-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2902-17T2 JENNY J. SUNG-LEE, … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Bergen County, Docket No. … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY IN RE: RISPERDAL / SEROQUEL / …
-
njcourts.gov
CPM-22-000535 12/08/2023 Pg 1 of 1 Trans ID: CRM20231225987 PREPARED BY THE COURT Superior Court of New Jersey Criminal Courts Complex 4997 Unami Boulevard Mays Landing, NJ 08330 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ERNEST V. TROIANO, JR. FILED DECO 8 2023 Bernard E. …
-
#30-62
Administrative Directives
njcourts.gov
… 6, 1963 Issued by: Chief Justice Joseph Weintraub I have recently had a letter from the Attorney General passing on a suggestion from the Director of the Division of Civil Rights that the courts in their opinions … of race unless there is a cogent reason for so doing. I have advised the Attorney General that I would call the …
-
#10-69
Administrative Directives
njcourts.gov
… he or she should be permitted, at counsel's own expense, to have a certified shorthand reporter make a record of the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Defendant. \ SUPERJOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION, BERGEN COUNTY DOCKET NO.: BER-L-004287-21 CIVIL …
njcourts.gov
… Board affirmed the panel’s determinations. The Appellate Division affirmed the denial of parole. The Court granted … “prior opportunity(ies) on . . . (probation/parole) has (have) failed to deter criminal behavior”; (10) “prior opportunity(ies) on . . . (probation, parole) has (have) been violated/terminated/revoked in the past for …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1940-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … lacked "a reasonable articulable suspicion that would [have] justif[ied] a temporary seizure of his person or … that we're speaking with, with direct evidence that we have to see if they're telling the truth or lying to us. …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3125-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … the restaurant on both occasions. Third, the court should have voir dired potential jurors about their knowledge and … it look like the suspect had gloves on? [Burk]: He did not have gloves on. [State]: The suspect's clothing, was it …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3984-21 PAUL G. BRENNAN, ESTHER KOAI, … nearby lots formerly in common ownership and should not have been sold without subdivision approval . Plaintiffs … BHBP determined at its January 15, 2020 meeting it did not have jurisdiction to consider the appeal/application because …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2847-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … will "lead to a reversal of a conviction. Only those that have the clear capacity to cause an unjust result will do … the error led the jury to a result it otherwise might not have reached." Ibid. (quoting State v. Macon, 57 N.J. 325, …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1639-22 IN THE MATTER OF FLOOD HAZARD … approval. Respondents further assert that TWI's arguments have no substantive merit. For the reasons that follow, we … within ninety days, that application "shall be deemed to have been approved." N.J.S.A. 13:1D-32. This period may be …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5398-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … "[h]e was faced with a Hobson's choice: remain silent and have his fiancé[e] also charged[,] leaving their four … items found during the raid, Abarno explained he wanted to have an "honest" conversation with defendant and wanted …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … ANY PROBATIVE VALUE. D. THE STATE'S EXPERT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN PERMITTED TO TESTIFY THAT DRUG DEALERS CARRY GUNS … TRIAL BY THE COURT'S MANAGEMENT OF VOIR DIRE, WHICH MAY HAVE HAD A CHILLING EFFECT 2 State v. Odom, 116 N.J. 65 …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5119-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … of right until all claims against the remaining defendants have been resolved by motion or entry of a judgment … 496, 509 (1990)). 17 A-5119-17T1 Teri's claim she did not have a right to appeal the June 6, 2016 dispositional order …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2307-18 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … and went back to their bedroom. A minute or two later, 2 We have renumbered defendant's pro se argument to avoid … He was carrying a black handgun, of the type that "police have." Eric began to retreat into the hallway, where the …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5525-17 A-2208-18 IN THE MATTER OF NEW … facing the bay, has substantially eroded and several people have built and occupied homes across from the CDF. The DOT … -30 ("FWPA") for the CDF project. They argue the DEP should have conducted the more rigorous process for issuing what is …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3620-19 LEONARD KESSELMAN, … by the landlord, the Family Trust; and Leonard did not have a vested fifty percent interest in the Chelsea … increase Terri's future interest in the Building, as they have done. People may freely dispose of their property as …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4875-18 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … verbally announce their intention to arrest him and did not have probable cause to make an arrest. Finally, defendant … THE PREJUDICE OF DICKENS' COMMENT. POINT II MILIEN SHOULD HAVE BEEN FOUND NOT GUILTY OF THE DISORDERLY PERSONS OFFENSE …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … ANY PROBATIVE VALUE. D. THE STATE'S EXPERT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN PERMITTED TO TESTIFY THAT DRUG DEALERS CARRY GUNS … TRIAL BY THE COURT'S MANAGEMENT OF VOIR DIRE, WHICH MAY HAVE HAD A CHILLING EFFECT 2 State v. Odom, 116 N.J. 65 …