Filters
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5659-14T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … relief (PCR) without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have outlined the relevant facts in our prior opinion … unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Strickland, supra, 466 U.S. at 687, …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MARC KIRKLAND (13-08-0432, SOMERSET COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0114-15T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … and announced "this is a robbery, give me all your money, I have a bomb." Defendant pulled two pillowcases out of his … of rent. In his letter to the landlord, defendant stated "I have your money." The police learned that defendant was …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DIANA M. HOFFMAN (10-10-1007, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4272-14T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … the judge concluded the assertion plea counsel should have secured consecutive sentences in the separate matters … County to follow sentencing in Monmouth County would have resulted in the imposition of a concurrent sentence. …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3584-15T2 A-3585-15T2 NEW JERSEY … with whom Ian has lived since shortly after his birth, have "begun to establish" a healthy and strong bond with … & Family Servs. v. F.M., 211 N.J. 420, 427 (2012). Here, we have no hesitation in concluding the Division proved with …
- A-1328-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1328-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … namely the police reports involved are voluminous. We have multi and out-of-state detectives from up New York … results which may or may not be relevant, but nevertheless have not been received by the State. And the State is not …
- A-0696-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0696-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … I THE TRAFFIC STOP WAS UNLAWFUL BECAUSE POLICE DID NOT HAVE REASONABLE SUSPICION THAT THE CAR WAS IN VIOLATION OF … also raises the following argument in reply, which we have renumbered: [POINT II] DEFENDANTS CHALLENGED THE …
- A-2737-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2737-19 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … 1 Due to the severity of his mental illness, M.F. does not have the ability to communicate his wishes or desires. 3 … a trial judge's decision the utmost deference because "they have the 'opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to …
- A-0333-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0333-20 T.N.Q., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … behavior in order to conform to his objective, which was to have a relationship with the plaintiff." Further, the judge … contrary to subsection (a) of N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4. As we have noted, "[a]nnoyance means to disturb, irritate, or …
- A-0110-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0110-20 MICHAEL J. REDENBURG, … and [plaintiff] on the same email thread as they have criminal complaints filed against each other for … (3) to achieve the objects of the litigation; and (4) that have some connection or logical relation to the action." …
- A-3907-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3907-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … we concur with her conclusion that defendant's arguments have no substantive merit and that an evidentiary hearing is … not ineffective with respect to the sentencing process. We have already upheld the sentence as non-excessive and …
- A-0502-21 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0502-21 STEVE J. HOURAN, … to reinstate his complaint pursuant to Rule 1:13-7(a), to have all his claims relate back to the original filing date … and Estate of Semprevivo, 468 N.J. Super. at 15, defendants have not presented any evidence to support their general …
- A-0778-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0778-20 MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., … plaintiff's allegations, averring that she "does not have sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief … was inadmissible hearsay therefore the court should not have considered it. Specifically, she claims that Madison …
- A-1334-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1334-20 IN THE MATTER OF SEIZURE OF … the [June 2006 and November 2006] incidents . . . may not have risen to the level of domestic violence under N.J.S.A. … seized pursuant to the [PDVA] and his firearm and FPIC have not been returned." Appellant raises the following …
- A-0902-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0902-20 CHARLES STENGER and DEBORAH … of Torts § 356 (Am. L. Inst. 1965)). Over time, courts have modified that general rule so that in certain … genuine issues as to whether a vacationing lessee would have reasonably noticed the dangerous condition. Id. at 461. …
- A-3813-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3813-19 SIXTH BORO RENTALS, LLC, … were making payments . . . it led the landlord to not have any information with regard to who was making these . . … 6 A-3813-19 The judge noted that while "prior landlords may have known . . . there was no testimony . . . [from] or any …
- A-1347-18 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1347-18 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … the custodial portion of his sentence and the parties have not challenged the sentence on appeal. Under these … unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Id. at 60-61 (quoting Strickland, 446 …
- A-3200-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3200-20 U.S. BANK TRUST, NATIONAL … Moreover, there is nothing new presented or that could not have been presented in the prior applications. Finally, … "in an action if the claim or defense and the main action have a question of law or fact in common." "The test is …
- A-0302-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0302-20 D.R. and A.R.1, … to pay plaintiffs' share of the therapeutic costs, and have that payment deducted from the $50,000 in counsel fees … therapy cost allocation, arguing again that they should not have to share those expenses with defendants. In granting …
- A-3087-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3087-18T3 OLIVER V. SHORT, III, … Again, plaintiff argued he was "seeking a remedy to have the [j]udge perform . . . [her] mandatory ministerial … OF ORDERS OR JUDG[]MENTS [A]FFECTING THEIR LEGAL RIGHTS. We have carefully considered plaintiff's contentions in view of …
- A-0903-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0903-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … also must show that changed circumstances in his health have occurred since the time of the original sentence. . . . … A-0903-20 . . . The change of circumstances most likely to have occurred between the sentencing and the hearing is the …