njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … there." C.R. raises the following contentions on appeal: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION WHEN IT … SUFFICIENT TO DESCRIBE A PREDICATE OR A NEED FOR AN FRO. POINT II THE TRIAL COURT FAILED TO DISCUSS OR EXAMINE THE …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … denial. He advances the following argument in his brief: POINT I THE FAILURE OF TRIAL COUNSEL TO NEGOTIATE A PLEA … TO THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL Elaborating on this point, defendant asserts that "[a]lthough the [S]tate was …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … makes two arguments, which he articulates as follows: POINT I – THE [PCR] COURT ERRED IN DENYING THE DEFENDANT'S … WAS THE ONLY WITNESS TO IDENTIFY THE DEFENDANT AT TRIAL[.] POINT II – DEFENDANT WAS DENIED THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … presented to the Law Division. Defendant contends: POINT 1 – DEFENDANT WAS ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING … SUCH AN INSTRUCTION WAS CLEARLY SUPPORTED BY THE FACTS. POINT II – DEFENDANT WAS ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … 437 N.J. Super. 90, 97-98 (App. Div. 2014). Fenner argues: [POINT I] A. STANDARDS OF REVIEW 1. THE APPELLATE DIVISION … PROOF[S] WERE SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. [POINT II] B. PLAINTIFF[] U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION['S] …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … a pro se supplemental brief raising the following single point, which we renumber: IV. DEFENDANT'S GRAVES ACT … R. 2:11-3(e)(2). We add only a few comments regarding Point I. At the suppression hearing, the only testimony came …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … only a few brief comments. 3 A-5138-17T3 We reject Philip's Points II and III by referring to our standard of review, … Super. 112, 126- 27 (App. Div. 2006). We lastly turn to Point I and Philip's argument that the judge was not …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … brief on the present appeal, defendant raises the following points: POINT I THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … stated: I'm going to deny [defendant's] appeal at this point and find that [the] State did prove beyond a … in the brief. There's still no testimony even at that point that [defendant] provided the insurance card. This …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … defendant raises the following arguments: 4 A-4066-15T1 POINT I. BECAUSE COUNSEL DID NOT CORRECTLY EXPLAIN TO HIS … TO BE SERVED, PERFORMANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE. POINT II. BECAUSE DEFENDANT MADE A PRIMA FACIE SHOWING OF …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … particulars contained in the moving and opposing papers in pointing out where factual disputes may appear. We conclude … is to follow, we recognize there is no dispute that at some point prior to the attempt to serve the notice, defendants …
njcourts.gov
… court's February 14, 2017 order denying his motion for post-conviction relief ("PCR") without an evidentiary hearing. We … of voluntary intoxication. We rejected both of those points. State v. Adams, No. A-0727-11, slip op. at 5-11. In … analysis. On appeal, defendant raises the following sole point for our consideration: THIS MATTER MUST BE REMANDED …
njcourts.gov
… from the June 15, 2017 order denying his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR) without an evidentiary hearing. … dated December 10, 2012.1 On this appeal, defendant argues: POINT I: COUNSEL RENDERED CONSTITUTIONALLY INEFFECTIVE … of the mitigating and aggravating factors. The judge pointed to specific references defense counsel made to …
njcourts.gov
… from an April 6, 2016 order, denying his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR) without an evidentiary NOT FOR … court's analysis . . . ." On appeal, defendant raises one point for our consideration: POINT ONE MR. MADRIGAL IS ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … se PCR petition which he later amended. After counsel was appointed, defendant submitted a certification in further … 7 A-1216-17T4 On appeal, defendant raises the following point: POINT I THE POST-CONVICTION RELIEF COURT ERRED WHEN …
njcourts.gov
… an October 20, 2015 order denying his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR) NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE … term. Defendant raises the following issues on appeal: POINT I: THE COURT'S FINDINGS DENYING POST- CONVICTION … OF THE STATE'S CASE AND THE PROPRIETY OF PLEADING GUILTY. POINT II: THE COURT'S RULING DENYING POST- CONVICTION RELIEF …
njcourts.gov
… from the July 29, 2015 order denying his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR) NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE … of defendant's plea. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT ONE DEFENDANT/APPELLANT ESTABLISHED A PRIMA FACIE CASE … ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WARRANTING AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING. POINT TWO DEFENDANT/APPELLANT WAS ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … On appeal, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I THE MOTION COURT ERRED IN DENYING THE MOTION TO … WITHOUT [SIGNALING] MIGHT HAVE HAD AN EFFECT ON TRAFFIC. POINT II THIS CASE MUST BE REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING BECAUSE …
njcourts.gov
… from a Law Division order denying his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR), seeking to withdraw his guilty plea … presenting the following arguments for consideration: POINT I IN POST-CONVICTION RELIEF, WHEN THE DEFENDANT … FROM TRIAL COUNSEL CONTESTING DEFENDANT'S CLAIMS. POINT II THE PCR COURT'S RULINGS VIOLATED DEFENDANT'S RIGHT …
njcourts.gov
… Defendant appeals from the denial of his motion for reconsideration of his second petition for post-conviction … Defendant filed a second PCR petition and a request for appointed counsel, both of which were denied by order dated … presents the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I TRIAL COUNSEL FAILED TO CONSULT A HANDWRITING EXPERT …