-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0585-23 BOONTON MOSQUE & ISLAMIC … and review."). As for the motion for reconsideration, we have determined: 6 A-0585-23 Reconsideration itself is "a … as a basis for presenting facts or arguments that could have been provided in opposition to the original motion. …
-
njcourts.gov
… MCKENZIE, Defendant(s). SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MONMOUTH COUNTY Docket No: MON-DC-6506-24 Civil … 12 CFR § 1026.51 – the so-called “Ability to Pay” provision of the Truth in Lending Act (TILA). Citibank moves to … was similarly unavailing. To be sure “New Jersey courts have been reluctant to infer a statutory private right of …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3253-22 SB BUILDING ASSOCIATES, LP, SB … exercise that authority even though it does not presently have a plan to devote the property to active recreational … 358 (App. Div. 2005), aff'd, 188 N.J. 531 (2006). As we have noted, the present case arises in the context of a …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0638-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … to resentencing and 5 A-0638-21 relies on cases that have prescribed rules for sentencing juveniles. In that … held that under New Jersey's Constitution, juveniles who have previously been sentenced to a mandatory prison term of …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1997-22 U'BAY LUMUMBA, Appellant, v. NEW … Board likewise rejected Lumumba's argument that it should have considered the COVID-19 crisis and his positive COVID … granting parole. Lumumba also argued that the Board should have rescinded its decision denying parole because it relied …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3326-23 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, … Motel Corp., 296 N.J. Super. 402, 411 (App. Div. 1997)). To have standing in a foreclosure action, "'a party seeking to … Super. 323, 327-28 (Ch. Div. 2010)). If a party does not have ownership or control of the underlying debt, the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1853-23 ANN MINZNER-CONLEY, … third party would supervise the process. Defendant would have an opportunity to see what plaintiff intended to take … to tell you that I'm glad, because I think you . . . should have a look of concern. I probably have a look of concern on …
-
njcourts.gov
… ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION MONMOUTH COUNTY DOCKET NO. MON-C-41-22 TIMOTHY J. … or the Brill standard, plaintiffs would be entitled to have the court either assume what they allege or rely on is … law.” Id., Exhibit B (emphasis added). Plaintiffs don’t have to prove their claims at this stage. See Sickles v. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2615-22 JAMI ROBLEJO, … Plaintiff and defendant married on April 29, 2016, and have one child, a son, born in September 2017. The parties … marriage, ages nineteen and twenty. These adult children have significant needs and were diagnosed with autism …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1373-22 ARTHERINE PRICE, … if, "but for the event, the [injury] probably would not have happened." Ibid. Proximate cause is "any cause which in … complained of and without which the [injury] would not have occurred." Conklin v. Hannoch Weisman, 145 N.J. 395, …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2281-21 LESLIE J. DEANS, … dismissal of the action, to reinstate the complaint, and to have a new "non-binding arbitration." The trial court heard … 381 N.J. Super. 593, 597 (App. Div. 2005)). Accordingly, we have cautioned: [W]hen neither party has made a timely …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2154-21 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … nature of the touching on October 2nd, but admitted he may have accidentally grazed the other resident's leg while … for providing or arranging for treatment of persons who have been civilly committed. N.J.S.A. 30:4-27.34(a) to (b). …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3321-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … trial court has "the 'feel' of the case[,]" which we do not have upon viewing 5 A-3321-20 a cold record. State v. … warrant when the officer believes the individual whom they have detained is armed and dangerous. Terry, 392 U.S. at 27; …
-
njcourts.gov
… Corp., and McKesson Corp SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION – MIDDLESEX COUNTY MCL NO.: 629 DOCKET NO.: … Bern & Partners LLP, upon notice to all interested parties, have moved before this Court to Reinstate Plaintiff’s … arguing that many Plaintiffs subject to CMO 8 did not have specific vaccination records because Zostavax is widely …
-
njcourts.gov
… and EDWARD FLAHERTY, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: BERGEN COUNTY Plaintiffs, DOCKET NO. BER-L-6959-19 … vs. ETIDCON, INC., ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY, a Division of Ethicon, Inc., GYNECARE, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, and … matter, pursuant to Rule 4: 11-5. Plaintiffs have demonstrated the need for certain information to be …
-
njcourts.gov
… A. PERCIA, Plaintiffs, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION - BERGEN COUNTY DOCKET NO. BER-L-9279-15 MCL MASTER … shall be identified by page and line number and the parties have agreed to use the same 1 This MCL is not an eCourts … shall advise Defendants of any witness for whom Defendants have identified deposition designations to which Plaintiffs …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3468-23 CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE … trial or initiate or participate in a class action if you have a dispute with us. Instead, this provision tells you … will not make a better contract for parties than they have voluntarily made for themselves, nor alter their …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3934-23 CAPE JETTY, LLC, … Jr. and Marisa J. Hermanovich, on the brief). Intervenors have not filed a brief. PER CURIAM Plaintiff Cape Jetty, LLC … board, but to determine whether the board could reasonably have reached its decision on the record." Ibid. "[W]hen a …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0035-24 FAITH HAINES, Appellant, v. NEW … in May 2021. The law is well-established that prisoners have limited due process rights. Avant, 67 N.J. at 529-30; … regulation. In that regard, we note that those regulations have existed for several years and Haines can only challenge …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1449-24 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Amendments generally guarantee a defendant the right to have a unanimous jury find beyond a reasonable doubt any … because they are not subject to pipeline retroactivity. We have considered all of defendant's arguments on appeal and, …