-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5702-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … complaints alleging violations of the Borough of Beach Haven's sign ordinance. On appeal, defendant contends the … are permitted except as" set forth in the ordinance. Beach Haven, N.J., Ordinances, Zoning-Signs, Ordinance § 212-16A …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1253-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … before or during his investigation. The State sought to have D'Alessio identify N.R. and defendant on the video, and … A. Evidence of the Attempted Identification Should Not Have Been Admitted Because Its Limited Probative Value Was …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2000-18T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … of the Sexual Abuse Nurse Examiner (SANE) should not have been admitted; 4) the judge violated his due process … since I've been on this case, different prosecutors have handled this case as well . . . . This is a serious …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3512-17T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … to suppress the firearm. He asserts the court should not have credited the suppression hearing testimony of the … that gap time credit awarded at sentencing should instead have been credited as time served. After carefully reviewing …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1273-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … the contents of the prescription bottle would inevitably have been discovered during a search incident to arrest. The … item to the other male in exchange for what may have been folded money. There was no observation of …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0830-19T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … as he had claimed, the Cyber Unit detectives "would never have been able to download files" using defendant's … was downloaded. Plea counsel testified he "would never have a client plead guilty, if they [we]re in fact not …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0601-17T3 JAMES D. RALPH, III, and DIANE … by deed of Berkeley Point." The Gangi Deed does not have a metes and bounds description. The property is … record shows that the property taxes for Block 52, Lot 45 have at all relevant times been assessed on a lot that is …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3525-22 ANDREW COLLINS, NADEEM MASOOD … before the Board. 5 A-3525-22 floor, the application would have been fully conforming and presented to the Planning … would make productive use of a collection of lots that have been vacant or substantially underutilized over the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1246-22 CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, … The report also asserts that several lots in the Property "have access issues due to their location, topography issues … exercise of zoning or land-use regulatory authority, would have an economic impact on Conrail's use of the Property for …
-
njcourts.gov
… ,"'3, ~,.,, MAR 25 2025 SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: BERGEN COUNTY CASE NO. 291 MASTER DOCKET NO.: … Counsel to assess whether sufficient medical records have been collected to begin scheduling plaintiffs' … Counsel to assess whether sufficient medical records have been collected to begin scheduling plaintiffs' …
-
njcourts.gov
… May 22, 2024 SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION: BERGEN COUNTY DOCKET NO. F-691-22 OPINION … with a potential purchase and sale contract which would have paid Plaintiff in full as to the loan amount and … willful interference with a contract of sale, which would have paid off the loans in full. It is conceded in both …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2080-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE … adjudications . . . ."). The statement provides, "I.C. does have prior contacts with the New Jersey juvenile court … of I.C.'s juvenile delinquency history. The parties have inferred from the opinion that the trial court found it …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0753-21 806 6TH ST. HCPVI, LLC, … to hardship stay cases. It applies where the tenant didn't have the money and the tenant is going to be locked out and … the Stack Amendment provides relief only "to tenants who have judgments entered against them after the effective …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2022-21 SEASIDE PROPERTIES, LLC, … third-party defendants were assigned to PB Dock, LLC and have, therefore, been either discharged or settled. 11 … cause of action and the progress of discovery to date would have been sufficient to withstand a motion for dismissal …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3499-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … assert that errors existed at the trial level that could have been ascertained by appellate counsel's review of the … if counsel's failure to appeal the issue could not have prejudiced the defendant because the appellate court …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … or water main repair procedures specifically. Jurors do not have experience with underground water main breaks or with … an expert to explain how and when [defendant] should have known about the condition, and what it should have done …
njcourts.gov
… and Factual Findings The City of Newark/City of Newark-Division of Sewer and Water (“Newark”) is the owner of one … the same.” In response, Newark’s counsel stated that “we have been working under the assumption that the restrictions … Therefore, in my opinion, the subject property does not have a market value.” However, because he was asked to …
-
A-0509-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… and LANCE SCHONER SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION Docket A-509-23 CIVIL ACTION On appeal from the … a $13,500.00 project and been paid $6,800.00, he’d have been owed $6,700.00, not $7,800.00 as he testified. 106 … there been competing testimony, the trial court judge would have been obligated to make findings of fact and set forth …
-
015734-2014, 006894-2015, 005070-2016, 007402-2018, 005841-2018, 006935-2019, 008282-2019, 008756-2020, 011966-2020, 003283-2021, and 003338-2021
Opinion
njcourts.gov
… and Factual Findings The City of Newark/City of Newark-Division of Sewer and Water (“Newark”) is the owner of one … the same.” In response, Newark’s counsel stated that “we have been working under the assumption that the restrictions … Therefore, in my opinion, the subject property does not have a market value.” However, because he was asked to …
-
A-0274-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… COURT OF NEW JERSEY STATE OF NEW JERSEY, : APPELLATE DIVISION : : Docket No. A-000274-23 Team 02 Plaintiff, : : On … observations.” 5T43-5/44-5. Defense counsel proffered to have Baverov “testify not substantively [to] pursue a line … a few beers, one beer, no beer. It’s an abnormality that I have no control over.” 5T49-10/14. Rather than develop or …