njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … now solely appeals the PTI ruling. She raises the following point in her brief: THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FINDING THE … the prosecutor rationally concluded in his discretion these points in defendant's favor were outweighed by negative …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … In this appeal, defendant raises the following issues: POINT I: DEFENDANT HAS SUBMITTED PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE … GRANTED AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON POST CONVICTION RELIEF. POINT II: DEFENDANT WAS DENIED EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … MUST BE REDUCED. We do not reach the argument asserted in Point II because we find it necessary to remand for further proceedings regarding the arguments posed in Point I, to which we now turn. After arresting defendant, …
njcourts.gov
… 12, 2016 Law Division order denying her petition for post-conviction relief NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL … unsubstantiated. Now on appeal, defendant raises only one point: POINT I: THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN DENYING THE DEFENDANT'S …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … of his petition for post- conviction relief (PCR), arguing: POINT I BECAUSE COUNSEL DID NOT CORRECTLY EXPLAIN TO HIS … TO BE SERVED, PERFORMANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE. POINT II BECAUSE THE DEFENDANT MADE A PRIMA FACIE SHOWING OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … However, appellate counsel then affirmatively withdrew the point. [APPELLATE COUNSEL]: But I agree that this court has … than eight years. [THE COURT]: Well, in your sheet you pointed out the factual basis as well as the term. …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … the public policy concerns. She concluded: At this point, given the foregoing, the Court will deny the motion … Court will certainly do an in camera review, but at this point the Court finds that these records are certainly …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … at oral argument, petitioner's attorney confirmed that point. Beginning in 2003, petitioner unilaterally … collected from the customers. She testified that at some point, petitioner imposed a new policy, under which the …
njcourts.gov
… on the brief). PER CURIAM Defendant Duke Nyangweso was convicted in municipal court for careless driving, N.J.S.A. … This appeal followed. Before us, defendant argues: POINT ONE [THE] BURDEN OF PROOF IS UPON THE STATE TO PROVE EACH ELEMENT OF CARELESS DRIVING. 4 A-2500-15T3 POINT TWO THE [LAW DIVISION] CLEARLY MISINTERPRETED THE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … him with escape. Before us, defendant argues in a single point: THE TRIAL COURT'S ERRONEOUS DECISION TO DENY … belongings with him and never returned. All the evidence pointed to defendant's singular purpose being his escape, …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … This appeal followed. Defendant argues the following point on appeal. 4 A-4785-14T2 POINT I THE COURT BELOW ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION …
njcourts.gov
… the brief). PER CURIAM In appealing the denial of his post-conviction relief (PCR) petition, defendant argues that the … BASED ON GUILTY PLEAS. We find insufficient merit in Point II to warrant further discussion in a written opinion. … We agree, however, with that part of defendant's Point I that asserts the judge erred by refusing to conduct …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … On appeal, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT ONE The Exhibits Offered by Defendant at Trial and … Were Summaries Properly Admissible under [N.J.R.E.] 1006. POINT TWO The Trial Court’s Factual Finding as to the Amount …
default
… January 10, 2019 – Decided July 26, 2019 Before Judges O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … On appeal, defendant argues the following: 6 A-0198-17T2 POINT I: THE DENIAL OF A POST-TRIAL GRAVES ACT WAIVER … AND IS ENTITLED TO A HEARING BEFORE THE ASSIGNMENT JUDGE. POINT II: ROBERT BILLARD WAS DENIED DUE PROCESS AND …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … Defendant raises the following arguments on appeal: POINT I: 1 Judge Steele did not preside over defendant's … v. Washington and misapplying Alleyne v. United States. POINT II: THE RE-SENTENCING JUDGE ERRED IN IMPOSING A FINE. …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … Defendant argued he was dissatisfied with his court appointed trial counsel. He also claimed no gun was recovered … is to ignore the truth of life, which is that anybody who points a gun or uses a gun toward another person is …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … We affirm. Defendant raises the following issues on appeal: POINT I: THE [PCR] COURT ERRED IN DENYING THE DEFENDANT'S … C. FAILURE OF PCR COURT TO CONDUCT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING. POINT II: THIS MATTER MUST BE REMANDED FOR FINDINGS OF FACT …
njcourts.gov
… has not filed a brief. PER CURIAM In this breach of contract case, plaintiff appeals from a July 16, 2019 … plaintiff raises the following arguments: 5 A-5295-18T1 [POINT I] THE [JUDGE] ERRED IN DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST … A JUDGMENT BASED ON LIES IS NOT A FAIR AND JUST ONE. [POINT II] THE JUDGMENT IS BASED ON THE FALSE ASSUMPTION THAT …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … or vacate the judgment. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I THE JUDGE'S DECISION WAS ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS … ABSENCE AFTER SHE WAS INSTRUCTED NOT TO COME TO COURT. POINT II THE [JUDGE] NEVER TOOK THE TIME TO HEAR FROM THE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … On appeal, defendant raises the following contentions: POINT I CONTRARY TO THE TRIAL COURT'S ORDER DATED APRIL 11, … ELIGIBLE FOR THE TERMINATION OF MEGAN'S LAW REQUIREMENTS. POINT II CONTRARY TO THE TRIAL COURT'S ORDER DATED APRIL 11, …