-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted August 30, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Rothstadt and DeAlmeida. On appeal from Superior … M.D., and Syed Ammer Shah, M.D., and dismissing plaintiff's complaint with prejudice. The motion judge denied … . in pursuing discovery. While additional discovery is, in fact, essential, because at the time of the discovery end …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 8, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Accurso and Vernoia. On appeal from Superior … 40:69A-1 to -210, to make certain appointment and budgetary decisions on behalf of the Township. We disagree, and … On February 1, 2016, plaintiff filed a nine-count complaint in lieu of prerogative writs and order to show …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 18, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale, Rothstadt and Mitterhoff. On appeal … that his irrevocable resignation prevented him from complying with N.J.S.A. 18A:66- 40(a), which permits the … and adding that the TPAF Board failed to address the factual issues concerning the reason that he resigned. The …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 21, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Suter. On appeal from the Superior … plaintiff of $111 per week. This was calculated based on income to defendant derived entirely from alimony paid by … acknowledged by the special needs trust. He alleged these facts were a change in circumstances warranting termination …
-
njcourts.gov
… SALIH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … Submitted October 22, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Gooden Brown. On appeal from … answers to interrogatories, and affidavits — "together with all legitimate inferences therefrom favoring the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued May 1, 2018 – Decided May 11, 2018 Before Judges Mawla and DeAlmeida. On appeal from Superior … Okasha and First Link Limo Service, LLC (Law Office of Viscomi & Lyons, attorneys; Daniel Kaye, on the brief). Richard … for reconsideration. We affirm. We briefly summarize the facts from the record. In January 2012, plaintiff was a …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4826-16T5 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL COMMITMENT OF H.E., SVP-518-08. … Argued March 22, 2018 – Decided June 7, 2018 Before Judges Rothstadt and Gooden Brown. On appeal from … that "[t]his does not include dynamic or psychological factors, and it doesn't include his sexualized violence, his …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 10, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli, Carroll and Gooden Brown. On appeal … use initials to identify the witnesses who testified at the factfinding hearing. 3 A-2527-14T3 and depression for which … was not safe, and needed further evaluation. M.F. recommended to defendants that David be immediately admitted …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 24, 2024 – Decided October 17, 2024 Before Judges Susswein and Bergman. On appeal from the New … for Life (PSL), pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:43-6.4. Appellant commenced PSL on May 13, 2020. Appellant signed and agreed … on the same date. In 2020, appellant was charged with manufacturing, delivering, or possessing a controlled substance, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross- Respondent, v. STARNET INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant- Respondent/Cross-Appellant. … Submitted May 1, 2024 – Decided June 6, 2024 Before Judges Currier and Vanek. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 11, 2023 – Decided November 16, 2023 Before Judges Haas and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … record. Defendant Pure Lifestyle is the assignee of a commercial lease which required it to pay plaintiff monthly … answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no …
-
njcourts.gov
… confidentiality of these proceedings. R. 1:38-3(d)(12). NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … DeCastro. We presume the parties are familiar with the facts. To give context to our decision, we summarize the … Dr. Medina diagnosed Mia with suspected child abuse and recommended a second psycho social evaluation and sexually …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 10, 2024 – Decided April 30, 2025 Before Judges Smith and Chase. On appeal from the Superior … judgment to the Amrit defendants. We affirm. I. We view the facts established in a light most favorable to the Amrit … to Fuel One regardless of the ROFR, PMG filed a verified complaint and order to show cause to compel specific …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 20, 2023 – Decided December 8, 2023 Before Judges Vernoia and Gummer. On appeal from the Board of … but incorrect about the date. Petitioner's retirement had become due and payable on October 31, 2019. In a December 1, … administrative determination, detailing its findings of fact and conclusions of law. The Board declined to hold an …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 24, 2023 – Decided May 31, 2023 Before Judges Sumners and Fisher. On appeal from the Superior … stop occurred on August 2-3, the body camera footage and complaint both indicate it occurred on September 2 to 3. 3 … maintaining/operating a controlled dangerous substance manufacturing 5 A-2170-20 facility for another incident. S.H. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 9, 2022 – Decided March 8, 2023 Before Judges Messano and Gummer. On appeal from the Superior … was arrested." We review the PCR court's legal and factual determinations de novo because it rendered its … height to refute the testimony of a witness who had compared his own height to the height of the shooter he had …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 15, 2022 – Decided January 24, 2023 Before Judges Sumners and Susswein. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … by not addressing her mental health issues. After a one-day factfinding hearing, the 1 We use initials and a pseudonym … from the Division's referrals. In its abuse or neglect complaint against defendant, the Division relied upon …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 18, 2023 – Decided January 8, 2024 Before Judges Mawla and Marczyk. On appeal from the Superior … Plaintiff failed to name the proper corporate entity in its complaint—Inserra Supermarkets, Inc. d/b/a ShopRite of … pleading principles underlying Rule 4:26-4 and the specific facts in this case. Rather, the analysis should center on …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 13, 2023 – Decided October 6, 2023 Before Judges Haas, Gooden Brown and Puglisi. On appeal from … for the reasons set forth in Judge Linda Grasso Jones's comprehensive written decision. The parties are fully familiar with the underlying procedural history and facts of this case and, therefore, only a brief summary is …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued February 27, 2024 – Decided March 18, 2024 Before Judges Whipple, Mayer and Enright. On appeal from the … The MSA's provisions continued to govern pending the completion of arbitration.5 Subsequent to their divorce, the … plaintiff since March 2019. Defendant did not dispute this fact. Additionally, during the plenary hearing, defendant …