-
njcourts.gov
… LLC; INVESTIGROUP, LLC a Hawaiian limited liability company; and INVESTIGROUP NP A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION, a … Defendants. AMENDED ORDER1 THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon the Motion for Entry of Final Judgment … N.J.S.A. 49:3-60, and is cause for the imposition of civil monetary penalties pursuant to N.J.S.A. 49:3-70.1; it is …
-
njcourts.gov
… Questions or comments may be directed to 609-292-4638 Supplement to … PRESIDING JUDGES FROM: RICHARD J. WILLIAMS SUBJ: PLEA FORMS AND JUDGMENTS OF CONVICTION – SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL … eligible for parole, which period could be as long as one half of the period of the custodial sentenced imposed? …
-
A-2654-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Suite 301 Princeton, NJ 08540 (609) 455-1540 Attorneys for Defendant/Respondent Princeton Eye and Ear, LLC Civil … v. PRINCETON EYE AND EAR LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY … he already made to the Chancery Court. For this reason alone, Dr. Ondik's appeal should be dismissed. Second, the …
njcourts.gov
… ## NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … On appeal from the New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission. Law Offices of Shannon Garrahan, PC, attorney … the highways of this State for a period of not less than one year or more than two years upon conviction" under …
njcourts.gov
… ## NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … is responsible for their proportionate share of the common expenses and administrative costs of operating the … … . (s) To bring and defend actions by or against more than one Unit Owner which are pertinent to the operation of the …
njcourts.gov
… and MANUEL GONZALEZ, Defendants, and FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY and MID- CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, … Argued December 18, 2025 – Decided March 13, 2026 Before Judges Marczyk and Puglisi. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … moot and is not at issue on appeal. 6 A-0440-24 Kernan v. One Wash. Park Urb. Renewal Assocs., 154 N.J. 437, 457 …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 6, 2025 – Decided February 10, 2026 Before Judges Currier and Berdote Byrne. On appeal from the … PER CURIAM This matter arises from litigation plaintiffs commenced against defendant regarding alleged alterations to … away from plaintiffs' unit, which reduced its footprint by one bedroom. In the OTSC and verified complaint, plaintiffs …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 27, 2025 – Decided April 7, 2025 Before Judges Walcott-Henderson and Vinci. On appeal from the … venue, granting defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint without prejudice, and directing plaintiff to … explained he was initially assigned this matter and questioned whether it should be transferred to the Chancery …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 23, 2025 ‒ Decided December 31, 2025 Before Judges Mawla and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from the … R. Kazlau's cogent written statement of reasons accompanying the order. We briefly summarize the facts gleaned … the "operation" element of the DWI statute. The judge reasoned the State satisfied its burden and proved defendant …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 5, 2025 – Decided December 31, 2025 Before Judges Sumners and Susswein. On appeal from the … 2 A-2969-23 As a result of robbing an Ocean Township cell phone store with four other individuals, defendant Anthony … not review the State's evidence with him until the trial commenced. He claimed appellate counsel failed to argue …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 10, 2025 – Decided January 14, 2026 Before Judges Gummer and Vanek. On appeal from the Superior … the same reasons set forth in the PCR judge's well-reasoned written opinion. I. We previously detailed the … On February 27, 2024, the PCR judge entered an order and a comprehensive written decision denying defendant's PCR …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 22, 2026 – Decided February 2, 2026 Before Judges Mayer and Jacobs. On appeal from the Superior … order denying his motion for reconsideration and granting "compensatory damages" to plaintiff in the amount of … good cause requirement for dissolving an FRO is to prevent one party from "relitigat[ing] the FRO hearing." Id. at 16.; …
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 15, 2025 – Decided December 9, 2025 Before Judges Susswein, Chase and Augostini. On appeal from … Salah and defendant operated a real estate development company, Deer Haven Development, L.L.C. (Deer Haven) and … the Note. The Note was dated December 13, 2007, and had a one-year maturity date, which later was extended through …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 16, 2025 – Decided December 12, 2025 Before Judges Mayer and Jacobs. On appeal from the Superior … I. Plaintiff and defendant, who were never married, share one child, Jacob, born in 2005. Litigation between the … he further challenged the fairness of the $60,000 annual income imputed to him under prior court orders. Plaintiff …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 9, 2025 – Decided December 17, 2025 Before Judges Susswein and Chase. On appeal from the Superior … and found his testimony lacked credibility. The court commented that when defendant thought answering the question … Supreme Court in Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687. State v. Konecny, 250 N.J. 321, 342 (2022). "First, the defendant must …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 9, 2025 – Decided December 17, 2025 Before Judges Rose and Torregrossa-O'Connor. On appeal from … 20, 2025 order. In his written statement of reasons accompanying the order, the judge noted defendant opposed the … judge correctly recognized "a court is permitted to award 'monetary compensation for losses suffered as a direct result …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 9, 2025 – Decided December 26, 2025 Before Judges Sumners and Chase. On appeal from the New Jersey Civil Service Commission, Docket No. 2023-1362. Fusco & Macaluso, … Regarding the penalty reduction, the ALJ further reasoned the sustained specifications were directly related to …
njcourts.gov
… NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS NAVIGATORS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY … 70-90 Columbus Drive site. AJD was the general contractor for the construction project and contracted with Blade … parties had engaged in contract negotiations before this one and both parties were sophisticated contractors. 7 …
njcourts.gov
… NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS M.G. McLAREN, P.C. and McLAREN … STEEL CORP., JOHN DOES 1-10 (being fictitious names for persons unknown) and ABC CORPS 1-10 (being fictitious … standard of care required for designing certain steel components that were to be manufactured by Hackensack. The …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … Inc. (Hudson), appeals from a dismissal of a count in the complaint seeking damages against Oval Tennis, Inc. (Oval), … there is no certification and nothing by which someone can actually be "certified." A-3063-13T1 4 Not all …