default
… REGIONAL BOARD OF EDUCATION, BOROUGH OF PENNS GROVE, NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … order that dismissed on summary judgment her negligence complaint against defendant Y-By, Inc. Because there was no … d/b/a Y-Buy Rental Party. 3 A-3551-19 We summarize the facts from the motion record in a light most favorable to …
njcourts.gov
… THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF THE DENIAL OF A RETIRED LAW EN- FORCEMENT OFFICER PERMIT TO CARRY FIRE- ARMS FOR: A.A.1 … and well-reasoned opinion. We add only the following brief comments. We discern the following facts from the record. Petitioner was employed as a …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 26, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Fuentes and Mayer. On appeal from the New Jersey … of a weapon for an unlawful purpose. These offenses were committed in 1995. Barclay first became eligible for parole … recidivism. The panel also found the following mitigating factors: (1) participation in programs specific to behavior; …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted June 3, 2020 – Decided June 18, 2020 Before Judges Haas, Mayer and Enright. On appeal from the … should be reversed because the Division allegedly did not comply with the requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act … and the children. Instead, we incorporate by reference the factual findings and legal conclusions contained in Judge …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 18, 2020 – Decided April 24, 2020 Before Judges Fuentes and Enright. On appeal from the Superior … well-reasoned oral opinion. Because Judge Schuck's opinion comprehensively and correctly addressed all of defendant's … her trial attorney answered all her questions to her satisfaction. At defendant's sentencing in January 2015, her …
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 13, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Gilson. On appeal from an … another ground for termination. In October 2018, seller commenced this action in the Chancery Division, seeking … have been denied because: (a) "[m]aterial questions of fact regarding the meaning of the agreement at issue should …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted July 9, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Nugent and Accurso. On appeal from the Board of … merchandise was entitled to a refund of $19.50. Claimant completed the transaction and the refund amount was placed … The Examiner based his decision on the undisputed facts that claimant never apprised the customer of the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 4, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Messano and Susswein. On appeal from the … State v. Yarbough, 100 N.J. 627, 643–44 (1985) (explaining factors for imposing consecutive sentences). We also … factors found by the sentencing court were not based upon competent and credible evidence in the record; or (3) "the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 19, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Currier. On appeal from the Superior … costs. We affirm. I On December 3, 2018, plaintiff filed a complaint against Ramirez alleging breach of contract. The … to [] plaintiff; however, [] plaintiff has established the fact that they both went to the car dealership, they are …
njcourts.gov
… Defendant-Appellant. Submitted November 6, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Accurso and Rose. On appeal from the Superior … substantially for the reasons contained in the thorough and comprehensive written decision of Judge Susswein. We add … recognized, however, "[t]hat contention is belied by the fact that [defendant] has filed two [PCR] petitions [on the …
njcourts.gov
… which results in the loss or destruction of a vessel, commits a crime of the third degree. To convince you that is … amount to total destruction. Any amount of damage is enough for the act to be a crime. A vessel is any structure … knowledge with which the defendant acted is a question of fact for you, ladies and gentlemen, to decide. Purpose and …
njcourts.gov
… by a monitored subject is guilty of a crime. In order for you to find defendant guilty of this crime, the State … that can be used to permit law enforcement agencies to compare the geographic positions of monitored subjects with … of direct proof but must ordinarily be inferred from the facts. Therefore, it is not necessary that the State produce …
njcourts.gov
… ― Page 3 of 4 … 5.30E Effect of Black Out … (Approved before 1984) The fact that the automobile operated by defendant left the … by the negligence of the defendant and calls upon him/her for an explanation of the reason for the unusual course of …
njcourts.gov
… scope of practice permitted by the board order. In order for the defendant to be convicted of this offense, the State … of direct proof but must ordinarily be inferred from the facts. Therefore, it is not necessary that the State produce … not guilty. � Cannel, N.J. Criminal Code Annotated, comment on N.J.S.A. 2C:21-20 (2016-17); see also Morris v. …
njcourts.gov
… … The statute provides in pertinent part: A person commits a crime if the person knowingly submits to the government any claim for payment for performance of a government contract knowing … of direct proof but must ordinarily be inferred from the facts. Therefore, it is not necessary that the State produce …
njcourts.gov
… Approved 6/11/18 … TAMPERING WITH PUBLIC RECORDS OR INFORMATION … (Recording Devices in Patrol Vehicles) … … of our statutes provides in pertinent part: A person commits a crime if he purposely and unlawfully alters, … of direct proof but must ordinarily be inferred from the facts. Therefore, it is not necessary that the State produce …
njcourts.gov
… 2C:33-31a(4) … The indictment charges the defendant with committing the crime of dog fighting. The indictment reads … a place owned or controlled by that person to be used for the purpose of fighting or baiting a dog. To find the … of direct proof, but must ordinarily be inferred from the facts. Therefore, it is not necessary, members of the jury, …
njcourts.gov
… faith negotiations between a willing seller without any compulsion to sell and a willing buyer without any … (Sup. Ct. 1920); rule cited with approval in Winkler v. Hartford Acc. and Ind. Co ., 66 N.J . Super . 22, 27 (App. Div. … The defendant is liable only for the actual value if, in fact, less than the face value. … Cases … : Arnold v. …
njcourts.gov
… heard evidence that [name(s) of witness(es)] who testified for the State [is/are] [a] foreign national(s) who [is/are] … this country. … (In all cases) … You may not use the mere fact that [name of witness(es)] may not be a legal resident … to conclude that [he/she/they] [is/are] less likely to comply with our society’s rules and, therefore, more likely …
njcourts.gov
… witness' testimony at the trial may be considered by you for the purpose of judging the witness' credibility. It may … contradictory statement or omitted statement. However, before deciding whether the prior inconsistent or omitted … as bearing on his or her credibility. You may consider such factors as where and when the prior statement or omission …