that under New Jersey's Constitution, juveniles who have previously been sentenced to a mandatory prison term of …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1997-22 U'BAY LUMUMBA, Appellant, v. NEW … Board likewise rejected Lumumba's argument that it should have considered the COVID-19 crisis and his positive COVID … granting parole. Lumumba also argued that the Board should have rescinded its decision denying parole because it relied …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2615-22 JAMI ROBLEJO, … Plaintiff and defendant married on April 29, 2016, and have one child, a son, born in September 2017. The parties … marriage, ages nineteen and twenty. These adult children have significant needs and were diagnosed with autism …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1373-22 ARTHERINE PRICE, … if, "but for the event, the [injury] probably would not have happened." Ibid. Proximate cause is "any cause which in … complained of and without which the [injury] would not have occurred." Conklin v. Hannoch Weisman, 145 N.J. 395, …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2731-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BERNARDO CHAVEZ- PADILLA, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ … other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. 2 A-2731-21 Defendant Chavez-Padilla appeals from an April 6, 2022 order denying …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2481-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … the conclusions of the Law Division judge "could reasonably have been reached on sufficient credible evidence present in … L. 2019, c. 271, § 8, eff. 5 A-2481-21 The amendments might have made it easier for defendant to obtain a New Jersey …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3253-22 SB BUILDING ASSOCIATES, LP, SB … exercise that authority even though it does not presently have a plan to devote the property to active recreational … 358 (App. Div. 2005), aff'd, 188 N.J. 531 (2006). As we have noted, the present case arises in the context of a …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1000-17T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … court asked defendant if he understood that his plea may have immigration consequences and if he had discussed the … with each defendant. Plea counsel testified that he would have responded affirmatively to the plea court's inquiry if …