-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 6, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Gilson and Rose. On appeal from the Superior … to file in the Law Division a counterclaim and third-party complaint against the landlord and its principal. Because the order was entered without a factual record and without factual findings supporting the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 18, 2018 – Decided May 8, 2018 Before Judges Koblitz and Manahan. On appeal from Superior … 150 counts of the indictment, which related to sexual acts committed against one child victim, were severed by request … defendant before weighing the aggravating and mitigating factors, and imposing 4 A-0416-15T3 sentence. In fashioning …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 12, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Reisner, Gilson, and Mayer. 1 The third-party complaint named as defendants Arrow Marine Services, LLC, … leased the marina space at the time of the trial, when in fact Arrow had 5 A-2172-15T3 vacated the marina in 2013. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 31, 2018 – Decided June 12, 2018 Before Judges Alvarez and Nugent. On appeal from Superior … OF COUNSEL FOR FAILING TO ARGUE ADEQUATELY FOR MITIGATING FACTORS AT SENTENCING. POINT TWO THE PCR COURT ERRONEOUSLY … of discretion. Cannel, New Jersey Criminal Code Annotated, comment 5 on N.J.S.A. 2C:44-1. We find no reason to conclude …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 20, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli and Haas. On appeal from Superior … supervised contact with the children.2 In a certification accompanying her motion, plaintiff denied that her boyfriend … owe substantial deference to the Family Part's findings of fact because of that court's special expertise in family …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 12, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Gilson. On appeal from Superior … these arguments and affirm. I. We derive the following facts from the trial record. On May 4, 2013, a Family Part … factors and the absence of mitigating factors based on competent and reasonably credible evidence in the record. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 21, 2022 – Decided October 3, 2022 Before Judges Vernoia and Firko. On appeal from the Superior … from a July 1, 2021 Special Civil Part order dismissing her complaint following a bench trial. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … witness at trial. Much of her testimony concerned dissatisfaction with one of the crowns, which she wanted removed, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 17, 2025 – Decided June 30, 2025 Before Judges Gummer and Jacobs. On appeal from the New Jersey … Facility ("EMCF"). She submitted a claim to DOC seeking compensation for four separate incidents of alleged theft of … review an administrative decision and ascertain if the facts upon which the order is based afford a reasonable …
-
njcourts.gov
… MICHAEL GALATI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. USAA INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. ____________________________ … Argued October 8, 2024 – Decided January 29, 2025 Before Judges Bishop-Thompson and Augostini. On appeal from … of service (DOS) for treatment by Dr. Gregory Gallick, together with counsel fees and costs of $1,225. The DRP's …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 21, 2025 – Decided March 31, 2025 Before Judges Sabatino, Gummer and Jablonski. On appeal from … in favor of defendant Robert Lewis and dismissing her complaint. We affirm. I. We glean the facts from the summary-judgment record after viewing them in …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 2, 2023 – Decided May 30, 2023 Before Judges Messano and Rose. On appeal from the Superior … detailed its execution in a short, written opinion that accompanied his order. Prior to executing the warrant, … N.J. 204, 211 (2001)). "Thus[,] when the adequacy of the facts offered to show probable cause is challenged after a …
-
njcourts.gov
… 10165 Tel: (212) 702-5000 Fax: (212) 818-0164 Attorneys for Plaintiffs IN RE ZOSTAVAX LITIGATION Sherri Sebring v. … have moved before this Court to Reinstate Plaintiff’s Complaint, which is currently dismissed without prejudice … vaccine, finding that same was not “something definite”. In fact, the Court noted that the current definition, in place …
-
#09-99
Administrative Directives
njcourts.gov
… Procedures to be Followed in Handling Applications for Communications Data Warrants and Communications … order applications is Arelevant and material@ articulable facts. V. Retention/Storage of Applications. Once a …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted July 8, 2025 – Decided July 17, 2025 Before Judges Natali and Jablonski. On appeal from the … Respondent has not filed a brief. PER CURIAM In this commercial tenancy action, plaintiff Remaq Corporation … is de novo). When presented with mixed questions of law and fact, we give deference to the trial court's supported …
-
njcourts.gov
… 2. The “Participation Period” shall mean the period of time commencing with execution of the parties’ Master Settlement … otherwise stated. B. Requirements to Produce Specified Information 4. Litigating Plaintiffs shall serve the following … documents and/or information on Merck: a. Plaintiff Fact Sheet (“PFS”): If not already completed, executed, and …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 22, 2026 – Decided January 30, 2026 Before Judges Mayer and Jacobs. On appeal from an … bills, accused her of alcohol and drug abuse, and complained 4 A- 0337-25 she was not participating in … motion.3 He agreed the abuse allegations formed a factual basis for a potential necessity defense to the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 20, 2025 – Decided November 5, 2025 Before Judges Sabatino and Walcott-Henderson. On appeal from … indicted on charges of first-degree criminal attempt to commit murder, N.J.S.A. 2C:5- 1(a)(3) and 2C:11-3(a)(1); … and acceptance of the plea agreement, expressed satisfaction with counsel, and did not raise any concerns about …
njcourts.gov
… Original Wordprocessor Version (NOTE: The status of this decision is Unpublished.) NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … on the brief). PER CURIAM CK Bergen Holdings, LLC (CKBH), a commercial landlord, appeals from two General Equity Part …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … are without merit, we affirm.1 The matter has a long and complicated factual and procedural history which is set out … 3 We take this portion of the facts in part from an unofficial transcript of the proceedings of November 22, 2012. …
njcourts.gov
… identity. R. 1:38- 3(d)(12) and N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.10a(a). NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … we affirm for the reasons stated by Judge Axelrad in her comprehensive oral opinion on October 6, 2021. We add the … 420, 448 (2012). "The considerations involved are extremely fact sensitive and require particularized evidence that …