njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1798-16T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … and vaginal penetration of a victim whom he knew or should have known was physically helpless, mentally defective or … COUNSEL]: Yes. [THE COURT]: Okay. [APPELLATE COUNSEL]: I have -- after talking to the client I -- yesterday I did …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0604-16T1 MORRIS PLAINS HOLDING VF, LLC, … of hazardous substance, those dischargers and persons shall have a right of contribution against all other dischargers … seems to rest on the absence of a witness claiming to have seen Meghnagi actually discharge PCE onto the property. …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4222-16T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … 2C:12-1(b)(3); and second-degree certain persons not to have weapons, N.J.S.A. 2C:39- 7. The charges stemmed from … unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." A "reasonable probability" simply …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2444-16T1 SELCO BUILDERS, LLC, … work. Baglivo estimated it cost him "roughly $86,000" to have the replacement contractor complete the job. At the … did not proffer what other additional testimony he would have added to his proofs if he had been given a further …
njcourts.gov
… counsel’s certification, was that the “City’s motion should have been denied because” the City failed to “timely raise … the judgment or order and which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under … it is no longer equitable that the judgment or order should have prospective application; or (f) any other reason …
njcourts.gov
… counsel’s certification, was that the “City’s motion should have been denied because” the City failed to “timely raise … the judgment or order and which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under … it is no longer equitable that the judgment or order should have prospective application; or (f) any other reason …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2449-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … and N.H., the fathers of Kurt and Nan, respectively. They have not appealed. In a comprehensive oral decision, Judge … testimony from Dr. Alan Lee, who opined that the children have a secure bond with the resource parents and would …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5378-15T4 LARRY PRICE, … Larry D'Arrigo and Union City Zoning Board of Adjustment have not filed briefs. PER CURIAM Plaintiff Larry Price … negative criteria." Ibid. (citations omitted). Our courts have recognized that "because of their peculiar knowledge of …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5377-15T1 LASALLE BANK N.A. AS TRUSTEE … efficiency with the equitable notion that courts should have authority to avoid an unjust result in any given … and Angeles, that "even if [the] plaintiff did not have the note or a valid assignment when it filed the …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5494-15T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED BECAUSE DEFENDANT CANNOT BE FOUND GUILTY … "a second or subsequent" DWI and, therefore, should not have been charged under N.J.S.A. 2C:40-26(b). We disagree. …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4785-14T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … the second prong of Carter, that the evidence could not have been discovered through reasonable diligence, the 6 … to demonstrate that the evidence of these convictions would have altered the verdict. Finally, the judge held that …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3591-14T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … "[h]e seeks to go behind the judgment of conviction to have at the very minimum the [presentence investigation … OF UNCONSTUTIONAL SENTENCING DISPARITY 5 A-3591-14T2 We have considered this contention in light of the record and …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0224-15T1 LESLIE CAVRELL, … pay $12,500 per month in permanent alimony to plaintiff. We have no NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE … that plaintiff's motions to enforce provisions of the MSA have been numerous and usually granted. In February 2013, …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5519-17T4 R.H., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … We affirm. I. R.H. and S.Y.K. were married in 2013 and have one child, E.H., who was born in 2013. In 2015, R.H. … and (7) neither New Jersey courts nor the courts in Italy have familiarity with the parties' post-judgment …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0198-17T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … into the patrol car, the officer advised defendant he would have to be patted down. Defendant agreed and told the officer he did not have any weapons on him. 3 A-0198-17T2 Upon patting him …
-
2C:20-25a
Charges Document PDF
njcourts.gov
… purpose,” “designed,” “with design” or equivalent terms have the same meanings.1 A person acts knowingly with … a result. “Knowing,” “with knowledge or equivalent terms have the same meaning.2 1 N.J.S.A. 2C:2-2(b)(1). 2 N.J.S.A. … authorization or in excess of his/her authorization. I have already explained the meaning of “access” to you. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3234-18T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Defendant raises one point of error—that the judge should have given the jury the "false in one, false in all … the knife was defendant. The argument that the victim may have lied about defendant's possession of the knife did not …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3105-18T2 LINDA LITTON, … of Epstein's corrupt and biased practices. We affirm. We have previously addressed these allegations in Litton v. … of religious divorces" that the award in his case must have been affected. However, this reads as, and is, a bald …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY CASE NO. 623 FILED … Management Order No. I was issued, additional cases have been dismissed without prejudice by plaintiffs' …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1931-16T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … IAC claim on this ground was barred because it could have been raised on direct appeal, but was not. Shepherd, … while appellate review is pending, however, our courts have uniformly held that neither appellate review, State v. …