-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1390-16T2 C.G., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The trial canvassed not only the communications to which we have alluded but also those that were transmitted to Carol's … in criminal coercion as defined by N.J.S.A. 2C:13-5. As we have noted, the communications that inspired this …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0142-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … The application of that one mitigating factor would not have been enough to conclude that the mitigating factor … indictments. Defendant claimed the trial court should have taken into consideration that he had compensated one …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5383-14T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … defendant guilty of second-degree certain persons not to have weapons, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-7(b), the trial judge NOT FOR … error or omission . . . unless it is of such a nature as to have been clearly capable of producing an unjust result[.]" …
-
njcourts.gov
… In the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) State v. Rainlin Vasco (A-54-17) … Instead, the Court reverses the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge … defendant’s plea allocution, he was asked, “[Y]ou didn’t have a lawful purpose for that knife, right?” He answered, …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1020-20 JOSE VARGAS, Appellant, v. NEW … call any witnesses. Moreover, the hearing officer did not have an obligation to independently investigate this matter. … affirm the DOC's final decision. Any remaining arguments we have not addressed directly are without sufficient merit to …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0870-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … of the JOC. Defendant also alleged that the JOC should not have been corrected. Following oral argument, the PCR judge … that, but for the deficient performance, the result would have been different. Defendant's plea attorney had defendant …
-
njcourts.gov
… Corp., and McKesson Corp SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION – MIDDLESEX COUNTY MCL NO.: 629 DOCKET NO.: … Bern & Partners LLP, upon notice to all interested parties, have moved before this Court to Reinstate Plaintiff’s … arguing that many Plaintiffs subject to CMO 8 did not have specific vaccination records because Zostavax is widely …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1582-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Bray. Specifically, he argues that his trial counsel should have pressed Bray on the inconsistencies in Bray's … that pressing Bray on those inconsistencies would have resulted in an acquittal by the jury. In short, …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2901-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … PRIOR TO THE COMPLETION OF THE TEST, THE A.I.R. SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE. 1 An IID is a "blood … Such a conclusion, as Judge Batista noted, would have far reaching consequences beyond defendant's case. We …
-
1.12T
Charges Document PDF
njcourts.gov
… CHARGE 1.12T — Page 1 of 1 1.12 GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR STANDARD CHARGE (Approved 11/98) T. Jury Verdict Sheet I have prepared a jury verdict sheet which I believe should … and answer within the framework of the instructions that I have given you. I will now review these questions with you. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY A-38 September Term 2021 086126 State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Woodrow Miller, Defendant-Respondent. O R D E R The Court having considered this matter further and having determined that certification was …
-
njcourts.gov
FILED, Clerk of the Supreme Court, 05 Apr 2024, 087997 In the Matter of James Hartnett, Pennsauken. (James Hartnett - Appellant) SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY A-15 September Term 2023 087997 ORDER This matter having been duly considered and the .Court …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1355-24 EDARIEL MELENDEZ, Appellant, v. … erred in reaching a conclusion that could not reasonably have been made on a showing of the relevant factors. … own judgment for the agency's, even though the court might have reached a different result." Blanchard v. N.J. Dep't of …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2255-24 IN THE MATTER OF NORMA I. VELEZ. … Sally Velez. Respondents Norma Velez and Norma I. Velez and have not filed a brief. PER CURIAM Sally Velez appeals from … of sale within [forty-five] days 5 A-2255-24 which would have been at the end of January. The seller Norma I. . . . …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3634-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … he pleaded guilty to second-degree certain persons not to have weapons, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-7(b)(1), and a January 3, 2024 … 2C:21-25(a); and second-degree certain persons not to have weapons, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-7(b)(1). 7 A-3634-23 II. On …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3647-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … unforeseeable; and (2) the scope of the search should not have extended to the compartment beneath the cargo area. … was not acting on any prior tip or information that would have been actionable before spotting Toomer. After Officer …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1600-24 KAREN HANCOCK, … N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-27. An additional period of sixty days may have been granted upon a showing of "good cause." Ibid. … of Drs. Casagrande and Shaker, stating "plaintiff seeks to have the dismissal reversed and the case reinstated so that …
njcourts.gov
… OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY MORRIS COUNTY LAW DIVISION, CIVIL PART DOCKET NO. L-734-13 MUSASHI, L.L.C. AND … with wrongful and illegal conduct. As New Jersey Courts have explained: 1 It should also be noted that New Jersey … and free to reject their verdicts); Mercantile & General Reinsurance Co., PLC v. Colonial 12 Assurance Co., 82 N.Y.2d …
njcourts.gov
… ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION: BERGEN COUNTY DOCKET No. C-292-18 OPINION Argued: … will not set aside an award “merely because the court would have decided the facts or construed the law differently.” … of the Estate of Edward Liva Sr., the final award must have either been procured as a result of fraud or undue …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … IRREVOCABLY AND VOLUNTARILY WAIVE ANY RIGHT THEY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY DISPUTE. … hearing. A-4771-11T3 7 affidavits to which he would have the opportunity to respond in kind. The arbitrator …