njcourts.gov
… duty, trespass, and promissory estoppel. The Defendants have since brought Counterclaims and Third-Party claims … This action is also consolidated with two other Law Division actions, BUR- L-2145-21, and BUR-L-2768-21. … Id. Next, Plaintiffs argue that Aaron Cave does not have standing to bring derivative claims on behalf of SSG. …
njcourts.gov
… In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. In the Matter of the Investigation of … sample. The court denied the motion, and the Appellate Division affirmed, holding that the State had not shown that … see R. 3:5A-4(c), by retesting stored samples that have been mailed. The NDIS expressly requires a follow-up …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0196-14T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … I can find to disbelieve her, especially since you guys haven't had any contact in two and a half years. She's very … arrived they began kissing. Defendant asked if he could have sex with A.M., and she consented. A.M. testified she …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2834-21 B.B., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … She testified the dispute arose because she refused to have an abortion. Defendant verbally abused plaintiff … capable of; he was a "fucking savage[;]" and he did not "have limits when disrespected." Defendant sent plaintiff a …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2031-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Because the State Failed to Show That It Was Unsafe or May Have Affected Traffic. B. The Tip Did Not Create Reasonable … II SUPPRESSION IS REQUIRED BECAUSE THE TROOPERS DID NOT HAVE REASONABLE AND ARTICULABLE SUSPICION TO REQUEST CONSENT …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0305-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … to go in [her] bedroom." She also testified Carol could not have seen her interaction with defendant outside the bedroom … to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0365-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … following the purported invocation of this right should have been suppressed. Defendant asserts his … you be happy? DEFENDANT: Because at the same time, I don't have no worries. DETECTIVE CASTALDO: Okay. Do you want to …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1461-21 EMPOWERNJ, BLUEWAVENJ, CLEAN … "Such deference is appropriate because . . . 'agencies have the specialized expertise necessary to enact … terms "necessary" and "shall" are not dispositive. As we have noted, "shall" generally conveys a mandatory meaning. …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0756-22 BEAZER EAST, INC., … defendant argued the letter established the LSRP did not have the authority to require the installation of the … N.J. Court Rules, cmt. 5.1 on R. 2:5-1(f) (2025) ("Courts have concluded that only the judgments, 11 A-0756-22 orders …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3089-22 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND … went on vacation and did not make alternate plans to have someone supervise Jane's parenting of Anne in her … then I retracted because I knew the consequences that would have happened." Defendant then testified she was 6 A-3089-22 …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1865-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … it had been a no-knock warrant, a different procedure would have been conducted, and he would have contacted the SWAT commander. He further explained that …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2005-16T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … scrutiny two years later, police obtained a court order to have defendant produced in front of the surveillance cameras … night Fils-Aime was shot but maintained defendant did not have a significant argument or disagreement with Fils-Aime …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3592-16T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.'" Ibid. (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. … 535 U.S. 162, 170 (2002). New Jersey courts, however, have departed from their federal counterparts and "have …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5604-15T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … "was in disarray [her]self, and . . . thought [Joan] would have took that role and did that." 7 A-5604-15T3 Vanessa … it can't exaggerate. The objective evidence doesn't have a motive to color the truth." He asserted, Now, I'm not …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2137-16T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … the left-hand side." Gillespie said defendant could easily have reached the revolver. In the room, the officers also … led to the recorded incriminating statement, which should have been suppressed. We note that defendant never argued in …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3690-13T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … defendant was "very special" to her and she was "lucky to have him." When Kimberly was seventeen and she and her … at the . . . interview that it was possible he could have put his hands on [Kimberly's] chest by accident, or …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3650-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … proof, and both urge us to affirm the termination order. We have considered the arguments raised in light of the record … 2014, the judge entered an order permitting defendant to have visitation with Amy at the MCCI one day per week. …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2784-14T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … where he was going and told him that "she wanted . . . to have sex with" him. Defendant alleged he was reluctant to have sex with M.L., but she began to hug and kiss him. At …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5263-17T1 DANIEL MOTLEY, … "[a]s a licensed professional," defendant "knew or should have known that removal of the walls of the front house … soil. He 13 A-5263-17T1 claims defendant knew or should have known that removal of the walls from the house would …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0133-21 JEROME MASON, … attorney was advised by the title company that Lot 16 may have merged with Lot 9 and the 5 A-0133-21 attorney should … (3) the Zoning Board erred in determining that it did not have jurisdiction to consider plaintiff's variance …