-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 11, 2025 – Decided July 22, 2025 Before Judges Sumners and Perez Friscia. On appeal from the … of the case." The court "found counsel to be experienced, competent, truthful and credible." In contrast, the court … support of post-conviction relief" based on "view[ing] the facts in the light most favorable to a defendant." State v. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 23, 2025 – Decided November 3, 2025 Before Judges Gooden Brown and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the … Boger appeals from the October 11, 2024 Law Division order compelling arbitration of his claims against defendants … and negligence claims against Beshada be adjudicated together; and (3) the motion court violated the law of the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 2, 2026 – Decided March 11, 2026 Before Judges Sabatino and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … the present matter arose.2 They have three adult children together, none of whom reside with them. According to … are still married to one another, although a divorce complaint has been filed. 3 A-2718-24 with profanity. In his …
njcourts.gov
… et al., Defendants. OPINION I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court by way of (i) the motion of plaintiff, … judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature. II. FACTUAL AND .PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff is the developer …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 13, 2025 – Decided December 1, 2025 Before Judges Mayer and Jacobs. On appeal from the Superior … to the Family Part judge. We limit our recitation of the facts to the issues relevant on appeal. The parties, who … to the consent order as drafted because it failed to compel defendant's payment of child support. Through their …
njcourts.gov
… Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, Respondent. ___________________________ … denial of her claim for Mixed Earners Unemployment Compensation (MEUC) benefits. After reviewing the record in … we affirm. I. We discern the following pertinent facts and procedural history from the record. In March 2020, …
njcourts.gov
… 1 LC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. … COUNTY DOCKET NO. GLO-L-1688-12 CIVIL ACTION OPINION Before the court is Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, Greenwich … will result from the amendment,’ it must weigh such factors against the overriding need to seek justice.”) …
njcourts.gov
… « Citation Data NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … PHARMACY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FRANKLIN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … resolved against defendant. We find no issue of material fact or ambiguity in the terms of plaintiff's policy, and …
njcourts.gov
… * NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE TAX COURT COMMITTEE … request mailed by the assessor for defendant (“City”). The facts and procedural history of the above matter is recited …
njcourts.gov
… NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS SUSAN L. O'KEEFE, Plaintiff, v. EDMUND … - Decided: November 15, 2018 Louis R. Moffa, Jr. attorney for plaintiff (Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads LLP). … answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file together with affidavits, if any, show that there is no …
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 16, 2022 – Decided November 29, 2022 Before Judges Haas and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the Superior … parties prior to the beginning of jury selection. Defendant complained that his appointed attorney did not provide him … for his case and failed to visit him to prepare for 1 The facts adduced at trial concerning the charges are not …
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 15, 2016 - Decided Before Judges Lihotz, Hoffman and O'Connor. On appeal from … an October 2, 2015 order denying his motion to reinstate a complaint against defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc.1 Plaintiff … he suffered infections after using medical wipes manufactured by defendant. The parties agreed to a temporary …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 11, 2023 – Decided January 18, 2023 Before Judges Haas and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the Superior … reverse and remand for further proceedings. The underlying facts concerning the offenses involved in this matter are … ordered, or that any waiver of his privilege concerning his communications with Lane would automatically extend to his …
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 7, 2022 – Decided December 13, 2022 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … argued the cause for respondent (Law Office of Frank A. Viscomi, attorneys; Mario C. Colitti, on the brief). PER CURIAM … the evidence submitted by the parties on the motion, together with all legitimate inferences therefrom favoring the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 20, 2022 – Decided December 15, 2022 Before Judges Haas and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the Superior … parties were in a nine-year dating relationship and lived together for part of that time. In January 2021, plaintiff … restraining order (TRO) once D.I. filed a domestic violence complaint. The court concluded that S.B. engaged in …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 10, 2022 – Decided December 16, 2022 Before Judges Accurso and Firko. On appeal from the Superior … West Windsor-Plainsboro Regional High School. He filed a complaint in the Law Division in 2021, under N.J.S.A. … of Pittsburgh, 224 N.J. 189, 199 (2016), the pertinent facts are as follows. Plaintiff attended defendant's high …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 19, 2022 – Decided December 28, 2022 Before Judges DeAlmeida and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … plaintiff provided her good credit and employment income while defendant provided money for the down payment and … 60 N.J. Super. 399, 408 (App. Div. 1960). 5 A-2449-21 uneasy in in answering certain direct questions. For example, …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 12, 2022 – Decided September 29, 2022 Before Judges Currier and Enright. On appeal from the Superior … parties' child was born in 2016 while they were living together in Florida. In 2018, Cunningham permitted Efaw to … are "manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant and reasonably credible evidence to …
njcourts.gov
… Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, and EQUITY COMMUNICATIONS, L.P., Respondents. … Tribunal's decision, adopting the Tribunal's findings of fact and concluding Essick was ineligible for 7 A-3680-20 …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 8, 2024 – Decided February 1, 2024 Before Judges DeAlmeida and Berdote Byrne. On appeal from the … other children. Instead, we incorporate by reference the factual findings and legal conclusions contained in Judge … the first time in a reply brief."); Bouie v. N.J. Dep't of Comm. Affairs, 407 N.J. Super. 518, 525-26 (App. Div. 2009) …