-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5487-15T1 ASPHALT PAVING SYSTEMS, INC., … from their attorney, who disputed the witness behaved in the manner plaintiff alleged after the arbitrator … somewhat unclear, the standard the court appears to have applied to determine the merits of the request to …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4082-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … defendant argues that his suppression motion should have been granted outright because the affidavit contained … defendant argues: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN DENIED WITHOUT A FRANKS HEARING; ALTERNATIVELY, …
-
njcourts.gov
… : ::: SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY ATLANTIC COUNTY – LAW DIVISION CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO: ATL-L-2516-19 (CBLP) ORDER … and David Perlman (collectively “The Waves Defendants”) have opposed the motion. The court heard oral argument on … also held that the application of judicial estoppel should have prevented Texaco from asserting newly found theories of …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0585-23 BOONTON MOSQUE & ISLAMIC … and review."). As for the motion for reconsideration, we have determined: 6 A-0585-23 Reconsideration itself is "a … as a basis for presenting facts or arguments that could have been provided in opposition to the original motion. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3253-22 SB BUILDING ASSOCIATES, LP, SB … exercise that authority even though it does not presently have a plan to devote the property to active recreational … 358 (App. Div. 2005), aff'd, 188 N.J. 531 (2006). As we have noted, the present case arises in the context of a …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2731-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BERNARDO CHAVEZ- PADILLA, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ … other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. 2 A-2731-21 Defendant Chavez-Padilla appeals from an April 6, 2022 order denying …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2615-22 JAMI ROBLEJO, … Plaintiff and defendant married on April 29, 2016, and have one child, a son, born in September 2017. The parties … marriage, ages nineteen and twenty. These adult children have significant needs and were diagnosed with autism …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1373-22 ARTHERINE PRICE, … if, "but for the event, the [injury] probably would not have happened." Ibid. Proximate cause is "any cause which in … complained of and without which the [injury] would not have occurred." Conklin v. Hannoch Weisman, 145 N.J. 395, …
-
njcourts.gov
… A. PERCIA, Plaintiffs, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION - BERGEN COUNTY DOCKET NO. BER-L-9279-15 MCL MASTER … shall be identified by page and line number and the parties have agreed to use the same 1 This MCL is not an eCourts … shall advise Defendants of any witness for whom Defendants have identified deposition designations to which Plaintiffs …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0638-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … to resentencing and 5 A-0638-21 relies on cases that have prescribed rules for sentencing juveniles. In that … held that under New Jersey's Constitution, juveniles who have previously been sentenced to a mandatory prison term of …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1997-22 U'BAY LUMUMBA, Appellant, v. NEW … Board likewise rejected Lumumba's argument that it should have considered the COVID-19 crisis and his positive COVID … granting parole. Lumumba also argued that the Board should have rescinded its decision denying parole because it relied …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2281-21 LESLIE J. DEANS, … dismissal of the action, to reinstate the complaint, and to have a new "non-binding arbitration." The trial court heard … 381 N.J. Super. 593, 597 (App. Div. 2005)). Accordingly, we have cautioned: [W]hen neither party has made a timely …
-
njcourts.gov
… and EDWARD FLAHERTY, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: BERGEN COUNTY Plaintiffs, DOCKET NO. BER-L-6959-19 … vs. ETIDCON, INC., ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY, a Division of Ethicon, Inc., GYNECARE, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, and … matter, pursuant to Rule 4: 11-5. Plaintiffs have demonstrated the need for certain information to be …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2699-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … under State v. Yarbrough, 100 N.J. 627 (1985). Because we have previously held defendant's sentence is valid, and the … principles amplified by the Torres Court. Because we have previously determined defendant's sentence is valid, …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1638-23 G.S., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … The parties lived together, co-owned their dwelling, and have a child in common. Defendant moved out of the residence … 4 A-1638-23 which she took items and may very well have exchanged words with [plaintiff]. The trial court …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3468-23 CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE … trial or initiate or participate in a class action if you have a dispute with us. Instead, this provision tells you … will not make a better contract for parties than they have voluntarily made for themselves, nor alter their …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2819-22 MODERN INDUSTRIES, MODERN … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Hudson County, Docket No. C-000054-19. Hogan Lovells … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1838-23 JOSEPH C. DIOLOSA JR., … on the brief). PER CURIAM The parties to the appeal have settled the issues between them. In accordance with the stipulation they have filed, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1421-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … order of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Monmouth County, Indictment No. 23-07-0806. Raymond … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2194-23 WEST FRONT STEET INDUSTRIAL, … use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. 2 A-2194-23 We have been advised prior to argument that this matter has been amicably adjusted and the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. …