njcourts.gov
… Argued October 6, 2025 – Decided December 2, 2025 Before Judges Sabatino, Natali, and Bergman. On appeal from an … (EEO) office. As a result of that filing, NJTA promptly commenced an internal investigation and retained two lawyers … "a manifest particularized divergence between the clients' factual contentions or legal assertions, or remedies they …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … a/k/a Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., (defendant) dismissing his complaint alleging race and national origin employment … erred by failing to (1) consider "all of the evidence together" as a pattern of discriminatory conduct, rather than …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5341-14T4 OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MERCER INSURANCE COMPANY, … OF NEW JERSEY, Third-Party Defendant- Respondent. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … Petitioners-Appellants, v. ANGELICA ALLEN-MCMILLAN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, NEW … public-school students. However, Lakewood's education budget has been severely strained by its obligation to provide …
njcourts.gov
… Road Cedar Grove, New Jersey 07009 (973) 239-5700 Attorneys for Defendants, Matthew Richards and Mars Media, LLC NIK … and MARS MEDIA, LLC, a New Jersey Limited Liability Company, Defendants. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW … Action No.: 2:22-cv-01209-CCC-JR (the “Federal Action”). Factual Background The Federal Action On or about March 4, …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … developer and a member in several real estate holding companies and a construction company, the Property was to be … court must determine whether any genuine issues of fact exist, and whether the trial judge correctly applied …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 25, 2023 – Decided January 18, 2024 Before Judges Vernoia and Gummer. On appeal from the Board of … Insurance $13,272 in Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation (PEUC) benefits the Division had paid to … the claimant did not misrepresent or withhold a material fact to obtain benefits, and . . . proof that the recovery …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … 20, 2023 orders denying his motions to dismiss the amended complaint by Doriana 2 We refer to Dr. Loesberg as defendant … should have been conducted to bring the parties together to address the applicability of the AOM waiver order …
njcourts.gov
… TONY PING YEW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FMI INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. ___________________________ … Argued February 13, 2023 – Decided March 29, 2023 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … the motion, the trial court found no dispute of material facts and no legal basis for the claims. Plaintiff's …
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 20, 2023 – Decided April 14, 2023 Before Judges Smith and Marczyk. On appeal from the Board of … later being promoted to detective, and eventually becoming a K-9 officer.1 In September of 2014, Freeman was … determination was its to make, but rather whether the factfinder could reasonably so conclude upon the proofs." …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 5, 2025 – Decided February 21, 2025 Before Judges Mayer and Puglisi. On appeal from the Superior … 7, 2020 letter, the Township notified Skikus: [I]t has come to our attention that under Chapter 78 of P.L. 2011, … affirmed the Appellate Division's decision in Meyers. The facts in Meyers are similar to the facts in this matter. …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted August 27, 2024 – Decided September 17, 2024 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Vinci. On appeal from the … divide mediation costs in accordance with the parties' income; and denying defendant an award of counsel fees. Among … for three years as contemplated in the MSA. However, the fact that she was now "required by [their a]greement to move …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON … or the other – must establish in the mind of the trier of fact “a firm belief or conviction as to the truth of th[at] …
njcourts.gov
… Argued June 4, 2024 – Decided August 1, 2024 Before Judges Rose and Smith. On appeal from the Superior … failed to conduct a plenary hearing to resolve disputed facts concerning defendant's intention to retire and his … the fifteenth of the month. Alimony is based on imputed income to the Husband of $200,000 and imputed income to the …
njcourts.gov
… HUDAK, TAMMY RUSSO-HUDAK, Third-Party Defendants. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … . . . proceeds at his or her peril by insufficiently completing the [NOA] or CIS. The appellant should explicitly … . . . . Such review shall be both upon the law and the facts . . . ." 11 Rule 2:10-4 states: "Every summary …
njcourts.gov
… INC., and VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC CORPORATION, d/b/a VRAD, NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … Mahalchick, an eighty-one-year-old woman with multiple comorbidities, was taken and admitted to the emergency room … The scheduling of the experts' depositions, together with the attorneys' schedules, had created …
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 22, 2024 – Decided November 21, 2024 Before Judges Smith and Vanek. On appeal from the Superior … the cause for respondents (Law Offices of Frank A. Viscomi, attorneys; Hillary C. Kruger, on the brief). PER … there were no genuinely disputed issues of material fact from which a reasonable jury could conclude defendant …
njcourts.gov
… Respondents, v. HITACHI CAPITAL AMERICA CORP., NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … an order that extended discovery. We affirm. We glean the facts and procedural history from the motion records. Branca was the owner of commercial property located in East Rutherford. Murray Hill …
njcourts.gov
… NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0929-23 MONARCH COMMUNITIES, LLC, a Limited Liability Company of the State … Jersey Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff-Respondent, NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … principal focus although the [b]oard did not articulate the factual basis for that conclusion." Therefore, 8 A-0929-23 …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 29, 2024 – Decided November 4, 2024 Before Judges Smith and Chase. On appeal from the Superior … the reasons which follow, we affirm. I. We incorporate the facts and relevant procedural history from our opinion … certif. granted, 244 N.J. 262 (2020). We recite the salient combined facts and history from our opinion: In 2013, J.R. …