-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0196-18T2 IN THE MATTER OF THE ANNA … because the initial allocation if left undisturbed would have had a present day value of $2,229,028.90, Keiser should … Keiser's letters of trusteeship before 2016, they would have discovered that no letters were ever issued. The …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3012-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … THE 180-DAY PERIOD HAS BEEN TOLLED. A. The State did not have to request a continuance in open court pursuant to … he shall be brought to trial within 180 days after he shall have caused to be delivered to the prosecuting officer and …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3559-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … of counsel because of the chilling effect it would have on defense investigation. Defense counsel would be … that inculpatory material would be disclosed which might have to be turned over to the State. [Id. at 478–79.] The …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2855-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … possession, so just because they didn't physically have it on their person at that time, they were still in … in the possession of the occupant or occupants who own or have authority to operate the vehicle. The prosecutor then …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2240-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … investigation (PSI) report had never been prepared, and we have previously held a sentence imposed without the benefit … are constrained to remand once again for resentencing. 1 We have omitted the subpoints of this argument. 5 A-2240-19 We …
-
njcourts.gov
… OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY MORRIS COUNTY LAW DIVISION, CRIMINAL PART INDICTMENT NO. 18-08-0647 STATE OF NEW … v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979), a defendant does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in his location … States Supreme Court held that an individual does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in bank records as …
-
njcourts.gov
… OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY MORRIS COUNTY LAW DIVISION, CRIMINAL PART INDICTMENT NO. 18-08-0647 STATE OF NEW … v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979), a defendant does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in his location … States Supreme Court held that an individual does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in bank records as …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1799-21 A-3484-22 R.S., … back-to-back and consolidated for purposes of this opinion, have their genesis in the parties' volatile relationship and … any credible evidence, when a reasonable person could not have expected its success, or when it is completely …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2068-23 MICHAEL A. GALLARDO, ESQ., … provides, in relevant part: The [p]artnership does not have a formal Limited Liability Partnership Agreement as in … was called into question, and additional documents that have been produced, and that will be those documents related …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0246-23 IN THE MATTER OF CHALLENGE BY … to -29.10. Blackridge also alleged the development would have an adverse impact on Blackridge as well as the public … by 290 Ocean where several nearby structures did not have the 5 A-0246-23 required step-back from the dune or …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3648-18T1 ROBERT ZIENIUK, … the judge acknowledged that defendant's argument may have merit but concluded that because of the substantial … Had defendant provided the documents sooner, "they would have been subjected to the scrutiny of the discovery …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-6004-17T2 PETER HILAL and DI HILAL, … 2A:18-61.2(f). 4 A-6004-17T2 case ruled tenants did not have an option to renew but dismissed the case without … In these circumstances, Landlord shall be considered to have accepted the partial payment without prejudice and …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2357-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … with her maternal aunt and uncle. These resource parents have cared for Ginger ever since, she is strongly bonded to … set forth in our opinion. Ibid. 5 Defendant and M.B. have another child, A.D. (Audrey), born in November 2015. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2248-18T2 NEW JERSEY MOTOR VEHICLE … Thus, every OBD scan of each of these vehicles should have produced the same 5 A-2248-18T2 data for each of these … It reasoned that "[r]espondents were found to have willfully violated the regulations twenty-one separate …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5529-17T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … As the Supreme Court reiterated in State v. Ways, "[w]e have held that all three prongs of that test must be … appeared and gave testimony, that testimony would have been detrimental to defendant's interest," citing State …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2406-16T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … found during his arrest, arguing that Simpkins did not have valid consent from K.S. or defendant to search … [or her] opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the 'feel' of the case, which a reviewing court cannot …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3436-18T2 B.E.D.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, … he's pointed at it to me before [sic]. And if I didn't have sex with him, he would come . . . and point at it. And … I was taking a shower. I was pregnant. And then I had to have sex with him after that. 6 A-3436-18T2 "And you know, …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0613-18T3 FRIENDS OF HISTORIC … consent orders and related proceedings in the Law Division have upon the arguments raised for our consideration. 7 … area was necessary for the success of the endeavor. We have considered these arguments in light of the record and …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1989-17T2 BOROUGH OF HIGHLAND PARK, … The order stated it was entered because defendant did not have at the construction site or submit to the construction … pertaining to defendant's project on the house, and did not have a copy of the plans defendant submitted to the borough …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4118-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … is intended. 3 A-4118-17T4 It is well-settled that parents have a fundamental constitutional right to raise their … whose vulnerable lives or psychological well-being may have been harmed or may be seriously endangered by a …