njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1393-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Monmouth County, Indictment No. 02-03- 0485. … claim of innocence, defendant argues that it was likely to have changed the jury's verdict. Defendant also contends the …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3934-23 CAPE JETTY, LLC, … Jr. and Marisa J. Hermanovich, on the brief). Intervenors have not filed a brief. PER CURIAM Plaintiff Cape Jetty, LLC … board, but to determine whether the board could reasonably have reached its decision on the record." Ibid. "[W]hen a …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1449-24 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Amendments generally guarantee a defendant the right to have a unanimous jury find beyond a reasonable doubt any … because they are not subject to pipeline retroactivity. We have considered all of defendant's arguments on appeal and, …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0035-24 FAITH HAINES, Appellant, v. NEW … in May 2021. The law is well-established that prisoners have limited due process rights. Avant, 67 N.J. at 529-30; … regulation. In that regard, we note that those regulations have existed for several years and Haines can only challenge …
njcourts.gov
… In the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) The Bank of New York Mellon v. … Instead, the Court reverses the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge … United States until September 26, 2006; they thus could not have signed the documents on September 25. In October and …
njcourts.gov
… in the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) State v. John C. Blann (A-75-12) … the Court’s reversal of the judgment of the Appellate Division is based substantially on the reasons expressed in … defendant, using equally profane language, that he did not have any money and that defendant should go bother someone …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … Inc. 2 Plaintiffs did not file a cross-appeal so we have not considered their request in their brief to increase … wanted Viega Pro Press fittings because he wanted to have the same fittings throughout the home, and wanted the …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1272-21 SUMMIT CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P., a … (1975) ("It is firmly established that controversies which have become moot or academic prior to judicial resolution … attempted to file a "Non-Contested 3 To date, defendants have not cured the "Events of Default" declared under the …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4947-14T2 U.S. BANK NATIONAL … sought leave to appeal Judge Toskos's orders and to have the matter removed to federal court, Palifrone and … for reconsideration and, concluded that defendants did not have standing to challenge the provisions of a trust, and …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3321-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … trial court has "the 'feel' of the case[,]" which we do not have upon viewing 5 A-3321-20 a cold record. State v. … warrant when the officer believes the individual whom they have detained is armed and dangerous. Terry, 392 U.S. at 27; …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2154-21 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … nature of the touching on October 2nd, but admitted he may have accidentally grazed the other resident's leg while … for providing or arranging for treatment of persons who have been civilly committed. N.J.S.A. 30:4-27.34(a) to (b). …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2481-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … the conclusions of the Law Division judge "could reasonably have been reached on sufficient credible evidence present in … L. 2019, c. 271, § 8, eff. 5 A-2481-21 The amendments might have made it easier for defendant to obtain a New Jersey …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2281-21 LESLIE J. DEANS, … dismissal of the action, to reinstate the complaint, and to have a new "non-binding arbitration." The trial court heard … 381 N.J. Super. 593, 597 (App. Div. 2005)). Accordingly, we have cautioned: [W]hen neither party has made a timely …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0638-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … to resentencing and 5 A-0638-21 relies on cases that have prescribed rules for sentencing juveniles. In that … held that under New Jersey's Constitution, juveniles who have previously been sentenced to a mandatory prison term of …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1373-22 ARTHERINE PRICE, … if, "but for the event, the [injury] probably would not have happened." Ibid. Proximate cause is "any cause which in … complained of and without which the [injury] would not have occurred." Conklin v. Hannoch Weisman, 145 N.J. 395, …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2731-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BERNARDO CHAVEZ- PADILLA, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ … other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. 2 A-2731-21 Defendant Chavez-Padilla appeals from an April 6, 2022 order denying …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0585-23 BOONTON MOSQUE & ISLAMIC … and review."). As for the motion for reconsideration, we have determined: 6 A-0585-23 Reconsideration itself is "a … as a basis for presenting facts or arguments that could have been provided in opposition to the original motion. …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3253-22 SB BUILDING ASSOCIATES, LP, SB … exercise that authority even though it does not presently have a plan to devote the property to active recreational … 358 (App. Div. 2005), aff'd, 188 N.J. 531 (2006). As we have noted, the present case arises in the context of a …
njcourts.gov
… : ::: SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY ATLANTIC COUNTY – LAW DIVISION CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO: ATL-L-2516-19 (CBLP) ORDER … and David Perlman (collectively “The Waves Defendants”) have opposed the motion. The court heard oral argument on … also held that the application of judicial estoppel should have prevented Texaco from asserting newly found theories of …
njcourts.gov
… MCKENZIE, Defendant(s). SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MONMOUTH COUNTY Docket No: MON-DC-6506-24 Civil … 12 CFR § 1026.51 – the so-called “Ability to Pay” provision of the Truth in Lending Act (TILA). Citibank moves to … was similarly unavailing. To be sure “New Jersey courts have been reluctant to infer a statutory private right of …