-
njcourts.gov
… GROUP LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY,1 Defendant-Respondent. ____________________________ … Argued March 29, 2023 – Decided August 15, 2023 Before Judges Accurso and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … answers to interrogatories and admissions on f ile, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 18, 2024 – Decided February 2, 2024 Before Judges Firko and Vanek. On appeal from the Superior … assistance by failing to raise certain mitigating factors during the sentencing hearing. We affirm the court's … 2C:2-6; second-degree possession of a weapon during the commission of a controlled dangerous substance (CDS) …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 31, 2023 – Decided November 21, 2023 Before Judges Whipple, Mayer and Paganelli. On appeal from the … by two MCJDC officers. In October 2018, plaintiff filed a complaint against defendants, asserting claims for assault, … a violation of her civil rights. Plaintiff contends the facts in her complaint and amended complaint established a …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 14, 2023 – Decided October 19, 2023 Before Judges Vernoia, Gummer and Walcott- Henderson. On … Investment, LLC (Zawa) appeals from an order dismissing its complaint, with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 4:6-2(e), … certification of Stella Lam in which she made extensive factual assertions. After a single thirty-day adjournment, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 4, 2024 – Decided March 25, 2024 Before Judges Sabatino and Vinci. On appeal from the Division of Workers' Compensation, Department of Labor and Workforce Development, … we affirm. We briefly summarize the pertinent facts derived from the record, which are largely undisputed. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 18, 2025 – Decided July 16, 2025 Before Judges Bishop-Thompson and Augostini. On appeal from … of a child by a caretaker, N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(a)(1). The facts and procedural history are set forth at length in the PCR judge's written decision that accompanied the order under review. In June 2018, during the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 6, 2026 – Decided January 16, 2026 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Rose. On appeal from the … five-year time bar under Rule 3:22-12(a)(1), we affirm. The facts underlying defendant's 1996 convictions are … of the negotiated plea agreement, the State agreed to recommend a probationary term conditioned upon defendant's …
-
njcourts.gov
… WHITE EAGLE INC., Third-Party Defendants- Respondents. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … we conclude the trial court improperly usurped the jury's fact-finding role as to the issues of proximate causation and comparative negligence. We reverse the orders granting …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 10, 2025 – Decided February 3, 2026 Before Judges Gummer and Vanek. On appeal from the Superior … discretion, we affirm. I. We recount the following salient facts from the record. On December 13, 2023, plaintiff Marietta Atkinson filed a complaint for divorce against defendant. The parties filed …
njcourts.gov
… APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3776-23 W.M. and M.A.M.,1 Complainants-Appellants, v. JOSHUA AIKENS, DEBORAH FAGAN, … Submitted May 29, 2025 – Decided June 24, 2025 Before Judges Mayer and Rose. On appeal from the School Ethics … based on their child's medical needs and, as such, "de facto deni[ed]" home instruction in violation of N.J.A.C. …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1170-10T1 COMBINED COMPUTER RESOURCES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … oral opinion of September 16, 2010. These are the pertinent facts. CCR is a provider of information technology …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … Agreement provided that Marino's five percent stake in the company entitled him to 500 membership units. It also set … party, are sufficient to permit a A-5630-10T1 4 rational factfinder to resolve the alleged disputed issue in favor of …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 14, 2022 – Decided September 20, 2022 Before Judges Haas and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the Superior … to dismiss all other pending charges against him and to recommend an aggregate sentence of six years in prison. The … burden, the defendant must allege and articulate specific facts that "provide the court with an adequate basis on …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 12, 2023 – Decided December 18, 2023 Before Judges Haas and Puglisi. On appeal from the Superior … limited. R. 1:36-3. 2 A-3376-21 dismissing the defamation complaint plaintiff filed against defendants David Wildstein … the trial court made the following pertinent findings of fact. On August 31, 2020, plaintiff filed his complaint …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 15, 2023 – Decided July 13, 2023 Before Judges Accurso and Vernoia. On appeal from the Superior … we affirm. What little we know about this foreclosure comes from the trial court's Rule 2:5-1(b) amplification, … bid violated Rule 1:7-4, which requires the court to find facts and state its conclusions of law for every written …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 29, 2024 – Decided February 6, 2024 Before Judges Mawla and Vinci. On appeal from the Board of … Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Jeffrey David Padgett, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief). NOT FOR … result of an accident because "the work effort, alone or in combination with pre-existing disease, was the cause of the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 12, 2024 – Decided March 19, 2024 Before Judges Haas and Gooden Brown. On appeal from the … robbery, one count of second-degree conspiracy to commit robbery, and one count of carjacking. Pursuant to his … though a defendant's age was not a statutory mitigating factor at the time of sentencing,2 his attorney should have …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 26, 2024 – Decided March 26, 2024 Before Judges Gilson and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the … 0684. Jennifer Nicole Sellitti, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Richard Sparaco, Designated Counsel, on the … NOT HARMLESS, AND THERE WAS A GENUINE ISSUE OF MATERIAL FACT IN DISPUTE, THE PCR COURT ERRED WHEN IT DENIED THE …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted June 3, 2024 – Decided July 5, 2024 Before Judges Berdote Byrne and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal … in her well-reasoned oral opinion. We add the following comments. I. Defendant was indicted in February 2005 on one … we afford deference to the PCR court's findings of fact, but our interpretation of the law is de novo. State v. …
default
… Argued September 13, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Ostrer and Mayer. On appeal from Superior Court … a lengthy plenary hearing, and set forth her reasons in a comprehensive written opinion. This is not a typical … residence in New Jersey. The trial court reviewed those facts in detail. In summary, the parties began a …