-
A-52-24 Respondent Brief
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… September 26, 2024 BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION On the Brief: JACQUELYN A. DICICCO, ESQ. … New York 10504 (914) 685-5015 jacquelyn.dicicco@jrobbinlaw.com Date Submitted: December 10, 2024 (800) 4-APPEAL • … consumer oriented commercial transactions involving the sale of merchandise or services. Huertas v. Galaxy Asset …
-
A-3-25 Amicus Curiae Brief Pacific Legal Foundation
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… VA 22201 (916) 503-9041 JHoughton@pacificlegal.org Counsel for Amicus Curiae Pacific Legal Foundation FILED, Clerk of … 4 I. The Government’s Eminent Domain Power Is Not for Sale ....................... 4 II. The Taken Properties … 16 Commonwealth v. Rush, 14 Pa. 186 (1850) …
default
… Submitted January 29, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Rothstadt and Gilson. On appeal from Superior … appellant pro se. Pluese, Becker & Saltzman, LLC, attorneys for respondent (Stuart H. West, on the brief). PER CURIAM … favor of plaintiff, Freedom Mortgage Corporation, and the sale of the real property at a sheriff's sale. Defendant was …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 29, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Rothstadt and Gilson. On appeal from Superior … appellant pro se. Pluese, Becker & Saltzman, LLC, attorneys for respondent (Stuart H. West, on the brief). PER CURIAM … favor of plaintiff, Freedom Mortgage Corporation, and the sale of the real property at a sheriff's sale. Defendant was …
njcourts.gov
… * NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE TAX COURT COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY Mala Sundar … in his judgment, it would sell for at a fair and bona fide sale by private contract on October 1” of the year prior to …
njcourts.gov
… NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0115-22 O. BERK COMPANY, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GLAMSQUAD, INC., … Argued September 27, 2023 – Decided October 13, 2023 Before Judges Smith and Perez Friscia. On appeal from the … the sum of $1,318,807. The APA set forth the terms of the sale as follows: Section 1.01 Purchase and Sale of Assets. …
default
… Argued August 29, 2018 – Decided October 5, 2018 Before Judges Alvarez and Gooden Brown. On appeal from … LLC (H&H).1 Halligan was the managing member of both companies. On April 9, 2012, Halligan filed a complaint … property owned by H&H was sold for $1.1 million. The net sale proceeds of $845,151.56 were deposited into Murray- …
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 26, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman, O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from … The couple had a son and a daughter. Plaintiff filed a complaint for divorce on January 7, 2009, citing … the court awarded plaintiff a tax credit of $23,000 for the sale of the family home. In January 2011, the couple's …
-
njcourts.gov
… * NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE TAX COURT COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY Mala Sundar … in his judgment, it would sell for at a fair and bona fide sale by private contract on October 1” of the year prior to …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 26, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman, O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from … The couple had a son and a daughter. Plaintiff filed a complaint for divorce on January 7, 2009, citing … the court awarded plaintiff a tax credit of $23,000 for the sale of the family home. In January 2011, the couple's …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued August 29, 2018 – Decided October 5, 2018 Before Judges Alvarez and Gooden Brown. On appeal from … LLC (H&H).1 Halligan was the managing member of both companies. On April 9, 2012, Halligan filed a complaint … property owned by H&H was sold for $1.1 million. The net sale proceeds of $845,151.56 were deposited into Murray- …
-
njcourts.gov
… NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0115-22 O. BERK COMPANY, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GLAMSQUAD, INC., … Argued September 27, 2023 – Decided October 13, 2023 Before Judges Smith and Perez Friscia. On appeal from the … the sum of $1,318,807. The APA set forth the terms of the sale as follows: Section 1.01 Purchase and Sale of Assets. …
njcourts.gov
… Argued April 30, 2024 – Decided June 20, 2024 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Natali. On appeal from the … summary judgment and dismissing his malicious prosecution complaint. We affirm. I. We begin by reviewing the facts in … been on at least ten prior occasions. In the process of the sale, the parties' attorneys exchanged emails on September …
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 20, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Ostrer and Vernoia. On appeal from the Superior … decision; but are constrained to remand in part for a more complete statement of reasons for the court's order … property's value or the carrying costs associated with the sale of the apartment. He also alleged there were …
njcourts.gov
… 1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY MERCER … Defendants. Decided: July 29, 2025 WILLIAM OLIVERO, pro se, for plaintiffs. ROBERT D. BAILEY, attorney for defendant … thirty-even (37) days prior to a scheduled foreclosure sale.” The letter also stated that mortgage lien remained in …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 20, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Ostrer and Vernoia. On appeal from the Superior … decision; but are constrained to remand in part for a more complete statement of reasons for the court's order … property's value or the carrying costs associated with the sale of the apartment. He also alleged there were …
-
njcourts.gov
… 1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY MERCER … Defendants. Decided: July 29, 2025 WILLIAM OLIVERO, pro se, for plaintiffs. ROBERT D. BAILEY, attorney for defendant … thirty-even (37) days prior to a scheduled foreclosure sale.” The letter also stated that mortgage lien remained in …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued April 30, 2024 – Decided June 20, 2024 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Natali. On appeal from the … summary judgment and dismissing his malicious prosecution complaint. We affirm. I. We begin by reviewing the facts in … been on at least ten prior occasions. In the process of the sale, the parties' attorneys exchanged emails on September …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 13, 2022 – Decided February 23, 2023 Before Judges Gilson, Rose, and Gummer. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … The court also found that Cara had not arranged to have a competent adult care for Jack when Cara was under the … that Jack was with Mia, Cara had the right to regularly visit Jack. Cara, 5 A-2088-21 however, missed most of those …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 18, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Manahan and Suter. On appeal from Superior Court … during school vacations. In the summer of 2013, the girls visited Jamie. During the visit, Darla and Rebecca disclosed … the Division filed an order to show cause and verified complaint against Jamie and Charles seeking the care, …