njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … decision to deny his motion to dismiss the indictment. POINT ONE THE COURT COMMITTED [REVERSIBLE] ERROR IN ITS … review of this interlocutory decision. 3 A-1698-15T1 POINT TWO THE STATE FAILED TO ESTABLISH A RISK OF DEATH OR …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … his application for a resentencing hearing. He argues: POINT I AFTER THE PCR COURT PROPERLY FOUND THAT DEFENDANT … brief he raised the following additional argument: POINT I THE PCR . . . JUDGE ABUSED HER DISCRETION BY FAILING …
njcourts.gov
… and on the brief). PER CURIAM Defendant appeals from a conviction of fourth-degree operating a vehicle during the … of N.J.S.A. 2C:40-26(b). On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I ALTHOUGH STATUTORY CRITERIA AND OTHER FACTORS UNDER … FACTORS IN REJECTING DEFENDANT'S PTI APPLICATION. POINT II DENYING DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO TESTIFY AS TO HIS …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … with defendant presenting the following arguments: POINT ONE THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT'S … (2009). We agree with the PCR court that defendant fails to point to particular facts, and his claims of innocence are …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … merit in Warren's argument about emancipation in Point V to warrant further discussion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). And we agree with Warren's position in Point VI that he had a right to appeal because we find the …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Defendant alleges the following errors on appeal: POINT I THE GUILTY PLEA TO N.J.S.A. 2C:40-26B WAS NOT VALID … STATE V. SLATER.[1] 1 198 N.J. 145 (2009). 5 A-1687-19 POINT II THIS COURT SHOULD REVERSE THE DENIAL OF GENTNER'S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … raise the following arguments for our consideration. POINT I THE PLAINTIFF PROPERLY MITIGATED HIS DAMAGES. POINT II THE COURT SHOULD NOT HAVE DOUBLED THE SECURITY …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … and rendered an oral opinion. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I BECAUSE DEFENDANT RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF … B. [Plea] Counsel Failed to File a Motion to Suppress. POINT II DEFENDANT HAS MADE A PRIMA FACIE SHOWING OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … appeal followed. On appeal. defendant argues the following point: POINT I [DEFENDANT] WAS DENIED A FAIR TRIAL WHEN HEARSAY …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … Defendant appealed, raising the following arguments: POINT ONE MR. COMPANIONI IS ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY … Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). 4 A-2232-19 POINT TWO THE PCR COURT'S RULING THAT MR. COMPANIONI'S …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … defendant now appeals, raising the following arguments: POINT ONE THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT'S … Insisted On Going To Trial But For Such Deficient Advice. POINT TWO THE PCR COURT ERRED WHERE IT DID NOT CONDUCT AN …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … the judge concluded as follows: Other than the isolated point raised by counsel here, there's nothing else in the … a mental[]health evaluation. Defendant raises the following point on this appeal: THE PCR COURT ERRED IN FAILING TO HOLD …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … prejudice the outcome. Now on appeal, defendant raises one point of error: POINT ONE THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT'S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … in his oral decision. Only K.M.B (Karen)1 appeals, arguing: POINT I – THE TRIAL COURT'S ENTRY OF THE FINAL RESTRAINING … Is No Evidence That Appellant Acted With Purpose To Harass. POINT II – THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT RESPONDENT FEARED FOR …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … We affirm. Defendant raises the following issues on appeal. POINT I: MR. BARONE IS ENTITLED TO RELIEF ON HIS CLAIM THAT … OF COUNSEL BY FAILING TO ADVOCATE ADEQUATELY AT SENTENCING. POINT 2: THIS MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR FINDINGS OF FACT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … In his brief on appeal, defendant presents the following points for our consideration: POINT ONE THE PCR COURT ERRED BY DENYING DEFENDANT'S …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … raises the following contentions for our consideration: POINT I THE LAW DIVISION JUDGE FAILED TO AFFORD APPELLANT … THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION POINT II APPELLANT'S RIGHT TO DIRECT APPEAL WAS DENIED DUE …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … he raises the following two contentions for the first time: POINT I THE COURT'S FAILURE TO INQUIRE IF THE APPELLANT WOULD BENEFIT FROM THE AID OF A COURT APPOINTED INTERPRETER VIOLATED APPELLANT'S FUNDAMENTAL DUE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … defendant approached the driver's side of a parked vehicle, pointed a silver handgun at the driver, and ordered her and … 6 A-0332-23 never identified Smith as a witness at any point during her representation of defendant. Smith's …
-
njcourts.gov
… and Safe Families Act … The CPR board must explain the key points of the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 (ASFA) … resource families who appear at the Initial Review. These points include the child’s safety, the child’s need for … … -- ASFA requires that a child's safety be the paramount concern when a child is placed outside of his or her home. …